Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of 2 Different Concentrations of CD1579 Gels Versus Vehicle in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Vehicle-controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of 2 Different Concentrations of CD1579 Gels Versus Vehicle in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02073461
Enrollment
236
Registered
2014-02-27
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Keywords

Acne Vulgaris

Brief summary

This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of two concentrations of CD1579 (2.5% and 5%) versus vehicle in the treatment of acne vulgaris in the Japanese patients.

Interventions

DRUGCD1579 2.5%
DRUGCD1579 5%
DRUGVehicle

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women at the age of 12 or older at the Screening visit. * Those with clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with more than 20 noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) and 12 to 100 (inclusive) inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules and nodules) on the face (forehead, both cheeks, nose and chin).

Exclusion criteria

* Those with more than two nodular acne lesions or any cysts. * Those with the diagnosis of any acne conglobata, any acne fulminans, any chloracne, or any drug induced acne. * Those who have clinically significant abnormal findings or conditions on skin other than acne such as atopic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, or rosacea that potentially interfere with study assessments according to Investigator's judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline - Week 12Median percent reductions from Baseline in total lesion count (ITT-LOCF)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Tolerability (Erythema)12 weeksHighest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline
Local Tolerability (Scaling)12 weeksHighest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline
Percent of Subjects With Adverse Eventsup to 12 weeksAdverse events which were observed in 5% or more patients with either group are listed.
Local Tolerability (Pruritus)12 weeksHighest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline
Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)12 weeksHighest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline
Local Tolerability (Dryness)12 weeksHighest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CD1579 2.5%
Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% CD1579 2.5%
79
CD1579 5%
Benzoyl Peroxide 5% CD1579 5%
78
Vehicle
Vehicle Vehicle
79
Total236

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCD1579 2.5%CD1579 5%VehicleTotal
Age, Continuous22.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
21.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
21.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
21.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Region of Enrollment
Japan
79 participants78 participants79 participants236 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants51 Participants45 Participants153 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants27 Participants34 Participants83 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 7931 / 7826 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 790 / 781 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts

Median percent reductions from Baseline in total lesion count (ITT-LOCF)

Time frame: Baseline - Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CD1579 2.5%Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts58.3 percent change
CD1579 5%Percent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts65.9 percent change
VehiclePercent Changes From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts25.5 percent change
Secondary

Local Tolerability (Dryness)

Highest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Dryness)Mild20 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Dryness)Moderate2 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Dryness)Mild33 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Dryness)Moderate6 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Dryness)Mild10 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Dryness)Moderate0 participants
Secondary

Local Tolerability (Erythema)

Highest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Moderate3 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Mild12 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Severe0 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Moderate3 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Mild18 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Erythema)Severe1 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Erythema)Mild5 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Erythema)Severe0 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Erythema)Moderate0 participants
Secondary

Local Tolerability (Pruritus)

Highest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Moderate6 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Mild20 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Severe1 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Moderate7 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Mild13 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Pruritus)Severe2 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Pruritus)Mild6 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Pruritus)Severe0 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Pruritus)Moderate1 participants
Secondary

Local Tolerability (Scaling)

Highest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Scaling)Mild15 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Scaling)Moderate4 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Scaling)Mild25 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Scaling)Moderate7 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Scaling)Mild8 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Scaling)Moderate1 participants
Secondary

Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)

Highest severity of local tolerability scores worse than Baseline

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Mild19 participants
CD1579 2.5%Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Moderate6 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Mild29 participants
CD1579 5%Local Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Moderate7 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Mild4 participants
VehicleLocal Tolerability (Stinging/Burning)Moderate1 participants
Secondary

Percent of Subjects With Adverse Events

Adverse events which were observed in 5% or more patients with either group are listed.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CD1579 2.5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse Events% of subjects with AEs43.0 percentage of participants
CD1579 2.5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsNasopharyngitis12.7 percentage of participants
CD1579 2.5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsHeadache10.1 percentage of participants
CD1579 2.5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsDysmenorrhea6.3 percentage of participants
CD1579 5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsDysmenorrhea3.8 percentage of participants
CD1579 5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse Events% of subjects with AEs39.7 percentage of participants
CD1579 5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsHeadache1.3 percentage of participants
CD1579 5%Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsNasopharyngitis14.1 percentage of participants
VehiclePercent of Subjects With Adverse EventsDysmenorrhea3.8 percentage of participants
VehiclePercent of Subjects With Adverse EventsNasopharyngitis13.9 percentage of participants
VehiclePercent of Subjects With Adverse EventsHeadache8.9 percentage of participants
VehiclePercent of Subjects With Adverse Events% of subjects with AEs32.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026