Skip to content

High-dose Vitamin D Supplementation for ADT-induced Side Effects

High-dose Vitamin D Supplementation for ADT-induced Side Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02064946
Enrollment
108
Registered
2014-02-17
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Mineral Density Quantitative Trait Locus 3, Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

prostate cancer, bone density, vitamin D, micronutrients, pharmacologic actions

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a high-dose vitamin D supplementation regimen in reducing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-related side effects in older prostate cancer patients on ADT. The proposed study is a randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, controlled clinical trial that will accrue 76 prostate cancer patients without severe bone loss, aged 60 and older, beginning ADT, and scheduled to receive at least 6 months more of ADT. Participants will be randomized to: 1) weekly high-dose vitamin D3 (50,000 IU) or 2) vitamin D placebo only for a period of 24 weeks. Both groups will also receive a daily multivitamin and calcium supplement.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesize high-dose vitamin D supplementation will reduce androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-related side effects including ADT-induced bone loss, decreased muscle mass, falls, reduced muscle strength, and diminished physical performance in older prostate cancer patients. The vitamin D supplementation is aimed at reducing fracture risk by maintaining proper bone density, thereby preventing osteoporotic/osteopenic conditions and increasing muscle mass. Both vitamin D and exercise are efficacious in maintaining proper bone health and muscle mass among the general population, but little research has been done on prostate cancer patients and survivors. Vitamin D could reduce fracture risk among prostate cancer survivors.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTvitamin D

50,000IU/week of vitamin D3

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
60 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a confirmed diagnosis of stage I-IIIA prostate cancer * Within 6 months of starting ADT with an additional 6 more months planned. * Participants must have sub-optimal vitamin D levels of \<32 ng/ml. * Participants must agree not to take calcium and/or vitamin D supplements for the duration of the intervention other than those provided. * Participants must have an ionized serum calcium level within normal limits (1.19-1.29mmol/L) and a total corrected serum calcium of ≤10.5 mg/dl. * No contraindications for fitness testing and no physical limitations (e.g. cardiorespiratory, orthopedic, nervous system) as assessed by their physician. * Able to read English (since the assessment materials are in printed format). * Able to swallow medication and provide written informed consent. * 60 years of age or older.

Exclusion criteria

* Previously verified diagnosis of osteoporosis (any t-score ≤ -2.5). * Patients on antiresorptive drugs (i.e. bisphosphonates) within the past year. * Patients with hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca \> 10.5 mg/dl) or a history of hypercalcemia or vitamin D toxicity/sensitivity. * Patients with impaired renal function (CrCl \< 60 mL/min) or who had kidney stones (calcium salt) within the past 5 years. * Myocardial infarction within the past year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bone mineral densityafter 24 weeksmean difference in bone mineral density between treatment group and control group
bone biomarkersafter 24 weeksamino-terminal collagen crosslinks (NTx) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
muscle massafter 24 weeksmuscle mass as assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
muscular strengthafter 24 weeksas assessed by Handgrip Dynamometer and 7-10 Repetition Maximum
physical performanceafter 24 weeksas assessed by falls, physical performance battery, and 6-min walk test

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026