Skip to content

Effectiveness of WB-EMS Versus HIT-Resistance Training (RT)

Comparison of the Effect of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Versus High Intensity Resistance Exercise Training on Body Composition and Strength in Middle Aged Males

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02078986
Acronym
EMSvsHIT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-03-05
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Sedentary, Untrained

Keywords

Whole-Body-Electromyostimulation, High Intensity Resistance Exercise Training (HIT), Lean Body Mass, Muscle Strength

Brief summary

The main aim of the study is to determine the effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on body composition and muscle strength compared with the golden standard High Intensity Resistance Exercise Training (HIT) in healthy sedentary middle aged males.

Interventions

Supervised WB-EMS, 3 sessions in 2 weeks (1,5 sessions/week) for 14 weeks

Supervised High Intensity Resistance Exercise Training (HIT) 2-3 sessions/week for 14 weeks

Sponsors

Klinikum Nürnberg
CollaboratorOTHER
Benevital Health Park, Herzogenaurach
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* male, 25 to 55 years old * sedentary / untrained * Body Mass Index 20 - 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* absent ≥ 2 weeks during the interventional period * medication or diseases with relevant impact on muscle metabolism * conditions that prevent WB-EMS (e.g. epilepsy, cardiac pacemaker) * severe neurological diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lean Body mass14 weeks (baseline to 14 week follow-up assessment)Lean Body Mass as assessed by Dual Energy x-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) was determined twice, at baseline and after 14 weeks of exercise (WB-EMS or HIT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass14 weeks (baseline to 14 week follow-up assessment)Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASMM) as assessed by DXA was determined at baseline and after 14 weeks of exercise (WB-EMS or HIT)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Isokinetic Muscle Strength of the leg extensors and -flexors14 weeks (baseline to 14 week follow-up assessment)Isokinetic Muscle Strength leg extensors and -flexors as assessed by a an isokinetic leg press was determined at baseline and after 14 weeks of exercise (WB-EMS or HIT).

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026