Cervical Abnormalities, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3, Cervical Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Human Papillomavirus, cervical cancer, health services research, Colombia, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Brief summary
Cervical cancer as well cervical preneoplastic abnormalities (CIN2+) are cause by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. These abnormalities have been historically detected by cervical cytology, but recent evidence shows that HPV testing is superior to cytology to detect cervical lesions that eventually will progress to cancer. Despite evidence, conventional cytology (Pap) remains as a primary screening test in Colombia and HPV test is recommended as a triage test for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in settings around the world. Women with ASC-US have low risk to CIN2+ but higher than healthy population, and therefore it is important to provide appropriate clinical management. However, there is no consensus of how to deal women with ASC-US and therefore there are still three strategies for this purpose: 1) immediate colposcopy, 2) repeat conventional cytology at 6 and 12 months and 3) HPV testing. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and the efficient among the strategies as well as to evaluate the acceptability of the HPV testing in a real-life setting.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of immediate colposcopy (IC), repeat conventional cytology at 6 and 12 months (RC) and HPV triage (HPV) (QIAGEN-The digene HPV Test®) for the clinical management of women with ASC-US insured in healthcare management organizations (HMO) within the Colombian health security system. This study randomized 2,661 20-69 years old women with ASC-US, insured in HMOs in Medellin-Colombia to 3 arms: IC, RC and HPV. All women are scheduled for a visit at 2 years after recruitment that includes HPV-test/cytology and colposcopy either if HPV+ (RLU\>=1) or abnormal cytology (\>=ASC-US). This colposcopy is performed by a trained colposcopist and women are followed-up according to a well-defined algorithm. The fewer high-grade cervical neoplasia (CIN2+) rate at the end of following will determine the most effective arm. The most efficiency arm will be which reach the major effective with the minimum resource (cytologies, colposcopies and histologies) consumed. The resource consumed is being retrieved from the HMOs. This study also pretends to evaluate the acceptability of the HPV testing. This study will allow us to know if within the Colombian health security system, the HPV test will remain superior to repeating cytology and/or to immediate colposcopy as it has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials carried out in outside settings.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* ASC-US cytology, living in metropolitan area of Medellin
Exclusion criteria
* Previous abnormal cytology
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive) | Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by the community pathologists during the two years of follow-up. The first community-based CIN2+ diagnosis was adjudicated to the participant (including the exit visit if none community-based CIN2+ during the two years of follow-up). This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit visit (two years after the enrolment) | Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts after reviewing biopsies collected at the exit visit, two years after the enrolment. This outcome is an estimate of the remaining disease that was not detected by the strategies during the 2 years of follow-up. The outcome was obtained after the review of all the biopsies taken during the exit visit. Biopsies were taken using a standardized research protocol to ensure the completeness of the remaining disease. Basically, all women attending the exit visit were tested with HPV testing and Pap and referred to colposcopy if any HPV positive or abnormal cytology. The colposcopy was performed by a researcher of the study team who took up to two biopsies from the observed lesion plus one or two at random if none lesion was observed. All biopsies were reviewed by the external panel. This outcome is used for the efficiency analysis of the three strategies. |
| Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Two years since the enrolment to before the exit visit (i.e., excluding clinical records collected at the exit visit) | The outcome is defined as the number of cytologies, colposcopies, and histologies routinely performed during the two years of follow-up. Records were identified in databases or manually searched from clinical records. This outcome will be used for the analysis of the efficiency of the three strategies. |
| Self-esteem | Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit | Self-esteem corresponds to the self-assessment of a positive or negative evaluation toward oneself. This outcome was measured using the Rosenberg Scale through 10 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 1 and 4 (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, 4=strongly disagree). Total values range between 10 and 40 where lower scores suggest lower self-esteem. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result. |
| Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive) | Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts obtained after histological review of biopsies emitted by the community pathologists. Biopsies obtained during the two years of follow-up and the exit visit were reviewed by a panel of two external experts and a final result was adjudicated to each participant based on the panel of experts and the community of pathologists. This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies. |
| State Anxiety | Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit | State anxiety refers to the transitory tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety). This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result. |
| Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit | This outcome was measured using the HPV Impact Profile (HIP) scale through the following five domains: concerns about cancer and loss of fertility; emotional impact (depression and anxiety); self-image; interaction with the medical staff (pain or discomfort during the visit); and impact upon the life and its control. The response to each domain was measured on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=not at all, 1-3=a little, 4-6=somewhat, 7-9=a great deal, 10=extremely) and was then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100. A total score was calculated by adding all the items. Values \<40 indicate no or little impact, between 40 and 70 moderate impact, and \>70 indicate high psychosocial impact. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result. |
| Trait Anxiety | Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit | Trait anxiety refers to the sustainable tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety) in various situations. This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result. |
Countries
Colombia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
After a great effort, due to logistic issues, it was only possible to enroll 2661 participants instead of 3000 as it had been stated in the submitted protocol. Despite it, the trial had enough statistical power to answer the research questions.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY Women with ASC-US cytology are immediately referred to colposcopy
COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services | 882 |
| CYTOLOGY Women with ASC-US Cytology are follow-up with cytology at 6 and/or 12 months and be referred to colposcopy if any of these cytologies is ASC-US or higher
COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services
cytology: Cytology routine health services | 890 |
| HPV Test Women with ASC-US cytology are HPV tested and those HPV positive are referred to Colposcopy
HPV test: QIAGEN - The Digene HPV test®
COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services | 889 |
| Total | 2,661 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | COLPOSCOPY | CYTOLOGY | HPV Test | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 37 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 37.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 37.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 |
| Age, Customized Age, years 20-30 | 290 Participants | 305 Participants | 289 Participants | 884 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age, years 31-40 | 240 Participants | 248 Participants | 233 Participants | 721 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age, years 41-50 | 239 Participants | 225 Participants | 261 Participants | 725 Participants |
| Age, Customized Age, years 51-69 | 113 Participants | 112 Participants | 106 Participants | 331 Participants |
| Education Complete/some elementary school | 220 Participants | 236 Participants | 246 Participants | 702 Participants |
| Education Complete/some secondary school | 426 Participants | 430 Participants | 418 Participants | 1274 Participants |
| Education Professional or higher | 86 Participants | 77 Participants | 81 Participants | 244 Participants |
| Education Technician | 150 Participants | 147 Participants | 144 Participants | 441 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Do not know/Do not answer | 16 Participants | 26 Participants | 28 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Less than once every 10 years | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Once every 2-3 years | 174 Participants | 181 Participants | 176 Participants | 531 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Once every 4-5 years | 54 Participants | 59 Participants | 64 Participants | 177 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Once every 6-10 years | 24 Participants | 25 Participants | 22 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Frequency of cytology use Once or more than once every year | 608 Participants | 593 Participants | 590 Participants | 1791 Participants |
| Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers) Healthcare Management Organization #1 | 196 Participants | 233 Participants | 207 Participants | 636 Participants |
| Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers) Healthcare Management Organization #2 | 461 Participants | 442 Participants | 461 Participants | 1364 Participants |
| Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers) Healthcare Management Organization #3 | 225 Participants | 215 Participants | 221 Participants | 661 Participants |
| Marital Satus Divorced/separated | 70 Participants | 83 Participants | 83 Participants | 236 Participants |
| Marital Satus Married/cohabiting | 420 Participants | 440 Participants | 446 Participants | 1306 Participants |
| Marital Satus Single | 361 Participants | 333 Participants | 335 Participants | 1029 Participants |
| Marital Satus Widowed | 31 Participants | 34 Participants | 25 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Colombia | 882 Participants | 890 Participants | 889 Participants | 2661 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 882 Participants | 890 Participants | 889 Participants | 2661 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 882 | 0 / 890 | 0 / 889 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 882 | 0 / 890 | 0 / 889 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 882 | 0 / 890 | 0 / 889 |
Outcome results
Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+
Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by the community pathologists during the two years of follow-up. The first community-based CIN2+ diagnosis was adjudicated to the participant (including the exit visit if none community-based CIN2+ during the two years of follow-up). This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.
Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)
Population: Cumulative cases of CIN2+ diagnosed by the community pathologists from the healthcare institutions according to arm
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based <CIN2 | 847 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN2 | 30 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN3 | 4 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based Cancer | 1 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based Cancer | 1 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based <CIN2 | 835 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN3 | 11 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN2 | 43 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based Cancer | 0 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN2 | 31 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based CIN3 | 10 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+ | Community-based <CIN2 | 848 Participants |
Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health
This outcome was measured using the HPV Impact Profile (HIP) scale through the following five domains: concerns about cancer and loss of fertility; emotional impact (depression and anxiety); self-image; interaction with the medical staff (pain or discomfort during the visit); and impact upon the life and its control. The response to each domain was measured on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=not at all, 1-3=a little, 4-6=somewhat, 7-9=a great deal, 10=extremely) and was then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100. A total score was calculated by adding all the items. Values \<40 indicate no or little impact, between 40 and 70 moderate impact, and \>70 indicate high psychosocial impact. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit
Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after receiving the triage result | 25.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.48 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns at enrollment | 35.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.23 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after one year of the triage result | 18.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.07 |
| CYTOLOGY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after receiving the triage result | 25.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.42 |
| CYTOLOGY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns at enrollment | 38.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.45 |
| CYTOLOGY | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after one year of the triage result | 18.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.38 |
| HPV Test | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns at enrollment | 36.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.72 |
| HPV Test | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after one year of the triage result | 17.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
| HPV Test | Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health | Concerns after receiving the triage result | 27.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.11 |
Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+
Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts obtained after histological review of biopsies emitted by the community pathologists. Biopsies obtained during the two years of follow-up and the exit visit were reviewed by a panel of two external experts and a final result was adjudicated to each participant based on the panel of experts and the community of pathologists. This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.
Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)
Population: Cumulative cases of CIN2+ diagnosed by a panel of external expert pathologists according to arm
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed <CIN2 | 813 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN2 | 51 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN3 | 16 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed Cancer | 2 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed Cancer | 2 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed <CIN2 | 809 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN3 | 18 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN2 | 61 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed Cancer | 0 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN2 | 48 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed CIN3 | 14 Participants |
| HPV Test | Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+ | Reviewed <CIN2 | 827 Participants |
Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization
The outcome is defined as the number of cytologies, colposcopies, and histologies routinely performed during the two years of follow-up. Records were identified in databases or manually searched from clinical records. This outcome will be used for the analysis of the efficiency of the three strategies.
Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to before the exit visit (i.e., excluding clinical records collected at the exit visit)
Population: Utilization of cytology, colposcopy and histology during the routine follow-up of women with ASC-US cytology stratified by arm
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Cytology utilization | 904 Clinical records |
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Colposcopy utilization | 964 Clinical records |
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Histology utilization | 572 Clinical records |
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Total utilization | 2440 Clinical records |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Total utilization | 2076 Clinical records |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Cytology utilization | 1218 Clinical records |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Histology utilization | 349 Clinical records |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Colposcopy utilization | 509 Clinical records |
| HPV Test | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Total utilization | 1850 Clinical records |
| HPV Test | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Colposcopy utilization | 633 Clinical records |
| HPV Test | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Histology utilization | 401 Clinical records |
| HPV Test | Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization | Cytology utilization | 816 Clinical records |
Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts after reviewing biopsies collected at the exit visit, two years after the enrolment. This outcome is an estimate of the remaining disease that was not detected by the strategies during the 2 years of follow-up. The outcome was obtained after the review of all the biopsies taken during the exit visit. Biopsies were taken using a standardized research protocol to ensure the completeness of the remaining disease. Basically, all women attending the exit visit were tested with HPV testing and Pap and referred to colposcopy if any HPV positive or abnormal cytology. The colposcopy was performed by a researcher of the study team who took up to two biopsies from the observed lesion plus one or two at random if none lesion was observed. All biopsies were reviewed by the external panel. This outcome is used for the efficiency analysis of the three strategies.
Time frame: Exit visit (two years after the enrolment)
Population: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ detected at the exit visit (2 years after the enrolment) of women with ASC-US cytology stratified by arm
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed <CIN2 | 852 Participants |
| COLPOSCOPY | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | 30 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed <CIN2 | 851 Participants |
| CYTOLOGY | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | 39 Participants |
| HPV Test | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed <CIN2 | 866 Participants |
| HPV Test | Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | Exit-reviewed CIN2+ | 23 Participants |
Self-esteem
Self-esteem corresponds to the self-assessment of a positive or negative evaluation toward oneself. This outcome was measured using the Rosenberg Scale through 10 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 1 and 4 (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, 4=strongly disagree). Total values range between 10 and 40 where lower scores suggest lower self-esteem. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit
Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after receiving the triage result | 34.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.84 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem at enrollment | 32.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after one year of the triage result | 35.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.43 |
| CYTOLOGY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after receiving the triage result | 33.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.38 |
| CYTOLOGY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem at enrollment | 33.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.25 |
| CYTOLOGY | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after one year of the triage result | 35.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.26 |
| HPV Test | Self-esteem | Self-esteem at enrollment | 32.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.17 |
| HPV Test | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after one year of the triage result | 35.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.84 |
| HPV Test | Self-esteem | Self-esteem after receiving the triage result | 34.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.78 |
State Anxiety
State anxiety refers to the transitory tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety). This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit
Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | State Anxiety | State anxiety after receiving the triage result | 14.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.11 |
| COLPOSCOPY | State Anxiety | State anxiety at enrollment | 15.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.23 |
| COLPOSCOPY | State Anxiety | State anxiety after one year of the triage result | 9.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.79 |
| CYTOLOGY | State Anxiety | State anxiety after receiving the triage result | 13.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.55 |
| CYTOLOGY | State Anxiety | State anxiety at enrollment | 13.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.03 |
| CYTOLOGY | State Anxiety | State anxiety after one year of the triage result | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| HPV Test | State Anxiety | State anxiety at enrollment | 14.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.45 |
| HPV Test | State Anxiety | State anxiety after one year of the triage result | 9.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.38 |
| HPV Test | State Anxiety | State anxiety after receiving the triage result | 14.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.65 |
Trait Anxiety
Trait anxiety refers to the sustainable tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety) in various situations. This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit
Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLPOSCOPY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after receiving the triage result | 16.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.14 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety at enrollment | 17.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.27 |
| COLPOSCOPY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after one year of the triage result | 14.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.95 |
| CYTOLOGY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after receiving the triage result | 16.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.08 |
| CYTOLOGY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety at enrollment | 17.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.34 |
| CYTOLOGY | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after one year of the triage result | 13.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.15 |
| HPV Test | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety at enrollment | 17.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| HPV Test | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after one year of the triage result | 14.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.51 |
| HPV Test | Trait Anxiety | Trait anxiety after receiving the triage result | 17.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.8 |