Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02069444

Enrollment

100

Registered

2014-02-24

Start date

2012-01-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2014-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery

Brief summary

For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMacintosh laryngoscope

intubation criterias withMacintosh laryngoscopein pediatric patients

PROCEDURETruview EVO2 laryngoscope

intubation criterias with Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in pediatric patients

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

2 Years to 12 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* aged 2-12 pediatric patients

Exclusion criteria

* any allergy * difficult airway history

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
ease laryngoscopy in children	during laryngoscopy

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026