Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Azeliragon (TTP488) in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease

Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center Registration Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Azeliragon (TTP488) in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease Receiving Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and/or Memantine

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02080364
Acronym
STEADFAST
Enrollment
880
Registered
2014-03-06
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2018-06-01
Last updated
2021-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, RAGE, ADAS-cog, CDR-sb

Brief summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azeliragon in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Patients will receive either azeliragon or placebo with a patient's participation lasting approximately 18 months.

Interventions

Azeliragon 5mg administered orally, once daily for 18 months

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo administered orally, once daily for 18 months

Sponsors

vTv Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer Disease (AD) with documented evidence of progression of disease * Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 21-26, inclusive * Clinical Dementia Rating global score of 0.5 or 1 * Rosen-Modified Hachinski Ischemia Score less than or equal to 4 * Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consistent with the diagnosis of probable AD * Concurrent use of cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine with stable dose for at least 3 months prior to randomization * Caregiver willing to participate and be able to attend clinic visits with patient * Ability to ingest oral medications

Exclusion criteria

* Significant neurological or psychiatric disease other than Alzheimer's disease * Participants with evidence or history of severe drug allergies (resulting in dyspnea or severe rash). * Any contraindications to MRI (e.g., clinically significant claustrophobia, non-removable ferromagnetic implants). Patients with contraindications to MRI may undergo computed tomography (CT) on approval by sponsor. * Any contraindications to the FDG-PET study (e.g. allergy to any component of the FDG dose) in the cohort undergoing a PET scan. * Previous exposure to investigational or non-investigational therapies for Alzheimer's disease within 6 months of screening * History of cancer within the last 5 years except adequately treated cervical carcinoma in-situ, cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell cancer, or non-progressive prostate cancer not requiring treatment * Women of childbearing potential * Uncontrolled blood pressure and/or blood pressure above 160/100 * Prescription medical food intended for dietary management of the metabolic processes associated with Alzheimer's disease. * Diagnosis or history of cerebrovascular stroke, severe carotid stenosis, cerebral hemorrhage, intracranial tumor, subarachnoid hemorrhage. * Patients with unstable, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c \> 7.7%) and those requiring insulin.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total ScoreBaseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The ADAS-cog is a structured scale (approximately 40 minutes to complete) that evaluates memory, orientation, attention, reasoning, language and constructional praxis (Rosen, 1984). The ADAS-cog scoring range for the version used in this study is from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The CDR scale is used as a global measure of dementia and is completed by a clinician in the setting of detailed knowledge of the individual patient collected from interviews with the patient and caregiver (Berg, 1988). The CDR describes 5 degrees of impairment in performance on each of 6 categories including memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. CDR ratings are 0 for healthy individuals, 0.5 for questionable dementia and 1, 2 and 3 for mild, moderate and severe dementia as defined in the CDR scale. The scores for each category can also be summed and this is known as the sum of box score (CSR-SB). Sum of box scores range from 0 to 18 with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The ADCS-ADL is an activity of daily living inventory developed by the ADCS to assess functional performance in participants with AD (Galasko et al., 1997). Informants are queried via a structured interview format as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the preceding 4 weeks, as well as their level of performance. Scores range from 0-78 with lower scores indicating greater functional impairment.
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The MMSE is a brief 30-point test that is used to assess cognition (Folstein, 1975). It is commonly used to screen for dementia. In the time span of about 10 minutes, it samples various functions, including arithmetic, memory and orientation. Scores range from 0-30 with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The NPI is a well-validated, reliable, multi-item instrument to assess psychopathology in AD based on an interview with the caregiver (Cummings et al, 1994). It evaluates both the frequency and severity of 12 behavioral areas including delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria (depression) anxiety, agitation/aggression, euphoria, disinhibition, irritability, lability, apathy, aberrant motor behavior, appetite and eating changes and night-time behaviors. Frequency assessments range from 1 (occasionally, less than once per week) to 4 (very frequently, once or more per day or continuously) as well as severity (1= mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Distress is rated by the study partner or caregiver and ranges from 0 (no distress) to 5 (very severe or extreme). The overall score and the score for each subscale are the product of severity and frequency. Scores range from 0-144 with higher scores indicating a greater presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Volumetric MeasuresBaseline and 18 monthsPercent of Total Hippocampus Atrophy to Intracranial Volume
Change From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The COWAT is a measure of verbal fluency in which the participant is asked to generate orally as many words as possible that begin with the letters F, A, and S, excluding proper names and different forms of the same word. (Borkowski, 1967, Loonstra 2001) For each letter, the participant is allowed one minute to generate the words. Performance is measured by the total number of correct words produced summed across the three letters. Perseverations (i.e., repetitions of a correct word) and intrusions (i.e., words not beginning with the designated letter) are noted.
Change From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)Study participants are given one minute to provide exemplars of the category 'animals'.
Change From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)The DEMQOL-Proxy questionnaire is a validated and reliable questionnaire that is interview administered and completed by the caregiver about the patient's health related quality of life (Smith et al, 2005). It consists of 31 items representing 5 domains (daily activities and looking after yourself, health and well-being, cognitive functioning, social relationships, and self-concept) and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. Scores range 31-124 with higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Normalized Mean Composite SUVR of the 5 RegionsBaseline to 18 monthsExtent and severity of brain hypometabolism was assessed centrally at Baseline and Month 18. SUVR PET was designed to make use of FreeSurfer-based segmentations of the brain obtained using the 3DT1 MRI. Following the methods published by Landau and Jagust (Landau SM, Annals of Neurology 2012) and described on the ADNI website (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/pet-analysis-method/), regions were defined in native patient space on the 3DT1 MRI acquired at the Baseline visit and at Month 18 visit. An SUVR measure was computed regionally over five sub-regions (anterior/posterior cingulate, temporal, parietal, frontal and hippocampal areas), normalized to activity in the cerebral white matter. These sub-regions were selected to optimize sensitivity in longitudinal studies. This outcome measure presents the change from baseline in the normalized mean composite SUVR of the 5 regions. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease (worsening) in brain glucose metabolism/utilization.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The A-Study was conducted from April 2015 through April 2018 in the United States and Canada. The B-Study was conducted from September 2016 through June 2018 in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1733 subjects underwent screening procedures for determination of eligibility for participation across the A- and B- Studies. 880 subjects were eligible and were randomized and assigned to treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A-Study: Azeliragon
Azeliragon 5 mg once daily
195
A-Study: Placebo
Placebo once daily
206
B-Study: Azeliragon
Azeliragon 5 mg once daily
246
B-Study: Placebo
Placebo capsule once daily
228
Total875

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Baseline PeriodOther0110
Baseline PeriodProtocol Violation2100
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event10151114
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up2350
Treatment PeriodOther14122116
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation5351
Treatment PeriodStudy Terminated by Sponsor00180183
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject16161510

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalB-Study: PlaceboB-Study: AzeliragonA-Study: PlaceboA-Study: Azeliragon
Age, Continuous74.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
74.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.55
74.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13
Apo E4 status
Heterozygous
382 Participants105 Participants115 Participants79 Participants83 Participants
Apo E4 status
Homozygous
91 Participants18 Participants31 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Apo E4 status
Non-carrier
388 Participants99 Participants96 Participants98 Participants95 Participants
Apo E4 status
Not reported
14 Participants6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Background AD Medication
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
542 Participants145 Participants156 Participants124 Participants117 Participants
Background AD Medication
Both Memantine and Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
262 Participants60 Participants71 Participants66 Participants65 Participants
Background AD Medication
Memantine
69 Participants22 Participants19 Participants16 Participants12 Participants
Background AD Medication
Not recorded
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Baseline ADAS-cog16.05 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.424
16.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.295
16.94 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.623
15.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.427
15.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.186
Baseline ADCS-ADL67.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.001
67.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.568
66.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.142
67.37 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
67.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67
Baseline CDR-Sum of Boxes4.34 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.645
4.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.57
4.64 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.585
4.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.623
4.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.747
Baseline MMSE23.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.611
23.41 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.701
23.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.513
23.22 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.522
23.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.733
Education Level
Associates Degree
66 Participants21 Participants14 Participants14 Participants17 Participants
Education Level
Bachelor's Degree
202 Participants55 Participants64 Participants39 Participants44 Participants
Education Level
Doctoral Degree
42 Participants11 Participants11 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Education Level
High School
291 Participants79 Participants86 Participants65 Participants61 Participants
Education Level
Master's Degree
101 Participants25 Participants29 Participants26 Participants21 Participants
Education Level
Other (trainings, certifications)
43 Participants6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants15 Participants
Education Level
Some college
130 Participants31 Participants34 Participants33 Participants32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants15 Participants8 Participants23 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
802 Participants213 Participants238 Participants183 Participants168 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
16 Participants3 Participants6 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants5 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
824 Participants220 Participants231 Participants194 Participants179 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
15 participants7 participants8 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
84 participants18 participants16 participants25 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
16 participants7 participants9 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
9 participants3 participants6 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
46 participants22 participants24 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
47 participants27 participants20 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
558 participants144 participants163 participants181 participants170 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
402 Participants107 Participants107 Participants91 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
473 Participants121 Participants139 Participants115 Participants98 Participants
Years since AD diagnosis2.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.153
1.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.871
2.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.932
2.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.414
2.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.389

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 4415 / 434
other
Total, other adverse events
320 / 441324 / 434
serious
Total, serious adverse events
70 / 44167 / 434

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score

The ADAS-cog is a structured scale (approximately 40 minutes to complete) that evaluates memory, orientation, attention, reasoning, language and constructional praxis (Rosen, 1984). The ADAS-cog scoring range for the version used in this study is from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. B-Study excludes data from visits occurring after A-Study results announcement on 09 Apr 2018. ADAS-cog was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score3.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score3.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score3.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-cog) Total Score2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
p-value: 0.3386Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1992Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)

The CDR scale is used as a global measure of dementia and is completed by a clinician in the setting of detailed knowledge of the individual patient collected from interviews with the patient and caregiver (Berg, 1988). The CDR describes 5 degrees of impairment in performance on each of 6 categories including memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. CDR ratings are 0 for healthy individuals, 0.5 for questionable dementia and 1, 2 and 3 for mild, moderate and severe dementia as defined in the CDR scale. The scores for each category can also be summed and this is known as the sum of box score (CSR-SB). Sum of box scores range from 0 to 18 with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. B-Study excludes data from visits occurring after A-Study results announcement on 09 Apr 2018. CDR-sb was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-sb)0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.9394Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)

The ADCS-ADL is an activity of daily living inventory developed by the ADCS to assess functional performance in participants with AD (Galasko et al., 1997). Informants are queried via a structured interview format as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the preceding 4 weeks, as well as their level of performance. Scores range from 0-78 with lower scores indicating greater functional impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. B-Study excludes data from visits occurring after A-Study results announcement on 09 Apr 2018. ADCS-ADL was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)-5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.85
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL)-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)

Study participants are given one minute to provide exemplars of the category 'animals'.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. NPI was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)-1.7 Total Acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 4.45
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)-1.3 Total Acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 4.26
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)-1.5 Total Acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 3.8
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Category Fluency Test (CFT)9.7 Total Acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 146.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)

The COWAT is a measure of verbal fluency in which the participant is asked to generate orally as many words as possible that begin with the letters F, A, and S, excluding proper names and different forms of the same word. (Borkowski, 1967, Loonstra 2001) For each letter, the participant is allowed one minute to generate the words. Performance is measured by the total number of correct words produced summed across the three letters. Perseverations (i.e., repetitions of a correct word) and intrusions (i.e., words not beginning with the designated letter) are noted.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. NPI was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)-2.0 Total acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 9.61
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)-0.1 Total acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 8.92
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)-1.8 Total acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 8.12
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Continuous Oral Word Association Task (COWAT)-0.8 Total acceptable WordsStandard Deviation 8.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)

The DEMQOL-Proxy questionnaire is a validated and reliable questionnaire that is interview administered and completed by the caregiver about the patient's health related quality of life (Smith et al, 2005). It consists of 31 items representing 5 domains (daily activities and looking after yourself, health and well-being, cognitive functioning, social relationships, and self-concept) and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. Scores range 31-124 with higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. DEMQOL was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.55
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Volumetric Measures

Percent of Total Hippocampus Atrophy to Intracranial Volume

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months

Population: Number of subjects with paired Baseline and Month 18 MRIs

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Volumetric Measures-0.016 percentage of Total Hippocampus AtrophyStandard Error 0.001
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Volumetric Measures-0.014 percentage of Total Hippocampus AtrophyStandard Error 0.001
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

The MMSE is a brief 30-point test that is used to assess cognition (Folstein, 1975). It is commonly used to screen for dementia. In the time span of about 10 minutes, it samples various functions, including arithmetic, memory and orientation. Scores range from 0-30 with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. B-Study excludes data from visits occurring after A-Study results announcement on 09 Apr 2018. MMSE was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

The NPI is a well-validated, reliable, multi-item instrument to assess psychopathology in AD based on an interview with the caregiver (Cummings et al, 1994). It evaluates both the frequency and severity of 12 behavioral areas including delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria (depression) anxiety, agitation/aggression, euphoria, disinhibition, irritability, lability, apathy, aberrant motor behavior, appetite and eating changes and night-time behaviors. Frequency assessments range from 1 (occasionally, less than once per week) to 4 (very frequently, once or more per day or continuously) as well as severity (1= mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Distress is rated by the study partner or caregiver and ranges from 0 (no distress) to 5 (very severe or extreme). The overall score and the score for each subscale are the product of severity and frequency. Scores range from 0-144 with higher scores indicating a greater presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and 18 months (A-Study); baseline and 12 months (B-Study)

Population: Full Analysis Set (all randomized subjects who receive study medication and have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment) with Month 18 (A-Study) or Month 12 (B-Study) data. B-Study excludes data from visits occurring after A-Study results announcement on 09 Apr 2018. NPI was not reported / not valid for some subject visits; therefore, the number analyzed is smaller than overall number.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.53
B-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.24
B-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Normalized Mean Composite SUVR of the 5 Regions

Extent and severity of brain hypometabolism was assessed centrally at Baseline and Month 18. SUVR PET was designed to make use of FreeSurfer-based segmentations of the brain obtained using the 3DT1 MRI. Following the methods published by Landau and Jagust (Landau SM, Annals of Neurology 2012) and described on the ADNI website (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/pet-analysis-method/), regions were defined in native patient space on the 3DT1 MRI acquired at the Baseline visit and at Month 18 visit. An SUVR measure was computed regionally over five sub-regions (anterior/posterior cingulate, temporal, parietal, frontal and hippocampal areas), normalized to activity in the cerebral white matter. These sub-regions were selected to optimize sensitivity in longitudinal studies. This outcome measure presents the change from baseline in the normalized mean composite SUVR of the 5 regions. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease (worsening) in brain glucose metabolism/utilization.

Time frame: Baseline to 18 months

Population: Analyzed as part of an optional FDG-PET substudy

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
A-Study: AzeliragonChange From Baseline in the Normalized Mean Composite SUVR of the 5 Regions-0.0304 SUVR ratioStandard Error 0.0039
A-Study: PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized Mean Composite SUVR of the 5 Regions-0.0342 SUVR ratioStandard Error 0.0039

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026