Skip to content

Project CHOICE: Efficacy Testing of CHOICE and CHOICE+Normative Feedback Interventions

PROJECT CHOICE: Efficacy Testing of Motivational Interviewing (MI) for Adolescents Referred for Substance Use Concerns

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02083523
Acronym
CHOICE
Enrollment
48
Registered
2014-03-11
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2014-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Substance-related Disorders

Keywords

Motivational Interview, normative feedback, adolescents

Brief summary

This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL.

Detailed description

This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL. The study will have two arms: one group will receive the standard CHOICE Motivational Interview (MI) while the second group will receive the CHOICE Motivational Interview with a Normative Feedback component, called CHOICE+ (CHOICE Plus). The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcomes between those that receive the standard CHOICE and those that receive the CHOICE+ MI.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interview with Normative Feedback

NOrmative Feedback (NF) contrasts and individual's substance use to available norms for one's reference group (i.e., descriptive norms.) Essentially, NF highlights how an individual's behavior is non-normative, which in turn, is thought to lead to reduced substance use.

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interview

The Motivational Interview (MI) addresses ambivalence about change. It's effects are mediated by how well counselors evoke change talk, or in-session client utterances about the: need for; commitment to; ability to; or steps needed, to change.

Sponsors

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Youth 13-19 years of age (and their parents or legal guardians if their youth has been referred for an assessment with the Prairie Center counseling staff.) * referred for an assessment to see if they need substance use disorder treatment * have used substances on 13 or more days out of the past 90 days or scored higher than 2 on the CRAFT assessment. -

Exclusion criteria

* Low cognitive functioning

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Readiness to ChangeDay One% Readiness to Change was measured immediately following receipt of the intervention session.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Days of Substance Use Treatment3 months post intake

Other

MeasureTime frame
Substance Use Frequency3 months post intake

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026