Skip to content

Comparison of Dynamic Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes in Anatomical ACL Reconstruction at AM or Central Position

Comparison of Dynamic Knee Stability and Functional Outcomes in Anatomical Single-bundle ACL at Anteromedial or Central Tunnel Position - Prospective, Randomized and Double-blind Clinical Trial in Athletes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02074917
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-02-28
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2014-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament, ACL, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, outcome assessment, outcome assessment, patient, treatment outcome, exercise test, anatomic, anatomical, single-bundle, force platform, postural balance, biomechanics, CT scan, X-ray computed tomography, tomography, diagnostic imaging, knee, knee injuries, joint instability, reconstructive surgical procedures, knee surgery, arthroscopy, athletes, sports medicine, humans, prospective studies, Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized and double-blind clinical trial about anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. One of the most common causes of ACL reconstruction failure is poor graft positioning. There is evidence that graft placement aligned with native insertion sites results in superior clinical outcomes. Current anatomic ACL reconstruction concepts highlight the importance of the native anatomy to restore physiological knee kinematics more accurately. This study aims to investigate clinical outcomes and dynamic knee stability with force platform and other functional tests after ACL reconstruction in two different groups of tunnel position: anteromedial ACL footprint (AM) or central ACL footprint. It was hypothesized that there would be clinical or dynamic stability differences between AM or Central tunnel groups in ACL reconstruction.

Detailed description

Tunnel position will be recorded and confirmed with postoperative computer tomography.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAnatomical ACL reconstruction

Anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the anteromedial or central tunnels positions.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Physical activity classified by Tegner scale ≥ 5 * Absence of other associated ligament injuries in the operated knee * No ACL rerupture or previous ACL reconstruction in the same or other knee * Absence of untreated lesions of the opposite knee * No obvious change in the alignment of the mechanical axis that required surgical correction * Athletes of both gender with a minimum age of 18 years and maximum of 45 years * Signature of the consent term (IRB) * Not be pregnant.

Exclusion criteria

* Request to stop the study by patient at any time * Fracture not associated with the surgical procedure * Do not carry out the rehabilitation protocol as oriented by the Sports Medicine group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic Stability with force platform12 monthsEvaluation of dynamic stability in stand position and leg movements with force platform

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline and between groups in Tegner activity score6, 12, 24 monthsThis is a validated score for level of activity related to knee stability. It provides a standardized method of grading work and sporting activities from 0 to 10.
Single leg hop test for distance - side to side difference6, 12 monthsThis test includes a single leg hop for distance comparison between involved leg vs. contra-lateral normal leg. Results are expressed as a percentage of the non-involved leg.
Change from baseline and between groups in Lysholm knee scoring scale6, 12, 24 monthsThis is a validated scoring scale to evaluate outcomes of knee ligament surgery, particularly symptoms of instability. The total score is the sum of each response to the 8 items, of a possible score of 100.
Change from baseline and between groups in Dynamic Stability with force platform6 monthsEvaluation of dynamic stability in stand position and leg movements with force platform. Antero-posterior and latero-medial movements are measured in metric scale. Area and velocity of movement are also calculated.
Change from baseline and between groups in International Knee Documentation Committee form (IKDC)6, 12 e 24 monthsThe form is used to detect improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities due to knee impairment. It is a validated 18-item patient measurement tool. that can be used for post-operatory ACL reconstruction
Isokinetic knee strength test - side to side difference6, 12 monthsQuadriceps and hamstring isokinetic strength are assessed at velocities of 60 and 240 degrees per second and values are compared between involved operated leg and non-involved leg and between groups. Peak torque and flexion/extension rate are analyzed.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactArnaldo J Hernandez, PhD, MSc, MD
ajhernandez@uol.com.br+551126616041
Backup ContactDanilo RO Oliveira, Phisycian
ortopedistadanilo@hotmail.com+5511983697729

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026