Skip to content

Optimal Strategy for the Management of ASCUS Cytology in Health Care Services of Medellin, Colombia

Evaluation of Strategies for Optimal Clinical Management of Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02067468
Acronym
ASCUS-COL
Enrollment
2661
Registered
2014-02-20
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2019-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Abnormalities, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3, Cervical Cancer

Keywords

Human Papillomavirus, cervical cancer, health services research, Colombia, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Brief summary

Cervical cancer as well cervical preneoplastic abnormalities (CIN2+) are cause by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. These abnormalities have been historically detected by cervical cytology, but recent evidence shows that HPV testing is superior to cytology to detect cervical lesions that eventually will progress to cancer. Despite evidence, conventional cytology (Pap) remains as a primary screening test in Colombia and HPV test is recommended as a triage test for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in settings around the world. Women with ASC-US have low risk to CIN2+ but higher than healthy population, and therefore it is important to provide appropriate clinical management. However, there is no consensus of how to deal women with ASC-US and therefore there are still three strategies for this purpose: 1) immediate colposcopy, 2) repeat conventional cytology at 6 and 12 months and 3) HPV testing. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and the efficient among the strategies as well as to evaluate the acceptability of the HPV testing in a real-life setting.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of immediate colposcopy (IC), repeat conventional cytology at 6 and 12 months (RC) and HPV triage (HPV) (QIAGEN-The digene HPV Test®) for the clinical management of women with ASC-US insured in healthcare management organizations (HMO) within the Colombian health security system. This study randomized 2,661 20-69 years old women with ASC-US, insured in HMOs in Medellin-Colombia to 3 arms: IC, RC and HPV. All women are scheduled for a visit at 2 years after recruitment that includes HPV-test/cytology and colposcopy either if HPV+ (RLU\>=1) or abnormal cytology (\>=ASC-US). This colposcopy is performed by a trained colposcopist and women are followed-up according to a well-defined algorithm. The fewer high-grade cervical neoplasia (CIN2+) rate at the end of following will determine the most effective arm. The most efficiency arm will be which reach the major effective with the minimum resource (cytologies, colposcopies and histologies) consumed. The resource consumed is being retrieved from the HMOs. This study also pretends to evaluate the acceptability of the HPV testing. This study will allow us to know if within the Colombian health security system, the HPV test will remain superior to repeating cytology and/or to immediate colposcopy as it has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials carried out in outside settings.

Interventions

DEVICEHPV test

QIAGEN - The Digene HPV test®

PROCEDURECOLPOSCOPY

Colposcopy routine health services

DEVICEcytology

Cytology routine health services

Sponsors

International Agency for Research on Cancer
CollaboratorOTHER
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EPS SURA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
EPS COMFAMA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
EPS COMFENALCO
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
DINAMICA IPS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Laboratorio Clínico Escuela de Microbiología (Universidad de Antioquia)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Metrosalud
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universidad de Antioquia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASC-US cytology, living in metropolitan area of Medellin

Exclusion criteria

* Previous abnormal cytology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by the community pathologists during the two years of follow-up. The first community-based CIN2+ diagnosis was adjudicated to the participant (including the exit visit if none community-based CIN2+ during the two years of follow-up). This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit visit (two years after the enrolment)Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts after reviewing biopsies collected at the exit visit, two years after the enrolment. This outcome is an estimate of the remaining disease that was not detected by the strategies during the 2 years of follow-up. The outcome was obtained after the review of all the biopsies taken during the exit visit. Biopsies were taken using a standardized research protocol to ensure the completeness of the remaining disease. Basically, all women attending the exit visit were tested with HPV testing and Pap and referred to colposcopy if any HPV positive or abnormal cytology. The colposcopy was performed by a researcher of the study team who took up to two biopsies from the observed lesion plus one or two at random if none lesion was observed. All biopsies were reviewed by the external panel. This outcome is used for the efficiency analysis of the three strategies.
Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationTwo years since the enrolment to before the exit visit (i.e., excluding clinical records collected at the exit visit)The outcome is defined as the number of cytologies, colposcopies, and histologies routinely performed during the two years of follow-up. Records were identified in databases or manually searched from clinical records. This outcome will be used for the analysis of the efficiency of the three strategies.
Self-esteemTwo years between the enrolment and the exit visitSelf-esteem corresponds to the self-assessment of a positive or negative evaluation toward oneself. This outcome was measured using the Rosenberg Scale through 10 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 1 and 4 (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, 4=strongly disagree). Total values range between 10 and 40 where lower scores suggest lower self-esteem. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts obtained after histological review of biopsies emitted by the community pathologists. Biopsies obtained during the two years of follow-up and the exit visit were reviewed by a panel of two external experts and a final result was adjudicated to each participant based on the panel of experts and the community of pathologists. This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.
State AnxietyTwo years between the enrolment and the exit visitState anxiety refers to the transitory tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety). This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthTwo years between the enrolment and the exit visitThis outcome was measured using the HPV Impact Profile (HIP) scale through the following five domains: concerns about cancer and loss of fertility; emotional impact (depression and anxiety); self-image; interaction with the medical staff (pain or discomfort during the visit); and impact upon the life and its control. The response to each domain was measured on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=not at all, 1-3=a little, 4-6=somewhat, 7-9=a great deal, 10=extremely) and was then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100. A total score was calculated by adding all the items. Values \<40 indicate no or little impact, between 40 and 70 moderate impact, and \>70 indicate high psychosocial impact. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.
Trait AnxietyTwo years between the enrolment and the exit visitTrait anxiety refers to the sustainable tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety) in various situations. This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.

Countries

Colombia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

After a great effort, due to logistic issues, it was only possible to enroll 2661 participants instead of 3000 as it had been stated in the submitted protocol. Despite it, the trial had enough statistical power to answer the research questions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
COLPOSCOPY
Women with ASC-US cytology are immediately referred to colposcopy COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services
882
CYTOLOGY
Women with ASC-US Cytology are follow-up with cytology at 6 and/or 12 months and be referred to colposcopy if any of these cytologies is ASC-US or higher COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services cytology: Cytology routine health services
890
HPV Test
Women with ASC-US cytology are HPV tested and those HPV positive are referred to Colposcopy HPV test: QIAGEN - The Digene HPV test® COLPOSCOPY: Colposcopy routine health services
889
Total2,661

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCOLPOSCOPYCYTOLOGYHPV TestTotal
Age, Continuous37.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
37 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
37.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
37.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Age, Customized
Age, years
20-30
290 Participants305 Participants289 Participants884 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, years
31-40
240 Participants248 Participants233 Participants721 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, years
41-50
239 Participants225 Participants261 Participants725 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, years
51-69
113 Participants112 Participants106 Participants331 Participants
Education
Complete/some elementary school
220 Participants236 Participants246 Participants702 Participants
Education
Complete/some secondary school
426 Participants430 Participants418 Participants1274 Participants
Education
Professional or higher
86 Participants77 Participants81 Participants244 Participants
Education
Technician
150 Participants147 Participants144 Participants441 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Do not know/Do not answer
16 Participants26 Participants28 Participants70 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Less than once every 10 years
6 Participants6 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Once every 2-3 years
174 Participants181 Participants176 Participants531 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Once every 4-5 years
54 Participants59 Participants64 Participants177 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Once every 6-10 years
24 Participants25 Participants22 Participants71 Participants
Frequency of cytology use
Once or more than once every year
608 Participants593 Participants590 Participants1791 Participants
Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers)
Healthcare Management Organization #1
196 Participants233 Participants207 Participants636 Participants
Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers)
Healthcare Management Organization #2
461 Participants442 Participants461 Participants1364 Participants
Healthcare Management Organization (Secondary centers)
Healthcare Management Organization #3
225 Participants215 Participants221 Participants661 Participants
Marital Satus
Divorced/separated
70 Participants83 Participants83 Participants236 Participants
Marital Satus
Married/cohabiting
420 Participants440 Participants446 Participants1306 Participants
Marital Satus
Single
361 Participants333 Participants335 Participants1029 Participants
Marital Satus
Widowed
31 Participants34 Participants25 Participants90 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
882 Participants890 Participants889 Participants2661 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
882 Participants890 Participants889 Participants2661 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8820 / 8900 / 889
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 8820 / 8900 / 889
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 8820 / 8900 / 889

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+

Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by the community pathologists during the two years of follow-up. The first community-based CIN2+ diagnosis was adjudicated to the participant (including the exit visit if none community-based CIN2+ during the two years of follow-up). This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.

Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)

Population: Cumulative cases of CIN2+ diagnosed by the community pathologists from the healthcare institutions according to arm

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based <CIN2847 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN230 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN34 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based Cancer1 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based Cancer1 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based <CIN2835 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN311 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN243 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based Cancer0 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN231 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based CIN310 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by the Community Pathologist With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Community-based CIN2+Community-based <CIN2848 Participants
Secondary

Concerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological Health

This outcome was measured using the HPV Impact Profile (HIP) scale through the following five domains: concerns about cancer and loss of fertility; emotional impact (depression and anxiety); self-image; interaction with the medical staff (pain or discomfort during the visit); and impact upon the life and its control. The response to each domain was measured on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=not at all, 1-3=a little, 4-6=somewhat, 7-9=a great deal, 10=extremely) and was then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100. A total score was calculated by adding all the items. Values \<40 indicate no or little impact, between 40 and 70 moderate impact, and \>70 indicate high psychosocial impact. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.

Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit

Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
COLPOSCOPYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after receiving the triage result25.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.48
COLPOSCOPYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns at enrollment35.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.23
COLPOSCOPYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after one year of the triage result18.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07
CYTOLOGYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after receiving the triage result25.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.42
CYTOLOGYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns at enrollment38.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.45
CYTOLOGYConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after one year of the triage result18.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.38
HPV TestConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns at enrollment36.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.72
HPV TestConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after one year of the triage result17.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
HPV TestConcerns About Fertility, Cancer, and Gynecological HealthConcerns after receiving the triage result27.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.11
Secondary

Cumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+

Cumulative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts obtained after histological review of biopsies emitted by the community pathologists. Biopsies obtained during the two years of follow-up and the exit visit were reviewed by a panel of two external experts and a final result was adjudicated to each participant based on the panel of experts and the community of pathologists. This outcome is used for the effectiveness analysis of the three strategies.

Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to the exit visit (inclusive)

Population: Cumulative cases of CIN2+ diagnosed by a panel of external expert pathologists according to arm

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed <CIN2813 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN251 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN316 Participants
COLPOSCOPYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed Cancer2 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed Cancer2 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed <CIN2809 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN318 Participants
CYTOLOGYCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN261 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed Cancer0 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN248 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed CIN314 Participants
HPV TestCumulative Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+): Reviewed CIN2+Reviewed <CIN2827 Participants
Secondary

Number of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care Utilization

The outcome is defined as the number of cytologies, colposcopies, and histologies routinely performed during the two years of follow-up. Records were identified in databases or manually searched from clinical records. This outcome will be used for the analysis of the efficiency of the three strategies.

Time frame: Two years since the enrolment to before the exit visit (i.e., excluding clinical records collected at the exit visit)

Population: Utilization of cytology, colposcopy and histology during the routine follow-up of women with ASC-US cytology stratified by arm

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationCytology utilization904 Clinical records
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationColposcopy utilization964 Clinical records
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationHistology utilization572 Clinical records
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationTotal utilization2440 Clinical records
CYTOLOGYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationTotal utilization2076 Clinical records
CYTOLOGYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationCytology utilization1218 Clinical records
CYTOLOGYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationHistology utilization349 Clinical records
CYTOLOGYNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationColposcopy utilization509 Clinical records
HPV TestNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationTotal utilization1850 Clinical records
HPV TestNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationColposcopy utilization633 Clinical records
HPV TestNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationHistology utilization401 Clinical records
HPV TestNumber of Clinical Records (Cytologies, Colposcopies, and Histologies): Health Care UtilizationCytology utilization816 Clinical records
Secondary

Number of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) diagnosed by a panel of external experts after reviewing biopsies collected at the exit visit, two years after the enrolment. This outcome is an estimate of the remaining disease that was not detected by the strategies during the 2 years of follow-up. The outcome was obtained after the review of all the biopsies taken during the exit visit. Biopsies were taken using a standardized research protocol to ensure the completeness of the remaining disease. Basically, all women attending the exit visit were tested with HPV testing and Pap and referred to colposcopy if any HPV positive or abnormal cytology. The colposcopy was performed by a researcher of the study team who took up to two biopsies from the observed lesion plus one or two at random if none lesion was observed. All biopsies were reviewed by the external panel. This outcome is used for the efficiency analysis of the three strategies.

Time frame: Exit visit (two years after the enrolment)

Population: Exit-reviewed CIN2+ detected at the exit visit (2 years after the enrolment) of women with ASC-US cytology stratified by arm

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed <CIN2852 Participants
COLPOSCOPYNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed CIN2+30 Participants
CYTOLOGYNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed <CIN2851 Participants
CYTOLOGYNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed CIN2+39 Participants
HPV TestNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed <CIN2866 Participants
HPV TestNumber of Participants Diagnosed by a Panel of External Experts With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Higher (CIN2+) at the Exit Visit, Two Years After the Enrolment: Exit-reviewed CIN2+Exit-reviewed CIN2+23 Participants
Secondary

Self-esteem

Self-esteem corresponds to the self-assessment of a positive or negative evaluation toward oneself. This outcome was measured using the Rosenberg Scale through 10 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 1 and 4 (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, 4=strongly disagree). Total values range between 10 and 40 where lower scores suggest lower self-esteem. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.

Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit

Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
COLPOSCOPYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after receiving the triage result34.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
COLPOSCOPYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem at enrollment32.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
COLPOSCOPYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after one year of the triage result35.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
CYTOLOGYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after receiving the triage result33.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.38
CYTOLOGYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem at enrollment33.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
CYTOLOGYSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after one year of the triage result35.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.26
HPV TestSelf-esteemSelf-esteem at enrollment32.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.17
HPV TestSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after one year of the triage result35.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
HPV TestSelf-esteemSelf-esteem after receiving the triage result34.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.78
Secondary

State Anxiety

State anxiety refers to the transitory tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety). This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.

Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit

Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
COLPOSCOPYState AnxietyState anxiety after receiving the triage result14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.11
COLPOSCOPYState AnxietyState anxiety at enrollment15.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.23
COLPOSCOPYState AnxietyState anxiety after one year of the triage result9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.79
CYTOLOGYState AnxietyState anxiety after receiving the triage result13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.55
CYTOLOGYState AnxietyState anxiety at enrollment13.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.03
CYTOLOGYState AnxietyState anxiety after one year of the triage result10.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.76
HPV TestState AnxietyState anxiety at enrollment14.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
HPV TestState AnxietyState anxiety after one year of the triage result9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.38
HPV TestState AnxietyState anxiety after receiving the triage result14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.65
Secondary

Trait Anxiety

Trait anxiety refers to the sustainable tendency to experience negative emotions (such as fears, worries, and anxiety) in various situations. This outcome was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) through 20 Likert-type questions with scores varying between 0 and 3 (0=not at all, 1=somewhat, 2=moderately, 3=very much). Total values range between 0 and 60 where higher scores suggest higher levels of anxiety. This outcome was measured at the enrollment visit, between two weeks and two months after receiving the triage result, and after one year of receiving the triage result.

Time frame: Two years between the enrolment and the exit visit

Population: This is a nested analysis that included 394 subjects of the ASCUS-COL trial (142 in COLPOSCOPY, 103 in CYTOLOGY, and 149 HPV) who accepted to participate and completed the follow-up of three measurements over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
COLPOSCOPYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after receiving the triage result16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.14
COLPOSCOPYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety at enrollment17.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
COLPOSCOPYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after one year of the triage result14.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
CYTOLOGYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after receiving the triage result16.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
CYTOLOGYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety at enrollment17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
CYTOLOGYTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after one year of the triage result13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
HPV TestTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety at enrollment17.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
HPV TestTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after one year of the triage result14.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.51
HPV TestTrait AnxietyTrait anxiety after receiving the triage result17.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026