Skip to content

Trigger-point Blockade in Persistent Pain After Open Groin Hernia Repair

Trigger-point Blockade in Persistent Pain After Open Groin Hernia Repair

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02065219
Acronym
Trigger-open
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-02-17
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

Chronic Pain, Inguinal Hernia, Outcome, Surgical Procedure, Operative

Brief summary

Groin hernia repair is a common procedure performed in approximately 2,000 patients per one million inhabitants. Severe chronic pain following groin hernia repair is seen in 2-5% of the patients indicating that a large number of patients each year suffer from debilitating reduction in health-related quality of life. This study examines the effect of ultra-sound guided blocks with local anesthesia in the groin in regard to pain relief and sleep quality. The hypothesis of the study is that a block will confer significant pain relief to patients with severe chronic pain following open groin hernia repair.

Detailed description

This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in subjects with severe pain after open groin hernia, examines the effect of an ultra-sound guided local anesthetic block of a trigger-point, situated near the spermatic cord at the superficial inguinal ring. In order to compare effects and distribution of the blocks in patients vs. healthy subjects, the block is tested and examined in volunteers using a similar methodology.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

10 ml of bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml deposited by ultra-sound guidance around the spermatic cord

DRUGPlacebo

10 ml 0.9% physiological saline deposited by ultra-sound guidance around the spermatic cord

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with persistent pain (\< 6 mo) after open groin hernia repair * Patients with maximal pain area 3 cm or less from the superficial inguinal ring * Patients living in the Capital Region of Denmark (Region Hovedstaden) or the Region of Zealand (Region Sjælland)

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics of amide-type * Declared incapable of making his/hers own affairs * Does not comprehend Danish in the written or spoken language * Cognitive impairment to a degree influencing the testing reliability * Known recurrence of the inguinal hernia * Other surgical procedures performed in the groin or on the external genitals * Neuropathy affecting the groin region caused by other conditions, e.g. post-stroke, multiple sclerosis, herniated intervertebral disc * Abuse of alcohol or drugs * Unable to cooperate with the sensory examinations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Normalized summed pain intensity difference (SPID)20 minThe number of patients with normalized summed pain intensity differences (SPID) of more or equal to 50% after bupivacaine AND SPID less or equal to 25% after placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suprathreshold heat stimulation20 minQuantitative changes in pain ratings to suprathreshold heat stimulation after bupivacaine compared to placebo
Pressure pain thresholds20 minQuantitative changes in pain rating to pressure algometry stimulation after bupivacaine compared to placebo
Thermal thresholds20 minQuantitative changes in thermal thresholds (warmth detection threshold, cool detection thresholds, heat pain threshold) after bupivacaine compared to placebo
Pain questionnaire7 daysQuantitative changes in summed pain intensity differences (SPIDs) during rest, movement and during auto-palpation, assessed morning and evening after bupivacaine compared to placebo
Sleep quality7 daysQuantitative changes in sleep quality assessed each morning, after bupivacaine compared to placebo
Sensory mapping20 minQuantitative changes in area of cool hypoesthesia assessed by a thermal roller after bupivacaine compared to placebo

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026