Skip to content

A Feasibility Study Looking at the Use of Glibenclamide and metfoRmin Versus stAndard Care in gEstational diabeteS

A Feasibility Study Looking at the Use of Glibenclamide and metfoRmin Versus stAndard Care in gEstational diabeteS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02080377
Acronym
GRACES
Enrollment
23
Registered
2014-03-06
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gestational Diabetes, Pregnancy

Keywords

Pregnancy, Gestational diabetes, Glycaemic control, Metformin

Brief summary

The aim of this open label feasibility study is to determine recruitment rates to a randomised trial of glibenclamide compared with insulin (both in addition to maximum tolerated metformin) for the treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). This feasibility trial will inform the design of a future substantive multicentre trial to test the hypothesis that combination therapy with glibenclamide and metformin could reduce the number of pregnant women with GDM who require insulin and would be superior to metformin and insulin in terms of acceptability and cost effectiveness. Women with GDM who have failed monotherapy with metformin will be recruited and randomised to either receive glibenclamide (test arm) or standard care with insulin, both in addition to their maximum tolerated dose of metformin. Patients will be recruited from three of the antenatal clinics. This is a feasibility study in preparation for a large multicentre randomised trial to test the hypothesis that the addition of glibenclamide to metformin (combination therapy) could reduce the number of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, without compromising glycaemic control or other clinical outcomes. The investigators hypothesise that combination therapy with metformin and glibenclamide is likely to be preferable to metformin and insulin in terms of acceptability and cost.

Interventions

DRUGGlibenclamide
DRUGInsulin

Sponsors

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes who fail to achieve adequate glycaemic control on maximum tolerated dose metformin * Inadequate glycaemic control is defined according to the SIGN 116 guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women requiring insulin prior to 20 weeks gestation or after 36 weeks gestation. * Pregnant women not taking at least 500mg metformin daily. * Patients with suspected Type 1 diabetes mellitus presenting in pregnancy. * Women with allergies to either glibenclamide or insulin or any of their excipients. * Women with any contraindications to sulfonylurea therapy. * Women unable to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of women willing to be randomised2 years* Retention - proportion of women randomised who remain in the study to provide outcomes * Adherence - proportion of clinicians who adhere to the treatment regimen(s)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycaemic control2 weeklySafety - number of hypoglycaemic episodes needing treatment, any other adverse events
Patient satisfaction36-38 weeks gestationassessed by visual analogue scale
Clinical outcomes36 weeksChange in maternal weight between booking and 36 weeks
Clinical outcome40 weeksMode and gestation of delivery.
Clinical Outcome40 weeksBirthweight centile (adjusted for sex and gestation at birth)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026