Skip to content

Low-dose IL-2( Interleukin-2) Treatment in SLE

Safety and Efficiency Study of Low-dose IL-2 Treatment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02084238
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-03-11
Start date
2013-08-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2020-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

SLE, IL-2

Brief summary

This clinical study will test the efficacy and safety of low dose IL-2 treatment in Systemic lupus erythematosus.

Detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune syndrome affecting various organs. While available therapies, such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents have improved the outcome of patients, there remains a significant unmet need for safe and more effective treatments. Dysfunction of regulatory T (Treg) cells has been detected in diverse autoimmune diseases, which can be promoted by interleukin-2 (IL-2). We hypothesized that low-dose IL-2 could be a novel therapy in active SLE patients. This is a single center, uncontrolled, open-label study to assess the efficacy/safety of low dose IL-2 plus standard therapy in active SLE. Methods: Each SLE patients (n=40) with Scores\>=8 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (AELENA) version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) that was refractory or relaps to glucocorticoid therapy received low-dose IL-2 (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day rest, another cycle started) for 3-6 cycles according to the situation of the disease. The end points were safety and clinical and immunologic response. Expected Results: This trail will define low-dose IL-2 plus standard therapy is efficacy and safety with active lupus patients, which could be relevant to the amelioration the abnormity of T help cells in SLE patients.

Interventions

DRUGInterleukin-2

Patients receive low dose recombinant human Interleukin-2(HrIL-2) (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day rest, another cycle started) for 3-6 courses according to the situation of the disease.

Sponsors

Monash University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of SLE. * Under standard treatment (≥ 2 months) at the time of inclusion * Background treatment failed to control flares or to permit prednisone tapering * With at least one of the following manifestations: thrombocytopenia, disease-associated rash, mouth ulcer, non-infectious type of fever, active vasculitis, renal disorder(proteinuria\>0.5g/day), neuropsychiatric SLE. * Positive for at least one of the following laboratory tests: ANA\>1:160, anti-dsDNA, immunoglobulin\>20g/L, decreased C3 or C4, leukopenia\<3×10\^9/L, thrombocytopenia\<100×10\^9/L; * SLE disease activity index(SLEDAI) ≥ 8. * Negative HIV test. * Negative for hepatitis B and C virus. * Written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Sever chronic liver, kidney, lung or heart dysfunction; (heart failure (≥ grade III NYHA), hepatic insufficiency (transaminases\> 3N) ) * Serious infection such as bacteremia, sepsis; * Cancer or history of cancer cured for less than five years (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or Basocellular carcinoma); * High-dose steroid pulse therapy (\>1.5mg/kg) or IV bolus of corticosteroids in the last 2 months. * History of administration of rituximab or other biologics; * Purified protein derivative (tuberculin) \>10mm * Mental disorder or any other chronic illness or drug-abuse that could interfere with the ability to comply with the protocol or to give information; * Inability to comply with IL-2 treatment regimen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)week 2,week 4,week 6,week 8,week 10SRI response was defined as (1) a ≥ 4-point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, (2) no new BILAG A score or ≤ 1 new BILAG B score, and (3) no deterioration from baseline in the physician's global assessment by ≥ 0.3 points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immunological Responsesweek 0 and week 10Analysis regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells , interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing helper T (Th17) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells before and during IL-2 treatment. P values below 0.05 are considered statistically significant in this study.
The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE Patientsweek 0 and week 10Laboratory measures were detected, including, C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA titres.
SELENA SLEDAI Scoreweek 0, week 10Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) change. The higher the score represent the worse of the disease. The total score ranges from 0 to 105 points, score\> 8 means the disease is moderate-to-severe active.
Number of Relapses24 weeksRelapses mean that if the patient's SELENA SLEDAI Score is lower than 4 during the treatment, while the SELENA SLEDAI Score increase after stopping using the study drugs in 3 months.
Safety Assessmentup to Day 180Adverse events includes injection site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, infection, fever, tumor, cardiovascular event,drug-induced liver and kidney damage.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between August 2013 and May 2014,38 patients completed three cycles of recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) in Dept. of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital. Patients were permitted changes in background therapy according to the treating physician's advice.

Pre-assignment details

All the patients showed poor efficacy at least 4 weeks of stable routine treatment at the time of enrollment. Two of the enrolled patients withdrew from the study at week 8: one changed to the belimumab treatment by personal preference; the other elected changed to the cyclophosphamide treatment to reduce the frequency of hospital visits.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interleukin-2
Interleukin-2 to treat activated SLE. Interleukin-2: Patients receive low dose recombinant human Interleukin-2(HrIL-2) (1 million units every other day subcutaneously (HrIL-2 1X 106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day rest, another cycle started) for 3-6 courses according to the situation of the disease.
38
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterleukin-2
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants
Age, Continuous31 years
Region of Enrollment
China
38 partiipants
SELENA-SLEDAI score11.35 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.71
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)

SRI response was defined as (1) a ≥ 4-point reduction in SELENA-SLEDAI score, (2) no new BILAG A score or ≤ 1 new BILAG B score, and (3) no deterioration from baseline in the physician's global assessment by ≥ 0.3 points.

Time frame: week 2,week 4,week 6,week 8,week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SRI ResultsNumber of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)Week 212 participants
SRI ResultsNumber of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)Week427 participants
SRI ResultsNumber of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)Week 633 participants
SRI ResultsNumber of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)week 834 participants
SRI ResultsNumber of Participants Who Were SLE Responders (SRI)week 1034 participants
Secondary

Immunological Responses

Analysis regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells , interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing helper T (Th17) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells before and during IL-2 treatment. P values below 0.05 are considered statistically significant in this study.

Time frame: week 0 and week 10

Population: regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells , interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing helper T (Th17) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
SRI ResultsImmunological ResponsesWeek 010.6 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
SRI ResultsImmunological ResponsesWeek 1017.5 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Immunological Responses 2Immunological ResponsesWeek 03.93 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Immunological Responses 2Immunological ResponsesWeek 102.1 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Immunological Responses 3Immunological ResponsesWeek 04.09 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Immunological Responses 3Immunological ResponsesWeek 102.63 Percentage of CD4+ T cells
Comparison: Comparing the data between baseline and week 10.p-value: <0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Relapses

Relapses mean that if the patient's SELENA SLEDAI Score is lower than 4 during the treatment, while the SELENA SLEDAI Score increase after stopping using the study drugs in 3 months.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary

Safety Assessment

Adverse events includes injection site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, infection, fever, tumor, cardiovascular event,drug-induced liver and kidney damage.

Time frame: up to Day 180

Secondary

SELENA SLEDAI Score

Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) change. The higher the score represent the worse of the disease. The total score ranges from 0 to 105 points, score\> 8 means the disease is moderate-to-severe active.

Time frame: week 0, week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
SRI ResultsSELENA SLEDAI ScoreWeek 011.35 scoreStandard Deviation 3.71
SRI ResultsSELENA SLEDAI ScoreWeek 103.775 scoreStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE Patients

Laboratory measures were detected, including, C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA titres.

Time frame: week 0 and week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
SRI ResultsThe Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 00.42 g/L
SRI ResultsThe Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 100.75 g/L
Immunological Responses 2The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 00.075 g/L
Immunological Responses 2The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 100.157 g/L
Immunological Responses 3The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 0417.9 g/L
Immunological Responses 3The Immunologic Impact of Low Dose IL-2 Treatment in SLE PatientsWeek 10105.1 g/L

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026