Skip to content

In Vitro Assessment of a Breath-synchronized Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Non Invasive Ventilation

In Vitro Comparison of Continuous and Breath-synchronized Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Non Invasive Ventilation: Analysis of Inhaled and Lost Doses.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02084043
Acronym
Synchro-Neb
Enrollment
3
Registered
2014-03-11
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, COPD, Cystic Fibrosis, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Diseases

Keywords

aerosol delivery, vibrating mesh nebulizer, breath-actuated nebulizer, non invasive ventilation, bilevel ventilator, single limb circuit ventilator, Amikacin

Brief summary

Using an adult lung bench model of non invasive ventilation, the aim of the study is to compare an experimental system of breath-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer to a conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during non invasive ventilation in terms of inhaled and lost doses.

Interventions

DRUGNebulization of Amikacin during NIV (RR: 15 cycles/minute)

500 mg/4 mL Amikacin nebulized using vibrating mesh nebulizer associated with a single limb bilevel ventilator. The nebulizations are considered as finished when there is no visible evidence of nebulization for a period of 30 seconds. The NIV is set with an IPAP of 15 cmH2O and EPAP of 5 cmH2O. The lung model is simulated with a respiratory rate of 15 cycles/minute

DRUGNebulization of Amikacin during NIV (RR: 25 cycles/minute)

500 mg/4 mL Amikacin nebulized using vibrating mesh nebulizer associated with a single limb bilevel ventilator. The nebulizations are considered as finished when there is no visible evidence of nebulization for a period of 30 seconds. The NIV is set with an IPAP of 15 cmH2O and EPAP of 5 cmH2O. The lung model is simulated with a respiratory rate of 25 cycles/minute

Sponsors

Université Catholique de Louvain
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER
School of Gestion and Engineering Vaud, Switzerland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital St Luc, Brussels
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Not applicable (in vitro study)

Exclusion criteria

* hypersensitivity (allergic) reactions to aminoglycosides

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inhaled doseafter 24 hoursThe inhaled dose assessed by residual gravimetric method

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Expiratory wasted doseafter 24 hoursThe dose expelled in the ambient air through the exhalation port assessed by residual gravimetric method

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated lost doseafter 24 hoursThe dose lost into the circuit (nebulizer included) assessed by residual gravimetric method

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026