Skip to content

HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Trial

HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty During Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02071849
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-02-26
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Insufficiency

Keywords

Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation

Brief summary

The HAART 200 Aortic Annuloplasty during Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART 200 bicuspid annuloplasty ring when used to surgically stabilize the aortic valve annulus in patients undergoing repair of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) for predominant aortic insufficiency (AI).

Detailed description

Aortic valve disease is the most common valvular heart disease with approximately 200,000 patients per year undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement in North America and Europe. Around 60% of valves have Aortic Stenosis (AS) and 40% of have Aortic Insufficiency, which is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole, causing blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Bicuspid valve morphology is present in a fourth to a third of patients coming to surgical intervention, and constitutes a very important subset. Several conditions are associated with bicuspid disease, including ascending aortic or root aneurysms in up to a third. Traditional management of aortic valve and root disease has been with aortic valve replacement, with or without root replacement (Bentall Procedure). However, as has been observed in patients with mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining one's reconstructed native valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have multiple benefits. The advantages of repair include: the avoidance of prosthetic valve related complications and structural degeneration with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years and elimination of the need for anticoagulation and related problems with mechanical valves in younger patients. The significantly lower rate of endocarditis after repair is a major impetus to increasing performance of BAV reconstruction. Thus, aortic valve repair currently is established as an excellent option for patients with BAV. However, with connective tissue disorders being an inherent feature of BAV, outcomes have been less stable long-term than for trileaflet repair, primarily because of late annular redilatation in BAV disease. Therefore, this study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of annular stabilization with a bicuspid annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing repair of a bicuspid aortic valve for predominant aortic insufficiency.

Interventions

DEVICEHAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device

Surgical repair of bicuspid aortic valve using the HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device .

Sponsors

Biostable Science & Engineering
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is 18 years of age or older 2. The subject has bi-leaflet aortic valve morphology 3. The subject has documented aortic valve disease which may or may not include: * Aortic valve insufficiency * Ascending aortic or aortic root pathology * Other pathology of the ascending aorta that requires elective aortic replacement * Associated stable one or two vessel coronary disease requiring concomitant coronary bypass * Patients with recurrent severe AI (Grade 3 or 4) after prior bicuspid repair who are undergoing re-repair because of annular re-dilatation * All bicuspid annular and leaflet configurations will be included 4. The subject needs: * correction of BAV annular dilatation in patients with chronic AI and dilated annulus * restoration of a circular annular shape in patients with bicuspid valve and expansion of sinus to sinus dimensions * stabilization of annular geometry long-term in rare bicuspid valve patients with severe AI and minimal annular dilatation 5. The is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve 6. The subject has reviewed and signed the written informed consent form 7. The subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable)

Exclusion criteria

1. All patients will be excluded who require emergency surgery for any reason. 2. All the patients who have had a prior heart valve replacement 3. The subject's aortic valve morphology is not bicuspid. 4. The subject has active endocarditis 5. The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis 6. Heavily calcified BAV valves, calcified aortic roots, or porcelain aortas 7. Leukopenia with a White Blood Cell (WBC) of less than 3000 8. Acute anemia with a Hgb less than 9mg% 9. Platelet count less than 100,000 cells/mm3 10. History of a defined bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions 11. Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 2-4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics) 12. Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated 13. Low Ejection Fraction (EF) \< 35% 14. Life expectancy \< 1 year, or severe comorbidities, such as dialysis or severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 15. The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product or has participated in such a study within the 30 days prior to screening 16. The subject is a minor, an illicit drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent 17. The subject is pregnant or lactating 18. Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) 19. Myocardial Infarction (MI) within one month of trial inclusion 20. The subject has a known intolerance to titanium or polyester 21. The subject has documented unstable or \> 2 vessel coronary disease 22. The subject requires additional valve replacement or valve repair

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure.6 months postprocedure
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months6 months postprocedureAortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderately Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure.2 years
Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 YearsBaseline and 2 yearsAortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification6 months postprocedureFour classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
NYHA Functional Capacity Classification2 years postprocedureFour classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Peak Gradient - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsTransthoracic echocardiography parameter
Mean Gradient - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsTransthoracic echocardiography parameter
Left Ventricular (LV) Mass - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LV Mass - Change From BaselineBaseline and 2 yearsLeft ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Implant Procedure Successdischarge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes firstSuccess is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge following the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
LVID Diastole - Change From BaselineBaseline and 2 yearsLeft ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LVID Systole - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LV Systolic Volume - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Cardiac Output - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsStroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Cardiac Index - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsHemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Left Ventricular Internal Dimension (LVID) Diastole - Change From BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsLeft ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events6 months postprocedureFreedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aortic Valve Repair
Implantation of HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device for bicuspid aortic valve reconstruction HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device: Surgical repair of bicuspid aortic valve using the HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device .
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
2-year Extended Follow-upAdverse Event1
6-month Primary EndpointAdverse Event1
6-month Primary EndpointDid not receive device4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAortic Valve Repair
Age, Continuous44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Age, Customized
18-29
3 Participants
Age, Customized
30-39
2 Participants
Age, Customized
40-49
6 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59
4 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69
1 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
0
1 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
1+
3 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
2+
2 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
3+
5 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
4+
3 Participants
Aortic Insufficiency
Grade not available
2 Participants
Cardiac index3.88 l/min/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.16
Cardiac output7.926 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.365
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)53.86 percentage of blood volume
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.76
Left ventricular internal dimension (LVID) diastole5.408 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.952
Left ventricular (LV) mass288.62 g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 90.23
LV diastolic volume144.5 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.6
LVID systole3.527 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.793
LV systolic volume69.1 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.6
Mean gradient13.4 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
I
3 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
II
13 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
III
0 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity
IV
0 Participants
Peak gradient25.5 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
Region of Enrollment
Germany
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months

Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderately Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months05 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months1+6 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months2+4 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months3+0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months4+0 Participants
Primary

Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure.

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aortic Valve RepairPrimary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure.100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aortic Valve RepairActuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events87.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aortic Valve RepairActuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events81.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years

Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aortic Valve RepairAortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years02 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairAortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years1+11 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairAortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years2+1 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairAortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years3+0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairAortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years4+0 Participants
Secondary

Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairCardiac Index - Change From Baseline-1.09 l/min/m^2Standard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairCardiac Index - Change From Baseline-0.50 l/min/m^2Standard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairCardiac Output - Change From Baseline-0.932 l/minStandard Deviation 2.979
Secondary

Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairCardiac Output - Change From Baseline-2.145 l/minStandard Deviation 2.679
Secondary

Implant Procedure Success

Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge following the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aortic Valve RepairImplant Procedure Success100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline4.21 percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 10.02
Secondary

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline0.00 percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 8.83
Secondary

Left Ventricular Internal Dimension (LVID) Diastole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLeft Ventricular Internal Dimension (LVID) Diastole - Change From Baseline-0.306 cmStandard Deviation 0.843
Secondary

Left Ventricular (LV) Mass - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLeft Ventricular (LV) Mass - Change From Baseline-53.98 gStandard Deviation 76.21
Secondary

LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline26.9 mlStandard Deviation 40.9
Secondary

LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline2.8 mlStandard Deviation 41.3
Secondary

LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLVID Diastole - Change From Baseline-0.455 cmStandard Deviation 1.023
Secondary

LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLVID Systole - Change From Baseline0.030 cmStandard Error 0.531
Secondary

LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLVID Systole - Change From Baseline-0.700 cmStandard Deviation 1.108
Secondary

LV Mass - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLV Mass - Change From Baseline-78.84 gStandard Deviation 88
Secondary

LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline1.3 mlStandard Deviation 25.8
Secondary

LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairLV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline7.9 mlStandard Deviation 24.9
Secondary

Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairMean Gradient - Change From Baseline1.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 13.3
Secondary

Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairMean Gradient - Change From Baseline2.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

Population: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aortic Valve RepairNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationI15 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationII0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIII0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIV0 Participants
Secondary

NYHA Functional Capacity Classification

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

Population: Participants with an evaluation of this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Aortic Valve RepairNYHA Functional Capacity ClassificationIII0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNYHA Functional Capacity ClassificationIV0 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNYHA Functional Capacity ClassificationI14 Participants
Aortic Valve RepairNYHA Functional Capacity ClassificationII0 Participants
Secondary

Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 2 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairPeak Gradient - Change From Baseline1.4 mm HgStandard Deviation 16.3
Secondary

Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with an echocardiogram evaluable for this measure at baseline and at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Aortic Valve RepairPeak Gradient - Change From Baseline1.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 22.4
Secondary

Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Aortic Valve RepairSurvival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure.100 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026