Skip to content

Comparing G6PD Tests Using Capillary Blood Versus Venous Blood

Correlation of G6PD Activity Across Different Sample Sources, and Different G6PD Testing Platforms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02069236
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-02-24
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glucose-6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

Keywords

Glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, capillary, venous, genotype phenotype correlation

Brief summary

In this study we propose to determine the correlation in glucose-6phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in capillary blood obtained from a finger stick versus a venous blood specimen. As secondary endpoints we will seek to correlate phenotype as determined by quantitative and qualitative G6PD test, genotype as determined by PCR and DNA sequencing with flow cytometry. The secondary endpoints are critical for the design of G6PD diagnostic test evaluation studies.

Detailed description

In this study we propose to determine the correlation in glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity in capillary blood obtained from a finger stick versus a venous blood specimen. We will also compare results of different G6PD tests with known G6PD genetic profiles. The results of the study will inform design of future G6PD diagnostic development & evaluations. This research will be conducted in MaeSot Thailand, where G6PD deficiency has a high prevalence. Study participants will be recruited into three groups of 50 volunteers per group: 50 G6PD-deficient individuals, 50 G6PD-normal individuals, and 50 G6PD-intermediate individuals. Following a written informed consent, participants will donate about 3 ml of venous blood and about 4 drops of capillary blood (fingerstick). There will be no direct benefit to research participants.

Interventions

OTHERG6PD Test

All subjects are tested by multiple G6PD tests

Sponsors

Mahidol University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oxford
CollaboratorOTHER
PATH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Previous G6PD test at SMRU clinic * Patient willing to participate and sign informed consent form * Patient willing to allow donated sample to be used in future research * Subjects 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* patients with severe malaria or other severe illness * Patients who received a blood transfusion in the last 3 months * Patients who received primaquine in the past 1 month (this is to ensure that previous characterization of phenotype in the healthy subject has not been influenced by a recent hemolytic reaction)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of capillary and venous blood results using Trinity quantitative G6PD testSix monthsComparison of the performance of the Trinity quantitative test using capillary blood, vs the performance of the same test using venous blood.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance between a flow cytometry-based G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standardsix monthsPercent agreement between the quantitative results of the flow cytometry assay and the quantitative results of the spectrophotometric assay.
Categorical accuracy of a flow cytometry-based G6PD test against the spectrophotometric gold standard and genotypingsix monthsUsing a predefined cutoff to categorize values from each quantitative test, determine percent agreement within each category between the two tests.
Concordance between a qualitative G6PD test and the spectrophotometric gold standardSix monthsCompare sensitivity & specificity of qualitative results of the G6PD test and the categorical results of the quantitative spectrophotometric assay.
Categorical accuracy of qualitative G6PD test against spectrophotometric gold standardsix monthsPercent agreement between the qualitative G6PD test and the categorical results of the spectrophotometric gold standard
Association between flow cytometry-based test and sample genotypeSix monthsDetermine accuracy of phenotypic results of flow cytometry assay against genetic profile.

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026