Skip to content

Detection of SLN in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic Assisted Staging: Comparison of ISB and ICG

Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients With Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Staging: Comparison of Isosulfan Blue (ISB) and Indocyanine Green Dyes (ICG) With Fluorescence Imaging

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02068820
Enrollment
200
Registered
2014-02-21
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2019-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

Sentinel lymph nodes, da Vinci, Firefly, Sentinel lymph node mapping, Fluorescence Imaging, SLN, SLN mapping

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesis is that if sensitivity and specificity are found to be significantly higher than the current reports with Technesium-99 and ISB colorimetric dye, SLN biopsies might allow omission of full lymphadenectomy in lower-risk cases, thereby limiting peri-operative morbidity. SLN biopsies might also improve the detection of metastatic disease, essentially lowering the recognized false-negative rate of standard lymphadenectomy analyzed by routine H&E pathologic analysis.

Detailed description

The study objective is to compare two sentinel lymph node detection technologies \[fluorescence imaging and Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye verses standard laparoscopic colorimetric analysis using Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye\] for sensitivity and specificity of detecting metastatic disease in pelvic lymph nodes of women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. The following three specific aims would be addressed in this research proposal: Specific Aim 1: To determine the ability of mapping bilaterally pelvic SLN in women with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic staging comparing two different methods (i.e., comparing the combination of colorimetric analysis-ISB dye + fluorescence imaging-ICG dye vs. colorimetric analysis-ISB dye alone). Specific Aim 2: To estimate the negative predictive value (NPV) of pelvic SLN in endometrial cancer with respect to predicting nodal metastasis. Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the ability of sentinel lymph nodes to increase the detection of metastatic disease through ultra-sectioning and immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining by comparing IHC results and standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) results.

Interventions

DEVICEISB dye and standard white light imaging

Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.

DEVICEICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging

Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging.

Sponsors

AdventHealth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient must be ≥18 and ≤85 years of age. 2. The patient must be female. 3. The patient must be willing and able to provide informed consent. 4. The patient is willing and able to comply with the study protocol. 5. The patient has endometrial cancer and is scheduled for robotic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. 6. The patient agrees to follow-up examinations out to 6-weeks post-treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. The patient is not a candidate for robotic assisted hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. 2. The patient has known or suspected allergies to iodine, ICG or ISB. 3. The patient has hepatic dysfunction confirmed by elevated liver function studies (i.e., hepatic enzyme SGOT, SGPT or Bilirubin \> 2 x normal (based on reference values from the laboratory used by the patient)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes.through 6 weeks post-operative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.through 6 weeks post-operativeThe standard definition for negative predictive value was used to calculate NPV. There was one false negative SLN in this study, 39 true positive sentinel lymph nodes, and 140 negative pelvic metastatic patients. NPV = 140/141=99.3%

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).through 6 weeks post-operativeOf the 127 positive nodes with pathology information, the percentage of each type of node will be summarized by the staining method. Statistical testing of the individual staining methods compared to both will be computed using Chi-square test of independence.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ISB Dye, Standard White Light
SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with Isosulfan Blue (ISB) dye and standard white light imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging.
20
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence Imaging
SLN mapping utilizing da Vinci surgical system with ISB dye and standard white light first, and then additionally, Indocyanine Green (ICG) dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging. ISB dye and standard white light imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system and ISB dye with standard white light imaging. ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging: Sentinel lymph node mapping utilizing the da Vinci surgical system with ICG dye and FireFly fluorescence imaging.
180
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingISB Dye, Standard White Light
Age64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
114 Participants101 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants79 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 Participants180 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
200 Participants180 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 2029 / 180
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 180

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes.

Time frame: through 6 weeks post-operative

Population: The ISB dye alone group (n=20) and the ICG group (n=180) are combined, because both groups received the ISB dye.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNumber of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes.1.25 nodesStandard Deviation 0.901
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNumber of Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLN) in Endometrial Cancer Patients Detected by Either ICG and/or ISB Dyes.2.03 nodesStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.

The standard definition for negative predictive value was used to calculate NPV. There was one false negative SLN in this study, 39 true positive sentinel lymph nodes, and 140 negative pelvic metastatic patients. NPV = 140/141=99.3%

Time frame: through 6 weeks post-operative

Population: Comparison of metastatic disease (yes or no) with ICG dye node detection (yes or no)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNegative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.Metastatic Disease1 Participants
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNegative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.Non Metastatic Disease140 Participants
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNegative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.Metastatic Disease39 Participants
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNegative Predictive Value (NPV) of Pelvic SLN in Endometrial Cancer in Relation to the Number of Nodes With Metastasis.Non Metastatic Disease0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).

Of the 127 positive nodes with pathology information, the percentage of each type of node will be summarized by the staining method. Statistical testing of the individual staining methods compared to both will be computed using Chi-square test of independence.

Time frame: through 6 weeks post-operative

Population: These are positive sentinel lymph nodes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Sentinel Nodes16 nodes
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Pelvic Nodes Only1 nodes
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Aortic1 nodes
ISB Dye, Standard White LightNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Infrarenal0 nodes
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Infrarenal10 nodes
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Sentinel Nodes31 nodes
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Aortic14 nodes
ICG Dye, FireFly Fluorescence ImagingNumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Pelvic Nodes Only36 nodes
Both IHC and H&ENumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Infrarenal0 nodes
Both IHC and H&ENumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Pelvic Nodes Only2 nodes
Both IHC and H&ENumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Aortic0 nodes
Both IHC and H&ENumber of Pelvic Sentinal Lymph Nodal Metastasis in Regard to Staining by Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining in Comparison to Standard Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E).Sentinel Nodes16 nodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026