Skip to content

Endovenous Radiofrequency Versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Prospective, Randomized Study of Endovenous Segmental Radiofrequency Versus 1320 nm Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux (RVLAb Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02080013
Enrollment
5
Registered
2014-03-06
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2014-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins

Brief summary

our aim is to compare early outcomes following EVL 1320 nm and segmental RF in a randomized study.

Detailed description

Endovenous Radiofrequency versus Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Interventions

OTHERradiofrequency

ClosureFAST

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18 and 60 years with incompetent GSVs documented on duplex ultrasound (US; B-mode and color Doppler imaging) were eligible

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability30 days

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026