Skip to content

BOTOX® (Onabotulinumtoxin A) Injection(s) as a Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

BOTOX® (Onabotulinumtoxin A) Injection(s) as a Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02070302
Enrollment
10
Registered
2014-02-25
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Brief summary

This study will be a prospective double blind controlled randomized trial of ten patients diagnosed with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The study will be completed at offices of medical practices in Arizona. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be randomly distributed into two groups: a BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) injection group and a Normal Saline Injection (NS) (Placebo group). Each group will consist of five randomly assigned individuals.

Detailed description

This is a pilot study, to assist with determining appropriate BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) dosing and injection locations in patients suffering from CTS. Outcome measures will be obtained at follow-up at 6, 12, and 18 weeks post BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) injection and post saline injection using the same scales and instruments at baseline, namely Levine scale, JAMAR pinch dynamometer, EDX/NCS and NMUS. These measurements will be used to identify the effectiveness of BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) in decreasing thenar muscle strength, appropriate BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) injection dosing, and ability to decrease the inflammation, median nerve dysfunction, edema, symptoms of pain, numbness, and tingling often with associated with CTS.

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum Toxin Type A

40 units of BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) divided into two injection sites of 20 units each

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (Normal Saline) divided into 2 injections of .4cc each

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Benjamin Sucher
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient history: evaluated using the Levine Scale for CTS, a self-administered questionnaire which assesses the function and severity of CTS. * Physical Exam: including use of JAMAR pinch dynamometer to quantify initial baseline strength and confirm decreased pinch strength post injection to verify effective BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) injection. * Electrodiagnostics (EDX): The following criteria would establish CTS through EDX namely baseline electromyogram (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS): a) median nerve distal motor latency (DML) \>4.3ms or \>0.9ms above the ulnar nerve DML b) median distal sensory latency (DSL) to D-1 \>2.9ms or \>0.4ms above radial nerve D-1 DSL. c) median D-2 DSL \>3.7ms or \>0.4ms above ulnar nerve D-5 DSL (5). d) median mixed nerve palm-to-wrist latency (at 8cm) \>2.2ms or \>.3ms above ulnar mixed nerve palm-to-wrist latency (at 8cm). * Imaging & Measurements (NMUS): Carpal tunnel images will be obtained in a transverse plane in both a neutral relaxed position at the level of the pisiform and longitudinally during neutral and Dynamic Stress Testing (DST) by a A Sonosite M-Turbo 6-13 MHz ultrasound system or another similar system (+ 2% accuracy). Measurements: Transverse images of the CT will measure the median nerve cross sectional area (CSA) at the level of the pisiform bone. CSA measurements greater than 11 mm2 are indicative of CTS. Borderline CSA measurements would require wrist forearm ratio (WFR) measurements to be a WFR \> 1.5. Patients will need to have a CSA \>11mm2, (or WFR \>1.5) and show median nerve compression during DST of at least 30% to be included.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with prior carpal tunnel surgery, prior history of BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) injection * Steroid injection two months prior or three months after BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxin A) CTS injection, median nerve denervation on needle EMG * Major limb trauma or surgery, dysphagia * Neuromuscular junction disorder (ie: Myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome) * Currently pregnant or breast feeding * Patients with severe CTS identified by Levine scale \>4, electrodiagnostics, and/or unable to meet the inclusion criteria as identified above would be excluded as participants in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Baseline-Week 18Patients with Levine score \< 4 were included in the study. The score for this assessment can range from 11-55.
Change From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Baseline-Week 18Patients with Levine score of \< 4 were included in the study. The score for this assessment can range from 8-40
Change From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Baseline to Week 18Neuromuscular ultrasound measures nerve compression (swelling) by cross sectional area of median nerve, in format % change from baseline.
Change From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 18.Latency is the interval between the stimulation of a muscle and the observed response, measuring conduction speed in milliseconds compared to baseline
Change From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Baseline to Week 18Latency is the interval between the stimulation of a muscle and the observed response measuring nerve conduction speed in milliseconds.
Change From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Baseline-Week 18Mean value of one finger and two finger opposition pinch between 1st and 5th and 1st with 4th and 5th phalanges.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Botulinum Toxin Type A (Onabot)
A prospective, randomized, double blind pilot study of patients with bilateral mild to moderate CTS, diagnosed by nerve conduction studies (NCS) and NMUS (with crosssectional area measurements; and percentage of nerve compression measured during mechanical stress testing). For 5 out of 10 subjects, non-dominant hands were injected under ultrasound guidance with 40 units of Onabot (0.4cc) divided equally into the abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis muscles. Participants were evaluated with NMUS, NCS, Levine Scale (symptom severity and functional status), and Jamar dynamometer at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 weeks.
5
Placebo
A prospective, randomized, double blind pilot study of 10 patients with bilateral mild to moderate CTS, diagnosed by nerve conduction studies (NCS) and NMUS (with crosssectional area measurements; and percentage of nerve compression measured during mechanical stress testing). Non-dominant hands were injected under ultrasound guidance with 40 units of 40 units of normal saline (0.4cc) divided equally into the abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis muscles. Participants were evaluated with NMUS, NCS, Levine Scale (symptom severity and functional status), and Jamar dynamometer at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 weeks.
5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBotulinum Toxin Type A (Onabot)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Age, Continuous52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
56.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 50 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.

Latency is the interval between the stimulation of a muscle and the observed response, measuring conduction speed in milliseconds compared to baseline

Time frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 18.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.4
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 12-0.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.3
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-0.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 120.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Distal Sensory Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Change From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.

Latency is the interval between the stimulation of a muscle and the observed response measuring nerve conduction speed in milliseconds.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 18

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-0.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.3
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 12-0.4 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.5
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-0.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 12-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline Electrodiagnostics Motor Median Nerve Latency at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Change From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.

Neuromuscular ultrasound measures nerve compression (swelling) by cross sectional area of median nerve, in format % change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 18

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-13.0 % changeStandard Deviation 15.3
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 12-15.9 % changeStandard Deviation 19.5
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-12.2 % changeStandard Deviation 17.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 2-Week 6-20.2 % changeStandard Deviation 18.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 3-Week 12-13.3 % changeStandard Deviation 9.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Median Nerve Compression on Neuromuscular Ultrasound at Week 6, Week 12, and Week 18.Visit 4-Week 18-4.7 % changeStandard Deviation 14
Primary

Change From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.

Mean value of one finger and two finger opposition pinch between 1st and 5th and 1st with 4th and 5th phalanges.

Time frame: Baseline-Week 18

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 121.4 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 0.5
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 61.1 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 1.2
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 181.4 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 12-0.1 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 60.5 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline Jamar Pinch (Unrelated Dominant Hand - Mean Value of All Repetitions/Positions) at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 180.4 Pounds of Force (LBF)Standard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Change From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.

Patients with Levine score of \< 4 were included in the study. The score for this assessment can range from 8-40

Time frame: Baseline-Week 18

Population: Levine functional severity scale is a measure of mean of median value calculated for both Onabot and Placebo groups based on patient answered questions. This scale ranges from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe symptoms). The function severity scale indicate interference of the symptoms on activities of daily living. Mean values reported for each group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 6-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 12-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 18-4.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 6-4.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 12-9.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Function Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 18-12.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Primary

Change From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.

Patients with Levine score \< 4 were included in the study. The score for this assessment can range from 11-55.

Time frame: Baseline-Week 18

Population: Levine symptom severity scale is a measure of mean of median value calculated for both Onabot and Placebo groups based on patient answered questions. It ranges from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe symptoms). This scale indicate how severe the CTS symptoms feel to the patient. Mean values (std deviation) are reported both Onabot and Placebo groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 60.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 12-4.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Botulinum Toxin Type AChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 18-5.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 2-Week 6-3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 3-Week 12-9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline Levine Symptom Severity Scale Status at Weeks 6, 12,18.Visit 4-Week 18-6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026