Skip to content

Safety and Performance Study of the Shockwave Lithoplasty System

Safety and Performance Study of the Shockwave Lithoplasty System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02071108
Acronym
DISRUPT-PAD
Enrollment
35
Registered
2014-02-25
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2017-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Brief summary

To study the safety and performance of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System in subjects to demonstrate that the Shockwave device can safely and effectively deliver localized shockwave energy for balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic, infrainguinal peripheral arteries.

Detailed description

Shockwave Medical, Inc. intends to conduct a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, clinical study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the Shockwave Lithoplasty System in subjects with moderate to heavily calcified peripheral arteries with 3.50mm to 7.0mm reference vessel diameter at the target site. The Shockwave Lithoplasty System is indicated to generate sonic shockwave energy within the target treatment site and disrupt calcium within the lesion to allow for subsequent dilation of a peripheral artery stenosis using low balloon pressure. Up to thirty-five (35) subjects will be enrolled and treated with Lithoplasty to yield thirty (30) evaluable subjects complete the study assuming a 15% lost to follow-up rate.

Interventions

Sponsors

Shockwave Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is able and willing to comply with all assessments in the study. 2. Subject or subject's legal representative have been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed the approved consent form. 3. Age of subject is \>18. 4. Rutherford Clinical Category 2, 3, or 4. 5. Resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) of ≤0.90, or ≤0.75 after exercise, of the target leg. 6. Moderate to severe calcification of target lesion(s) per pre-procedure CT scan. (Calcification must be: 1) ≥180 degrees circumferential at some point in the lesion and 2) extend ≥50 percent length of lesion or absolute length ≥20mm.) 7. Estimated life expectancy \>1 year.

Exclusion criteria

1. Rutherford Clinical Category 5 and 6. 2. Subject has active infection in the target leg. 3. Planned major amputation of the target leg (transmetatarsal or higher). 4. In-stent restenosis within the target lesion(s). 5. Highly tortuous arteries (bends greater than 30 degrees over the arc length of the balloon). 6. Chronic total occlusion of the target lesion(s). 7. Target lesion(s) within native or synthetic vessel grafts. 8. Chronic total occlusion of inflow vessel. 9. Lesion in contralateral limb requiring intervention within the next 30 days. 10. History of prior endovascular or surgical procedure on the index limb within the past 30 days. 11. Subject has significant stenosis (\>50% stenosis) or occlusion of inflow tract (upstream disease) not successfully treated with plain old balloon angioplasty or stent and without complications before target lesion(s) treatment. 12. Subject requires treatment of a peripheral lesion on the ipsilateral limb distal to the target lesion(s) at the time of the enrollment / index procedure. 13. Subject has a known coagulopathy or has a bleeding diatheses, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 100,000/microliter, or international normalized ratio \>1.5. 14. Subject in whom antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated. 15. Subject has known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated. 16. Subject has known allergy to urethane, nylon, or silicone. 17. Myocardial infarction within 60 days prior to enrollment. 18. History of stroke within 60 days prior to enrollment. 19. History of unstable coronary artery disease or other uncontrollable comorbidity resulting in hospitalization within the last 60 days prior to enrollment. 20. History of thrombolytic therapy within two weeks of enrollment. 21. Subject has acute or chronic renal disease (e.g., as measured by a serum creatinine of \>2.5 mg/dL or \>220 umol/L), or on dialysis. 22. Subject is pregnant or nursing. 23. Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint. 24. Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural Success:Day of ProcedureThe ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (with or without adjunctive Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty therapy) as assessed by quantitative angiography via core lab evaluation.
Composite of New-onset Major Adverse Events (MAE)30 daysNeed for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb. Unplanned target limb amputation (above the ankle). Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli, defined as clinical signs or symptoms of thrombus or distal emboli detected in the treated limb in the area of the treated lesion, or distal to the treated lesion, after the index procedure or noted angiographically, and requiring mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow. Perforations and dissections of grade D or greater that require an intervention to resolve, including bail-out stenting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success:Day of ProcedureThe ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (with or without adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty therapy) as assessed by the investigator via visual estimate and freedom from procedural major adverse events.
Technical Success:Day of ProcedureThe ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to delivery ShockWave treatment to the desired location in the target vessel. Up to two Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty Systems maybe used to complete treatment in the target vessel.
Freedom From Major Adverse Events30 daysFreedom from Major Adverse Events at 30 days.
Patency30 daysVessel patency at 30 days by Doppler Ultrasound defined as freedom from greater than 50% restenosis (as assessed by Duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of ≥2.5).
Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)Baseline and 30 daysChange in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) of the target limb at 30 days. The Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the systolic pressure at the ankle, divided by the systolic pressure at the arm.
Rutherford Clinical CategoryBaseline and 30 daysChange in Rutherford Clinical Category (RCC) at 30 days. RCC identifies three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. Grade I includes Category 0 - Asymptomatic, Category 1 - Mild claudication, Category 2 - Moderate claudication, and Category 3 - Severe claudication. Grade II includes Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain and Category 5 - Minor tissue loss. Grade III includes Category 6 - Ulceration or grangrene. Change of at least 2 categories considered statistically significant.
Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)30 daysFreedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 30 days
Device SuccessDay of ProcedureThe ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (without adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty therapy) as assessed via quantitative angiography via core lab evaluation.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exploratory EndpointDay of ProcedureThe clinical protocol provided for an Exploratory Secondary Endpoint to assess the ability of the device to achieve ≤30% residual stenosis without adjunctive PTA as assessed by the investigator via visual estimate.

Countries

Austria, Germany, New Zealand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three investigational sites in Austria and New Zealand participated in the study. Between January 2014 and September 2014, a total of 35 subjects and 39 lesions of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries were enrolled in the Full Analysis Cohort of the study and treated with the investigational device.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lithoplasty Treatment
Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System
35
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLithoplasty Treatment
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
28 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Composite of New-onset Major Adverse Events (MAE)

Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb. Unplanned target limb amputation (above the ankle). Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli, defined as clinical signs or symptoms of thrombus or distal emboli detected in the treated limb in the area of the treated lesion, or distal to the treated lesion, after the index procedure or noted angiographically, and requiring mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow. Perforations and dissections of grade D or greater that require an intervention to resolve, including bail-out stenting.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentComposite of New-onset Major Adverse Events (MAE)0 participants
Primary

Procedural Success:

The ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (with or without adjunctive Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty therapy) as assessed by quantitative angiography via core lab evaluation.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentProcedural Success:100 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)

Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) of the target limb at 30 days. The Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the systolic pressure at the ankle, divided by the systolic pressure at the arm.

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed. Four subjects were not included in the analysis because ABI could not be measured due to non-compressible disease that inhibited accurate ABI measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lithoplasty TreatmentAnkle Brachial Index (ABI)0.3 change in ABI score from baseline
Secondary

Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)

Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) of the target limb at 6 months. The Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is the systolic pressure at the ankle, divided by the systolic pressure at the arm.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lithoplasty TreatmentAnkle Brachial Index (ABI)1.0 Ankle Brachial Index
Secondary

Clinical Success:

The ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (with or without adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty therapy) as assessed by the investigator via visual estimate and freedom from procedural major adverse events.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentClinical Success:100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Device Success

The ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to achieve a post-Shockwave residual diameter stenosis of \<50% (without adjunctive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty therapy) as assessed via quantitative angiography via core lab evaluation.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentDevice Success87.2 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Freedom From Major Adverse Events

Freedom from Major Adverse Events at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentFreedom From Major Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Freedom From Major Adverse Events

Freedom from Major Adverse Events at 30 days.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentFreedom From Major Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 6 months

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentFreedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)100 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 30 days

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentFreedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)100 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Patency

Vessel patency at 6 months at Doppler Ultrasound defined as freedom from greater than 50% restenosis (as assessed by Duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of =2.5).

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentPatency82.1 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Patency

Vessel patency at 30 days by Doppler Ultrasound defined as freedom from greater than 50% restenosis (as assessed by Duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of ≥2.5).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted. Due to device malfunctions, one subject received partial treatment. To provide a more accurate account of actual device usage, the subject was omitted from the analysis of device usage only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentPatency100 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Rutherford Clinical Category

Change in Rutherford Clinical Category (RCC) at 30 days. RCC identifies three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. Grade I includes Category 0 - Asymptomatic, Category 1 - Mild claudication, Category 2 - Moderate claudication, and Category 3 - Severe claudication. Grade II includes Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain and Category 5 - Minor tissue loss. Grade III includes Category 6 - Ulceration or grangrene. Change of at least 2 categories considered statistically significant.

Time frame: Baseline and 30 days

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lithoplasty TreatmentRutherford Clinical Category-2.5 change in RCC from baseline
Secondary

Rutherford Clinical Category

Change in Rutherford Clinical Category (RCC) at 6 months. RCC identifies three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. Grade I includes Category 0 - Asymptomatic, Category 1 - Mild claudication, Category 2 - Moderate claudication, and Category 3 - Severe claudication. Grade II includes Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain and Category 5 - Minor tissue loss. Grade III includes Category 6 - Ulceration or grangrene. Change of at least 2 categories considered statistically significant.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lithoplasty TreatmentRutherford Clinical Category0.4 Rutherford Clinical Category
Secondary

Technical Success:

The ability of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System to delivery ShockWave treatment to the desired location in the target vessel. Up to two Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty Systems maybe used to complete treatment in the target vessel.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Full Analysis Cohort - All subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was attempted

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentTechnical Success:97.4 percentage of lesions
Other Pre-specified

Exploratory Endpoint

The clinical protocol provided for an Exploratory Secondary Endpoint to assess the ability of the device to achieve ≤30% residual stenosis without adjunctive PTA as assessed by the investigator via visual estimate.

Time frame: Day of Procedure

Population: Per-Protocol Cohort - the group of subjects who were enrolled in the study and where delivery of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty treatment was successfully completed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lithoplasty TreatmentExploratory Endpoint87 percentage of lesions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026