Skip to content

Nicotinic Enhancement of Cognitive Remediation Training in Schizophrenia

Nicotinic Enhancement of Cognitive Remediation Training in Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02069392
Enrollment
31
Registered
2014-02-24
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia

Keywords

schizophrenia, cognition, cognitive remediation, nicotine

Brief summary

Schizophrenia is marked by problems in attention, memory and problem solving. These deficits predict long-term functional outcome such as the ability to live independently and maintain employment, but they are not ameliorated by currently available medications. Cognitive training improves these functions to some degree, but this approach is time- and resource-intensive. The current project aims at enhancing and accelerating the benefits that people with schizophrenia derive from cognitive training by administering nicotine during some of the training sessions. This would provide the proof of principle for a type of treatment intervention to improve cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. The current project aims at determining whether the intermittent presence of nicotine during cognitive training exercises in people with schizophrenia will shorten the training period necessary to induce significant and clinically relevant improvement and enhance the improvement seen after a training period of specified length. Hypothesis 1a: Nicotine administration during training will increase the size of all measured effects of the training intervention, and will accelerate the time course of performance enhancement on the MCCB and training exercise progression parameters. Hypothesis 1b: The larger training effects in the Nicotine Group will persist beyond the end of the intervention. Hypothesis 2a: Within-session progress on the training exercises will be larger in the presence of nicotine than in the presence of placebo. Hypothesis 2b: These acute nicotine-induced performance elevations will persist beyond the presence of nicotine through subsequent non-drug training sessions, giving evidence of an acute facilitation of learning processes.

Interventions

DRUGNicotine polacrilex lozenge

Of interest are the effects of nicotine on cognitive remediation training benefits.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-60 years. * DSM diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. * Ability to give written informed consent. * Either currently smoking and not attempting to quit, or having smoked no more than 80 cigarettes, cigarillos or cigars in lifetime and not at all within the last year. * Normal or corrected to normal vision (at least 20/50). * Four weeks of stable pharmacological treatment (same psychiatric medication at same dose) and no foreseeable changes at enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence other than nicotine within the last 12 months. * Uncontrolled hypertension (resting systolic blood pressure above 150 or diastolic above 90 mm Hg). * History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina, stroke or severe arrhythmias. * ECG abnormalities. * History of neurological conditions such as stroke, seizures, dementia or organic brain syndrome. * Mental retardation. * Pregnant, verified by urine pregnancy test for females. * Breast-feeding. * Treated with benztropine currently or within the last four weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Scorebaseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-upThe MCCB is an FDA-approved assessment tool for trials of cognition-enhancing treatments in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is comprised of the following domains: 1) Speed of Processing; 2) Attention/Vigilance; 3) Working Memory; 4) Verbal Learning; 5) Visual Learning; 6) Reasoning and Problem Solving; and 7) Social Cognition. The composite score is standardized to a T-scale (mean=50, standard deviation=10) based on healthy control normative data. Better performance is reflected by higher scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) Scorebaseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)Clinician-administered interview about daily life cognitive functioning. The CAI assesses 10 items related to working memory, attention/vigilance, learning/memory, problem solving, processing speed, and social cognition. The total score ranges from 1 (inability to maintain personal hygiene due to cognitive deficits) to 100 (superior cognitive functioning in a wide range of activities). A score of 55 corresponds to moderate cognitive symptoms, e.g. persistent problems paying attention or forgetting scheduled events.
Change in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Scorebaseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)Semi-structured clinician interview measuring functional outcome and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. Includes subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning during preceding 4 weeks. Seven items are scored on a 0 (severe impairment) to 6 (high functioning) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with larger values reflecting higher functioning.
UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) Scorebaseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)Measures ability to perform real-life tasks by standardized role-play. Scores reflect percent correct, i.e. range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better performance.
Calgary Depression Scale Scorebaseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)Clinician scale developed to assess the level of depression in schizophrenia. 9 items assess symptoms of depression and overall rater impression on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Scorebaseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)Clinician rating scale of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Within each of 5 domains, separate symptoms are rated from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). Total scores are the sum of 22 subscales and range from 0 to 110, with larger values reflecting higher negative symptoms.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Scorebaseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)Clinician rating scale to measure psychotic symptoms. Each of 20 items is scored 1-7. Total scores are the sum of all items and range from 20 to 140, with larger values reflecting worse symptoms.
Training Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweepsbaseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-upSome of the Posit Science exercises provide an assessment tool of training progress on task parameters, which adjust continuously to keep performance at \ 85% correct. Enhanced sensory processing speed and precision is considered the central building block of training benefits. Therefore, we analyzed the two exercises aimed at training these processes. Performance is quantified as stimulus presentation time in ms of visual or sound sweeps, which the participant has to judge in terms of change across space or time. Smaller values reflect better performance. Visual and sound sweeps were averaged.
Change in Working Memory Capacitybaseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 10)Derived from a computerized change localization task. One to four colored squares are shown for 100 ms. After a delay, they reappear and the task is to click on the one square that has changed color (50% chance). Performance is expressed as the percentage of correct responses.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Remediation Training With Nicotine
Participants complete daily sessions of Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants consume a 2 mg (for non-smokers) or 4 mg (for smokers) nicotine polacrilex lozenge prior to the training. Cognitive remediation training Nicotine polacrilex lozenge: Of interest are the effects of nicotine on cognitive remediation training benefits.
14
Cognitive Remediation Training Without Nicotine
Participants complete daily Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants consume a placebo lozenge prior to the training. Cognitive remediation training
17
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Remediation Training With NicotineCognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants
Age, Continuous43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants17 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants17 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Smoking status
Non-smoker
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Smoking status
Smokers
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score

The MCCB is an FDA-approved assessment tool for trials of cognition-enhancing treatments in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is comprised of the following domains: 1) Speed of Processing; 2) Attention/Vigilance; 3) Working Memory; 4) Verbal Learning; 5) Visual Learning; 6) Reasoning and Problem Solving; and 7) Social Cognition. The composite score is standardized to a T-scale (mean=50, standard deviation=10) based on healthy control normative data. Better performance is reflected by higher scores.

Time frame: baseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 432.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.98
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 10 (end of intervention)34.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.38
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 735.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score4-week follow-up35.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.67
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreBaseline32.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.42
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score4-week follow-up37.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreBaseline33.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 435.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.02
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 736.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineMATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite ScoreWeek 10 (end of intervention)36.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.27
Secondary

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Score

Clinician rating scale to measure psychotic symptoms. Each of 20 items is scored 1-7. Total scores are the sum of all items and range from 20 to 140, with larger values reflecting worse symptoms.

Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) ScoreBaseline39.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)39.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) ScoreBaseline37.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.87
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)36.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.55
Secondary

Calgary Depression Scale Score

Clinician scale developed to assess the level of depression in schizophrenia. 9 items assess symptoms of depression and overall rater impression on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineCalgary Depression Scale ScoreBaseline2.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineCalgary Depression Scale ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)2.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineCalgary Depression Scale ScoreBaseline2.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineCalgary Depression Scale ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)1.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Secondary

Change in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Score

Semi-structured clinician interview measuring functional outcome and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. Includes subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning during preceding 4 weeks. Seven items are scored on a 0 (severe impairment) to 6 (high functioning) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with larger values reflecting higher functioning.

Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineChange in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale ScoreBaseline22.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineChange in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale ScorePost-intervention (week 10)24.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.88
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineChange in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale ScoreBaseline20.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineChange in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale ScorePost-intervention (week 10)23.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.02
Secondary

Change in Working Memory Capacity

Derived from a computerized change localization task. One to four colored squares are shown for 100 ms. After a delay, they reappear and the task is to click on the one square that has changed color (50% chance). Performance is expressed as the percentage of correct responses.

Time frame: baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineChange in Working Memory CapacityBaseline67.7 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 16
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineChange in Working Memory CapacityPost-intervention (10 weeks)67.2 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 13.7
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineChange in Working Memory CapacityBaseline67.5 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 14.5
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineChange in Working Memory CapacityPost-intervention (10 weeks)68.6 percentage correct responsesStandard Deviation 13.7
Secondary

Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) Score

Clinician-administered interview about daily life cognitive functioning. The CAI assesses 10 items related to working memory, attention/vigilance, learning/memory, problem solving, processing speed, and social cognition. The total score ranges from 1 (inability to maintain personal hygiene due to cognitive deficits) to 100 (superior cognitive functioning in a wide range of activities). A score of 55 corresponds to moderate cognitive symptoms, e.g. persistent problems paying attention or forgetting scheduled events.

Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineCognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) ScoreBaseline55.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.88
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineCognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) ScorePost-intervention (week 10)69.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineCognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) ScoreBaseline59.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.59
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineCognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) ScorePost-intervention (week 10)64.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.69
Secondary

Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Score

Clinician rating scale of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Within each of 5 domains, separate symptoms are rated from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). Total scores are the sum of 22 subscales and range from 0 to 110, with larger values reflecting higher negative symptoms.

Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) ScoreBaseline36.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.64
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)33.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.14
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) ScoreBaseline37.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) ScorePost-intervention (10 weeks)36.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.04
Secondary

Training Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps

Some of the Posit Science exercises provide an assessment tool of training progress on task parameters, which adjust continuously to keep performance at \ 85% correct. Enhanced sensory processing speed and precision is considered the central building block of training benefits. Therefore, we analyzed the two exercises aimed at training these processes. Performance is quantified as stimulus presentation time in ms of visual or sound sweeps, which the participant has to judge in terms of change across space or time. Smaller values reflect better performance. Visual and sound sweeps were averaged.

Time frame: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound SweepsBaseline130.25 msStandard Deviation 46.26
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound SweepsWeek 10 (end-of-treatment)94.40 msStandard Deviation 28.04
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps4-week follow-up102.80 msStandard Deviation 39.45
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound SweepsBaseline198.80 msStandard Deviation 159.16
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound SweepsWeek 10 (end-of-treatment)124.40 msStandard Deviation 73.03
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineTraining Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps4-week follow-up117.50 msStandard Deviation 69.76
Secondary

UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) Score

Measures ability to perform real-life tasks by standardized role-play. Scores reflect percent correct, i.e. range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better performance.

Time frame: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineUCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) ScoreBaseline77.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.97
Cognitive Remediation Training With NicotineUCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) ScorePost-intervention (week 10_75.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.55
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineUCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) ScoreBaseline71.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.01
Cognitive Remediation Training Without NicotineUCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) ScorePost-intervention (week 10_74.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.28

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026