Skip to content

Effect of Amygdala Neurofeedback on Depressive Symptoms and Processing Biases

Effect of Amygdala Neurofeedback on Depressive Symptoms and Processing Biases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02079610
Enrollment
36
Registered
2014-03-06
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Depression, Neurofeedback, Amygdala

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether upregulating the left amygdala during positive autobiographical memory recall via real time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback will lead to an improvement in clinician administered ratings of depressive symptoms. The investigators predict that patients with major depressive disorder receiving left amygdala neurofeedback will increase their amygdala response during positive autobiographical memory recall compared to those receiving control feedback from a region not involved in emotional processing and that this ability will be associated with clinically significant improvement.

Detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Traditional pharmacological and/or psychological interventions are ineffective in up to one-half of patients, and treatments (such as electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation) available for severely ill patients who do not respond to standard interventions are invasive, and associated with potentially significant side effects. Therefore, there is a need to explore and develop novel non-invasive treatments. One such non-invasive method is real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf), which allows a person to see and regulate the fMRI signal from his or her own brain. Emerging evidence suggests rtfMRI-nf has clinical utility in reducing symptoms of chronic pain, tinnitus, and Parkinson's disease. The goal of the current study is to leverage recent advances in rtfMRI-nf to determine whether this procedure can be adapted as treatment for MDD. While amygdala activity is exaggerated in response to negative stimuli in MDD, evidence further suggests that the amygdala response to positive stimuli is attenuated in MDD and normalizes with remission. Therefore, the target for our rtfMRI-nf procedure is the left amygdala. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive rtfMRI-nf from either the left amygdala or the left horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus (HIPS; a region not involved in emotional processing) and to increase the activity within that region to a target level by thinking of positive autobiographical memories. This neurofeedback condition will alternate with periods of rest and counting backwards in order to allow participants to disengage from memory contemplation. A final run without neurofeedback information will be included to determine whether participants can maintain the learned amygdala elevation during positive memory recall in the absence of neurofeedback. Participants will complete two sessions within a one-week period. Clinical ratings will be taken at the time of each scan to determine whether the amygdala rtfMRI-nf procedure results in improvement of depression symptoms, and changes within the emotional regulation network that occur with successful amygdala regulation will be examined. Furthermore, the investigators aim to determine whether the rtfMRI-nf procedure will alter assessments of emotional processing conducted within three days prior to, and following completion of, the rtfMRI-nf procedure. Specific Aim 1: In individuals with MDD, determine the degree to which rtfMRI-nf enhances voluntary control over neural activity in the amygdala, co-modulates other brain regions within the emotion regulation circuitry, and alters depressive symptom severity ratings. * Hypothesis 1.1: MDD participants receiving rtfMRI-nf regarding blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity within their amygdala can learn to voluntarily regulate this activity in response to positive stimuli. MDD participants receiving rtfMRI-nf regarding left amygdala activity will demonstrate greater activity in this region while contemplating positive autobiographical memories (AMs) than MDD participants receiving rtfMRI-nf regarding BOLD activity in the left HIPS, a region not involved in emotion. * Hypothesis 1.2: The investigators hypothesize enhancing control over the amygdala via rtfMRI-nf will increase connectivity strengths between the amygdala and prefrontal regions involved in modulating emotional behavior including the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. * Hypothesis 1.3: The investigators hypothesize participants showing the greatest enhancement of amygdala activity in response to rtfMRI-nf also will show the greatest improvement in depressive symptom severity ratings at the end of the study. Specific Aim 2: In MDD patients, determine the degree to which rtfMRI-nf from the amygdala restores a normative mood-congruent processing bias during the processing of emotionally valenced stimuli. * Hypothesis 2.1: During the performance of a backward masking task in which emotional faces are presented below conscious awareness, the investigators hypothesize MDD participants will initially show a processing bias toward negative stimuli in the amygdala that will reverse to a processing bias toward positive stimuli in participants receiving active vs HIPS rtfMRI-nf * Hypothesis 2.2: The investigators hypothesize that MDD patients will initially show a mood-congruent processing bias toward negative stimuli on the P1Vital Emotional Test Battery that will reverse to a bias toward positive stimuli following amygdala (vs HIPS) rtfMRI-nf. Results from this project will lead to new insights into the plastic neurobiological mechanisms that govern recovery from MDD and promote novel, non-invasive approaches to MDD treatment.

Interventions

Participants are shown activity from their left amygdala in real time and are instructed to increase the level of activity in that region by thinking of positive autobiographical memories.

Participants are shown activity from their left horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus in real time and are instructed to increase the level of activity in that region by thinking of positive autobiographical memories.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder * right handed * adult aged 18-55 * currently depressed

Exclusion criteria

* clinically significant or unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, neurological, gastrointestinal illness or unstable medical disorder * met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for alcohol and/or substance abuse or substance dependence (other than nicotine) within 12 months prior to screening * endorse suicidal intent or have made a suicide attempt within the preceding three months * history of traumatic brain injury * inability to complete MRI scan due to claustrophobia or general MRI exclusions (e.g., shrapnel inside body) * current pregnancy or breast feeding * a primary language other than English * received psychotropic drugs for at least 3 weeks (8 weeks for fluoxetine) prior to scanning (Effective medications will not be discontinued for the purposes of the study)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 Weeksbaseline and 2 weeksDepression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on MADRS are from from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 Weeksbaseline and 2 weeksDepression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on BDI are from from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 13 - normal /symptom absent 14 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 28 - moderate depression \>29 - severe depression
Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 Weeksbaseline and 2 weeksDepression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on HDRS are from from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 7 - normal /symptom absent 8 to 16 - mild depression 17 to 23 - moderate depression \>24 - severe depression

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: Amygdala
Amygdala neurofeedback - attempt to upregulate the left amygdala during positive autobiographical memory recall via real time fMRI neurofeedback from the amygdala. Two sessions will be performed one week apart. real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Amygdala: Participants are shown activity from their left amygdala in real time and are instructed to increase the level of activity in that region by thinking of positive autobiographical memories.
19
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPS
HIPS neurofeedback - attempt to upregulate the left horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus (HIPS), a region not involved in emotional processing, during positive autobiographical memory recall via real time fMRI neurofeedback from the HIPS. Two sessions will be performed one week apart. real-time fMRI neurofeedback: HIPS: Participants are shown activity from their left horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus in real time and are instructed to increase the level of activity in that region by thinking of positive autobiographical memories.
17
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReal-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaReal-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSTotal
Age, Continuous32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale23.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93
23.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
23.61 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.32
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 Count of participants17 Count of participants36 Count of participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 Weeks

Depression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on MADRS are from from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression

Time frame: baseline and 2 weeks

Population: 1 participant in each group did not complete all study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 WeeksMADRS absolute score at Baseline23.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.93
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 WeeksMADRS absolute score at Follow-Up11.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.02
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 WeeksMADRS absolute score at Baseline23.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.71
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale at 2 WeeksMADRS absolute score at Follow-Up21.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.09
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 Weeks

Depression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on BDI are from from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 13 - normal /symptom absent 14 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 28 - moderate depression \>29 - severe depression

Time frame: baseline and 2 weeks

Population: One participant in each group did not complete all study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 WeeksBDI absolute score at Baseline27.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 WeeksBDI absolute score at Follow-up16.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 WeeksBDI absolute score at Baseline26.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline Beck Depression Inventory at 2 WeeksBDI absolute score at Follow-up24.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
p-value: 0.03Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 Weeks

Depression symptom severity rating scale. The overall score ranges on HDRS are from from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 7 - normal /symptom absent 8 to 16 - mild depression 17 to 23 - moderate depression \>24 - severe depression

Time frame: baseline and 2 weeks

Population: One participant in each group did not complete all study visits

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 WeeksHDRS absolute score at Baseline19.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: AmygdalaChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 WeeksHDRS absolute score at Follow-up10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.06
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 WeeksHDRS absolute score at Baseline19.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.39
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback: HIPSChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 2 WeeksHDRS absolute score at Follow-up17.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.99
p-value: 0.01Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026