Skip to content

IntellO2 vs Manual Control for Optimizing Oxygenation in Infants

Comparison of the IntellO2 - Precision Flow Automatic FiO2 Controller to Manual Control for Optimizing Oxygenation in Preterm Infants Receiving High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02074774
Enrollment
36
Registered
2014-02-28
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2018-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oxygen Titration in Preterm Infants to Manage Lung Disease

Keywords

nasal cannula, high flow oxygen therapy, pulse oximetry

Brief summary

The overall objective of this study is to demonstrate that the IntellO2 device providing automated control of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) adjustments in spontaneously breathing infants with fluctuating arterial blood oxygen saturation levels is safe and efficacious in the routine clinical environment. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the IntellO2 will perform as well or better than standard practice for maintaining infants' arterial blood oxygen saturation in a target range while minimizing the exposure to elevated levels of oxygen in the inspired gas.

Interventions

DEVICEIntellO2

Automated FiO2 regulator that responds to pulse oximetry measures

Standard practice of manually titrating FiO2 as needed.

Sponsors

Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Vapotherm, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Preterm infants being treated with high flow nasal cannula therapy 2. A need for supplemental oxygen as demonstrated by an required FiO2 \> 0.25 at enrollment 3. Requiring a flow rate of greater than 2 L/min such that the assumed inspired oxygen fraction matched delivered oxygen fraction (definition of HFNC).

Exclusion criteria

1. Major congenital abnormalities 2. Hemodynamic instability, defined as being outside of a normotensive range based on each infant's individual characteristics 3. Seizures 4. Ongoing sepsis 5. Meningitis 6. Clinician's concern regarding stability of the infant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent time in target range for oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry24 hrs

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026