Skip to content

Lord´s Procedure Versus Sclerotherapy for Testicular Hydrocele; a Randomized Controlled Study

Lord´s Procedure Versus Sclerotherapy for Testicular Hydrocele; a Randomized Controlled Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02082613
Enrollment
200
Registered
2014-03-10
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2016-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Testicular Hydrocele

Keywords

Testicular hydrocele, Hydrocele, Sclerotherapy, Surgery, Complications

Brief summary

This study will compare a minimal invasive operation in local anesthesia with sclerotherapy for symptomatic testicular hydrocele within 6 months after randomization. Thirty days complication rates will be assessed. The hypothesis is that surgery will lead to faster cure while sclerotherapy would be cheaper and have less complications.

Detailed description

Testicular hydrocele is a common disorder even though it´s exact prevalence is unknown. In areas with filariasis it´s endemic. Hydrocele is a benign condition where fluid accumulates in between two layers of tunica vaginalis (embryologically, the peritoneum), surrounding the testicle. The cause is unknown but inflammatory conditions is believed to induce these changes. The pathogenesis of hydrocele is believed to be a nonbalanced secretion and resorption of fluid. Diagnosis of hydrocele is easy since the patient presents with an enlarged scrotum and clinical investigation including palpation and transillumination of the scrotum confirms the diagnosis. A scrotal ultrasound might be indicated to rule out a malignancy or if the diagnosis is unclear. Treatment for hydrocele is only indicated when the patient has symptoms since all treatment modalities carries risk of complications, such as hematoma, infection, pain and even infertility concerns has been raised. Operative management is considered the golden standard of treatment when considering recurrence but less invasive procedures such as sclerotherapy is frequently used, mainly due to cost and complications issues. Lord´s procedure has in several series shown low frequency of complications and excellent recurrence rates. However, Lord´s procedure and sclerotherapy has not been tested head to head and the optimal treatment for hydrocele is yet to be determined. This study aims to compare these techniques and evaluate the results within 1 year after randomization on cure, complication rates and various secondary descriptive outcomes. The investigators aim to adhere to CONSORT.

Interventions

PROCEDURELord´s procedure
PROCEDURESclerotherapy

Sponsors

Umeå University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic testicular hydrocele, with more than 2 points on a validated inguinal botherscore (Inguinal Pain Questionnaire, IPQ) * More than 40ml of hydrocele fluid * Age\>40 years * Completed reproduction * Oral and written consent to participate in the study * American Association of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade≤ 3

Exclusion criteria

* Other ipsilateral scrotal disease (tumour, ongoing inflammatory disease of the scrotum,) * Ongoing urinary infection * Ipsilateral inguinal hernia * Ascites * Paternity wish * Not possible to drain the hydrocele fully * Opaque fluid drained on emptying the hydrocele * Bilateral hydrocele where both sides has symptom score more than 2p on IPQ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cure from symptomatic hydrocele within 6 months of randomizationEvery 3 months until 6months from randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative complicationsWithin 30 days from treatment

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean number of treatments until cure6 months
Mean days on sick leave30 days
Proportion symptomatic scrotal complaints without recurrence of hydrocele6 months
Description of inconvenience grade of patients with hydroceleFirst visitThe inconvenience grade for patients presenting in a urological out patient setting, reported as a 7 scale question, (adopted from Inguinal Pain questionnaire).
Proportion cured by solely emptying the hydrocele2-3monthsPatients who are randomized to surgery will undergo an emptying of the hydrocele to allow for clinical examination of the testicle. The amount will be measured and inspected. No sclerotherapy will be instilled. If patients are cured by this simple measure, they will be classified as cured by this and analyzed as cured by surgery, in intention to treat analysis.
Proportion treatment failure6 monthsThe proportion of men who in this combined outcome showed either recurrence, significant symptoms but refuses further treatment, residual symptoms without hydrocele or patient preference to change treatment modality, converting from one treatment arm to the other.

Countries

Norway, Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactKarl-Johan Lundström, M.D
karl-johan.lundstrom@jll.se004663153000
Backup ContactPär Nordin, Ph.D, M.D
par.nordin@jll.se004663153000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026