Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine safety and effectiveness, as measured by changes in pain, disability, patient satisfaction, and claudicatory symptoms, at 6 months following treatment with the Totalis™ Direct Decompression System or Sham Comparator Surgical Procedure in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
Detailed description
Subjects suffering from symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to a radiographically-confirmed diagnosis of central canal stenosis, with or without mild or moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1 to L5 who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, including ≥6 months of non-operative management. Patients included in the clinical investigation will return for follow-up visits at 1 week for safety evaluation, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post-treatment to collect data for evaluation of safety and effectiveness.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects greater than or equal to 55 years of age * Neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) symptoms defined generally as leg/buttock/ groin pain and/or paresthesias that are exacerbated with standing and walking and relieved by flexion * VAS leg symptom severity \>50 (in either leg) during episodes of neurogenic claudication * Subjects who are able to walk a minimum of 50 feet without experiencing NIC symptoms * Diagnosis of central canal spinal stenosis, with or without mild to moderate lateral recess stenosis, at one or two levels from L1-L5 with radiologic evidence * Subjects with persistent lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms that, during the course of the last year, have been unresponsive to a minimum of 6 months of conservative therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Significant back, buttock or leg pain from causes other than lumbar central canal stenosis * Axial back pain only * Severe foraminal stenosis at index level(s) and/or symptomatic foraminal stenosis at any lumbar level * Severe lateral recess stenosis * Lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels determined pre-operatively to require surgical intervention * Prior decompressive surgery at index level (s) or fusion at any lumbar level * Epidural steroid or nerve block steroid injection at index level(s) within 6 weeks of baseline assessments * Spondylolisthesis (anterolisthesis or retrolisthesis) greater than grade 1 * Spondylolysis (pars fracture) * Significant degenerative lumbar scoliosis at index level(s) * Morbid obesity * Significant peripheral vascular disease * Active significant co-morbidity * Undergoing immunosuppressive therapy or long-term steroid use * Current spinal cord stimulator or implanted pain pump * Life expectancy less than 2 years * Evidence of substance abuse within the year * Involvement or potential involvement in litigation related to the spine or worker's compensation related to a back and/or leg issue
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes | Baseline and 6 Months | Where clinically significant improvement in outcomes is defined as improvement in any 2 of the 3 domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire ( ZCQ) * Improvement in physical function by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline * Improvement in symptom severity by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline * Patient Satisfaction Score of \< 2.5 points And no interventions of the following nature through 6 months: * Re-operations or revisions at index level(s) intended to treat stenosis * Epidural steroid injection or selective nerve root block at index level(s) And no unblindings |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
180 subjects enrolled; 12 withdrew, leaving 168 subjects randomized & treated.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Totalis Totalis ™ Direct Decompression Procedure | 112 |
| Control Procedure Comparator Surgical Procedure | 56 |
| Total | 168 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed 6 Months | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 1 |
| Modified Intent to Treat Population | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Modified Intent to Treat Population | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Totalis | Control Procedure | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | 70.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 71.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 | 71.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 109 Participants | 54 Participants | 163 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 58 Participants | 36 Participants | 94 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 54 Participants | 20 Participants | 74 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 112 | 0 / 56 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 98 / 112 | 42 / 56 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 19 / 112 | 11 / 56 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes
Where clinically significant improvement in outcomes is defined as improvement in any 2 of the 3 domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire ( ZCQ) * Improvement in physical function by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline * Improvement in symptom severity by ≥ 0.5 points from baseline * Patient Satisfaction Score of \< 2.5 points And no interventions of the following nature through 6 months: * Re-operations or revisions at index level(s) intended to treat stenosis * Epidural steroid injection or selective nerve root block at index level(s) And no unblindings
Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Totalis | Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes | 56.3 percentage of subjects |
| Control Procedure | Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes | 56.0 percentage of subjects |