Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Chronic Migraine Prevention

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Chronic Migraine Prevention

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02066415
Enrollment
667
Registered
2014-02-19
Start date
2014-03-05
Completion date
2016-04-28
Last updated
2022-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment for Prevention of Chronic Migraine

Keywords

Chronic Migraine

Brief summary

To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on the change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days in adults with chronic migraine.

Detailed description

This study consisted of the following phases: screening, 4-week baseline phase, 12-week double-blind treatment, and 12-week follow-up. Participants may have elected to participate in the optional pharmacokinetic substudy and the optional, novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment substudy. Participants who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment phase of Study 20120295 were eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study (Study 20130255; NCT02174861).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALErenumab

Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff.

DRUGPlacebo

Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of at least 5 attacks of migraine without aura and/or migraine with visual sensory, speech and/or language, retinal or brainstem aura. * History of ≥ 15 headache days per month of which ≥ 8 headache days were assessed by the subject as migraine day. * ≥ 4 distinct headache episodes, each lasting ≥ 4 hours OR if shorter, associated with use of a triptan or ergot-derivative on the same calendar day based on the eDiary calculations. * Demonstrated at least 80% compliance with the eDiary.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cluster headache or hemiplegic migraine headache * Unable to differentiate migraine from other headaches * Failed \> 3 medication categories due to lack of efficacy for prophylactic treatment of migraine . * Received botulinum toxinin head or neck region within 4 months prior to screening. * Used a prohibited migraine prophylactic medication, device or procedure within 2 months prior to the start of the baseline phase

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phaseA migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phaseA migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase \* 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%.
Change From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phaseMonthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days is the number of days on which migraine specific medications were used between monthly doses of study drug. Migraine-specific medications includes two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications.
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phaseThe cumulative duration of any qualified headache between monthly doses of study drug regardless of acute treatment use. A qualified headache was defined as follows: * a qualified migraine headache (including an aura-only event that is treated with acute migraine-specific medication), or * a qualified non-migraine headache, which is a headache that lasted continuously for ≥ 4 hours and was not a qualified migraine headache, or * a headache of any duration for which acute headache treatment was administered.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (24 weeks)Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, where: Grade 1 = Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ErenumabBaseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24Blood samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against erenumab. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence indicates participants with a negative or no result at baseline and a positive result at any time post-baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 69 centers in Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Norway, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States of America (USA). The first participant was enrolled on 05 March 2014 and the last participant enrolled on 05 November 2015.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 3:2:2 ratio to receive placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg. Randomization was stratified by region (North America vs Other) and medication overuse status at baseline (Yes vs No).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection.
286
Erenumab 70 mg
Participants received 70 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection.
191
Erenumab 140 mg
Participants received 140 mg erenumab on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8 by subcutaneous injection.
190
Total667

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDecision by Sponsor542
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up722
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject914

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboErenumab 70 mgErenumab 140 mgTotal
Age, Continuous42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Age, Customized
18 to 64 years
285 Participants191 Participants190 Participants666 Participants
Age, Customized
65 to 74 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Disease Duration of Migraine With or Without Aura22.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63
20.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.83
21.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
21.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.46
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants7 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
277 Participants184 Participants180 Participants641 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Medication Overuse Status
No
169 Participants112 Participants112 Participants393 Participants
Medication Overuse Status
Yes
117 Participants79 Participants78 Participants274 Participants
Monthly Migraine Days18.22 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73
17.85 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.39
17.78 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.72
17.99 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.63
Prior Migraine Prophylactic Medication
No
68 Participants53 Participants54 Participants175 Participants
Prior Migraine Prophylactic Medication
Yes
218 Participants138 Participants136 Participants492 Participants
Prior Migraine Prophylactic Treatment Failure
No
86 Participants64 Participants64 Participants214 Participants
Prior Migraine Prophylactic Treatment Failure
Yes
200 Participants127 Participants126 Participants453 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
11 Participants10 Participants6 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
268 Participants176 Participants184 Participants628 Participants
Region
North America
135 Participants91 Participants89 Participants315 Participants
Region
Other
151 Participants100 Participants101 Participants352 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
226 Participants166 Participants160 Participants552 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants25 Participants30 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 2826 / 1903 / 188
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 2826 / 1902 / 188

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days

A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine with or without aura. The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase.

Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase

Population: The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement. The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days-4.18 migraine days / month
Erenumab 70 mgChange From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days-6.64 migraine days / month
Erenumab 140 mgChange From Baseline in Monthly Migraine Days-6.63 migraine days / month
Comparison: The primary endpoint was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.52, -1.39]Generalized linear mixed model
Comparison: The primary endpoint was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.51, -1.38]Generalized linear mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours

The cumulative duration of any qualified headache between monthly doses of study drug regardless of acute treatment use. A qualified headache was defined as follows: * a qualified migraine headache (including an aura-only event that is treated with acute migraine-specific medication), or * a qualified non-migraine headache, which is a headache that lasted continuously for ≥ 4 hours and was not a qualified migraine headache, or * a headache of any duration for which acute headache treatment was administered.

Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase

Population: The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement.~The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours-55.22 hours / month
Erenumab 70 mgChange From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours-64.76 hours / month
Erenumab 140 mgChange From Baseline in Cumulative Monthly Headache Hours-74.53 hours / month
Comparison: Analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: 0.2895% CI: [-26.98, 7.9]Generalized linear mixed model
Comparison: Analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: 0.0395% CI: [-36.71, -1.92]Generalized linear mixed model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days

Monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days is the number of days on which migraine specific medications were used between monthly doses of study drug. Migraine-specific medications includes two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications.

Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase

Population: The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement.~The number of participants analyzed includes those with observed data at week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days-1.58 acute migraine treatment days / month
Erenumab 70 mgChange From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days-3.45 acute migraine treatment days / month
Erenumab 140 mgChange From Baseline in Monthly Acute Migraine-specific Medication Treatment Days-4.13 acute migraine treatment days / month
Comparison: Analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.6, -1.13]Generalized linear mixed model
Comparison: Analyzed using a linear mixed effects model including treatment group, baseline value, stratification factors (region and medication overuse status), scheduled visit, and the interaction of treatment group with scheduled visit.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.28, -1.82]Generalized linear mixed model
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Erenumab

Blood samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against erenumab. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence indicates participants with a negative or no result at baseline and a positive result at any time post-baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

Population: Randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and with available post-baseline antibody data. This endpoint was analyzed in the erenumab treatment groups only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ErenumabBinding antibody positive11 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ErenumabNeutralizing antibody positive0 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ErenumabBinding antibody positive3 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ErenumabNeutralizing antibody positive0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, where: Grade 1 = Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5 = Death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (24 weeks)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 265 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 40 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event110 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsFatal adverse events0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 313 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 41 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event83 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 245 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 311 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events6 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug0 Participants
Erenumab 70 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsFatal adverse events0 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events2 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 242 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsFatal adverse events0 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug2 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 40 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs grade ≥ 34 Participants
Erenumab 140 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event88 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline

A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of treatment. At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase \* 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%.

Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase

Population: The efficacy analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed at least 1 post-baseline monthly eDiary measurement.~Participants with missing post-baseline data were counted as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline23.5 percentage of participants
Erenumab 70 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline39.9 percentage of participants
Erenumab 140 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Monthly Migraine Days From Baseline41.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test after the missing data were imputed as non-response, stratified by stratification factors (region and medication overuse status).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.46, 3.27]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test after the missing data were imputed as non-response, stratified by stratification factors (region and medication overuse status).p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.56, 3.51]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026