Skip to content

A Efficacy and Safety Study of Fostamatinib in the Treatment of Persistent/Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study of Fostamatinib Disodium in the Treatment of Persistent/Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02076412
Acronym
FIT
Enrollment
74
Registered
2014-03-03
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2019-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fostamatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of persistent/chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP).

Interventions

Fostamatinib Disodium tablet 100 mg or 150 mg PO bid (morning and evening) over the course of 24 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablet PO bid (morning and evening)

Sponsors

Rigel Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of persistent/chronic ITP for at least 3 months * Average platelet count\< 30,000/µL (and none \> 35,000 unless as a result of rescue therapy) from at least 3 qualifying counts

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia * Uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension * History of coagulopathy including prothrombotic conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Stable Platelet Response of at Least 50,000/µLBaseline to Week 24Stable platelet response by Week 24 defined as a platelet count of at least 50,000/µL on at least 4 of the 6 visits between Weeks 14-24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 24
Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 12Baseline to Week 12Among subjects with a baseline platelet count \< 15,000/μL, achievement of a count ≥ 30,000/μL and at least 20,000/μL above baseline at Week 12.
Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 12Baseline to Week 12Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 12
Frequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the ITP Bleeding Score (IBLS)Baseline to Week 24The ITP Bleeding Scale (IBLS) is an immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)-specific bleeding score used to analyze the correlation of clinical and laboratory platelet variables with bleeding. The IBLS comprises of 11 grades from 0 (none) to 2 (marked bleeding) by history over the previous week or by exam; 2 being worse. These 11 grades include: skin by physical exam, oral by physical exam, skin by history, oral by history, epistaxis, gastrointestinal, urinary, gynecological, pulmonary, intracranial hemorrhage, and subconjunctival hemorrhage. After each grade is scored, the mean value for all 11 grades is calculated (lowest score being 0 and highest score being 2) for each subject visit. LOCF method was used to impute any missing data. The mean of the IBLS scores across visits during the 24-week treatment period was summarized by treatment group using descriptive statistics. A 2-sided, 2-sample t-test was used to test for a difference in means between treatments for this endpoint.
Frequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding ScaleBaseline to Week 24The World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scale is a standardized grading scale created to measure the severity of bleeding. The scale is a clinical investigator-assessed five-point scale with a score range starting at the lowest 0=No bleeding, 1 = Petechiae, 2=Mild blood loss, 3=Gross blood loss, to the worse 4=Debilitating blood loss. The WHO bleeding scale is scored by history over the previous-week or by exam. After each grade is scored, the mean value is calculated (lowest score being 0 \[no bleeding\] to the highest score being 4 \[debilitating blood loss\]) for each visit. LOCF method was used to impute any missing data. The mean of the WHO bleeding scale across visits during the 24-week treatment period was summarized by treatment group using descriptive statistics. A 2-sided, 2-sample t-test was used to test for a difference in means between treatments for this endpoint.
Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Among subjects with a baseline platelet count \< 15,000/μL, achievement of a count ≥ 30,000/μL and at least 20,000/μL above baseline at Week 24

Countries

Austria, Bulgaria, Czechia, Germany, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

74 patients were enrolled from January 2015 to August 2016

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fostamatinib Recipient
Fostamatinib (100 mg PO bid or 150 mg PO bid)
50
Placebo Recipient
Placebo
24
Total74

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo RecipientTotalFostamatinib Recipient
Age, Continuous49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants74 Participants50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants74 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants44 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants30 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 510 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 5118 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 516 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Stable Platelet Response of at Least 50,000/µL

Stable platelet response by Week 24 defined as a platelet count of at least 50,000/µL on at least 4 of the 6 visits between Weeks 14-24

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fostamatinib RecipientNumber of Participants With Stable Platelet Response of at Least 50,000/µL9 Participants
Placebo RecipientNumber of Participants With Stable Platelet Response of at Least 50,000/µL1 Participants
p-value: 0.151995% CI: [0.5, 27.1]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Frequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the ITP Bleeding Score (IBLS)

The ITP Bleeding Scale (IBLS) is an immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)-specific bleeding score used to analyze the correlation of clinical and laboratory platelet variables with bleeding. The IBLS comprises of 11 grades from 0 (none) to 2 (marked bleeding) by history over the previous week or by exam; 2 being worse. These 11 grades include: skin by physical exam, oral by physical exam, skin by history, oral by history, epistaxis, gastrointestinal, urinary, gynecological, pulmonary, intracranial hemorrhage, and subconjunctival hemorrhage. After each grade is scored, the mean value for all 11 grades is calculated (lowest score being 0 and highest score being 2) for each subject visit. LOCF method was used to impute any missing data. The mean of the IBLS scores across visits during the 24-week treatment period was summarized by treatment group using descriptive statistics. A 2-sided, 2-sample t-test was used to test for a difference in means between treatments for this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fostamatinib RecipientFrequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the ITP Bleeding Score (IBLS)0.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
Placebo RecipientFrequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the ITP Bleeding Score (IBLS)0.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
p-value: 0.492795% CI: [-0.05, 0.02]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Frequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale

The World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scale is a standardized grading scale created to measure the severity of bleeding. The scale is a clinical investigator-assessed five-point scale with a score range starting at the lowest 0=No bleeding, 1 = Petechiae, 2=Mild blood loss, 3=Gross blood loss, to the worse 4=Debilitating blood loss. The WHO bleeding scale is scored by history over the previous-week or by exam. After each grade is scored, the mean value is calculated (lowest score being 0 \[no bleeding\] to the highest score being 4 \[debilitating blood loss\]) for each visit. LOCF method was used to impute any missing data. The mean of the WHO bleeding scale across visits during the 24-week treatment period was summarized by treatment group using descriptive statistics. A 2-sided, 2-sample t-test was used to test for a difference in means between treatments for this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fostamatinib RecipientFrequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale0.26 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Placebo RecipientFrequency and Severity of Bleeding According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale0.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
p-value: 0.249995% CI: [-0.32, 0.09]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 12

Among subjects with a baseline platelet count \< 15,000/μL, achievement of a count ≥ 30,000/μL and at least 20,000/μL above baseline at Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fostamatinib RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 126 Participants
Placebo RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 121 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 24

Among subjects with a baseline platelet count \< 15,000/μL, achievement of a count ≥ 30,000/μL and at least 20,000/μL above baseline at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fostamatinib RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 243 Participants
Placebo RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 30,000/μL and at Least 20,000/μL Above Baseline at Week 240 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 12

Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fostamatinib RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 1212 Participants
Placebo RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 123 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 24

Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fostamatinib RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 248 Participants
Placebo RecipientNumber of Participants With Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/µL at Week 241 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026