Skip to content

Renal Nerve Denervation in Patients With Hypertension and Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Renal Nerve Denervation in Patients With Hypertension and Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02064764
Acronym
Symplicity AF
Enrollment
102
Registered
2014-02-17
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2021-04-19
Last updated
2024-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing both renal nerve denervation and pulmonary vein isolation on the same patient with the intent of characterizing both safety and effectiveness in a paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation population with hypertension. To assess safety, the study will measure the occurrence of a composite safety endpoint and, to assess effectiveness, the study will measure freedom of chronic treatment failure through a minimum of six months of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICESymplicity Spyral™ Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation Catheter
DEVICEArctic Front Advance™ Cardiac Cryoablation System

Sponsors

Medtronic Vascular
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Drug refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation * Office-based systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg based despite treatment with 1 or more antihypertensive medications * Age 18 years to 80 years old. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Renal artery anatomy that is ineligible for treatment including: Lacks at least one renal artery for each kidney with ≥3 mm diameter and minimum treatable length per the Spyral Instructions for Use, Renal artery stenosis (\>50%) or renal artery aneurysm in either renal artery, A history of prior renal artery intervention including balloon angioplasty or stenting, Renal artery which contain calcification which does not allow at least four radio frequency ablations to be delivered , Diffuse fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) or FMD which does not allow at least four radio frequency ablations to be delivered; FMD defined as visible beading of the artery on angiography , Unilateral kidney. * Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate of \<30 mL/min/1.73m2. * Pregnant, nursing or planning to be pregnant. (Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test prior to angiography). * Currently enrolled or plans to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Co-enrollment in concurrent studies is allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects in Each Arm That Experience Safety Composite EventsUp to one or six months post procedure depending on the eventCharacterize the rate of safety composite events, (End stage renal disease, Death, Significant Embolic Event, Renal Artery Perforation or Dissection Requiring Intervention, Vascular Complications, Hospitalization for Hypertensive Crisis, New Renal Artery Stenosis, Cardiac Damage, Pulmonary Vein Stenosis, Atrio-Esophageal Fistula, Arrhythmia, Persistent Phrenic Nerve Palsy), within each of the two study arms and also characterize the difference in the rates between study arms. Each event in the composite has its own time frame, either one month or six months post procedure.
Proportion of Patients With Chronic Treatment SuccessMinimum of six monthsChronic treatment success is freedom from chronic treatment failure. Chronic treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of either a documented episode of AF lasting 2 or more minutes (as measured by an implantable loop recorder) or an intervention for AF.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural MeasuresProcedureElapsed fluoroscopy time and cryocatheter procedure time between study arms. Renal Denervation Procedure Time and Total Procedural Time will be reported only for the Cryoablation and Renal Denervation group.
Proportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study Arms6 monthsThe endpoints for this objective are presence of the following arrhythmic symptoms as recorded at the 6-month visit through discussion with the patient at the time of the visit: * Dizziness * Palpitations * Rapid heart beat * Dyspnea * Fatigue * Syncope * Other
Change in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From Baseline6 monthsCompare the difference of office systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 6 months and baseline between study arms.
Percent of Time in AF Burden Over All Follow-up Occurring After the Blanking Period91 days after the cryoablation procedure date until the last Reveal LINQ device data date.Compare the Percent of time in AF burden over all follow-up occurring after the blanking period between study arms.
Rate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.6 monthsCompare the rate of chronic treatment success (primary effectiveness endpoint) between study arms for subjects off of Class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs following the blanking period.
Difference in Heart Rate at 6 Months and Baseline6 monthsCompare the difference in heart rate using the 6 month follow-up measurement and baseline visit measurement. These values will then be compared between study arms.

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first subject was enrolled on February 6, 2015 and the last subject was enrolled on September 9, 2020

Pre-assignment details

28 subjects were exited prior to randomization for not meeting study eligibility criteria. Of the 74 randomized subjects, 3 in the PVI+RDN group were not treated and 1 in the Control group (PVI only) were not treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cryoablation Only
Pulmonary vein isolation Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac Cryoablation System
36
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve Denervation
Pulmonary vein isolation plus renal nerve denervation Symplicity Spyral™ Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation Catheter Arctic Front Advance™ Cardiac Cryoablation System
34
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCryoablation OnlyCryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationTotal
Age, Continuous65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reportable per local laws or regulations
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Subject/Physician Chose Not to Provide Information
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
27 Participants28 Participants55 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
8 participants10 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants24 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants16 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 360 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 3624 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 3620 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients With Chronic Treatment Success

Chronic treatment success is freedom from chronic treatment failure. Chronic treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of either a documented episode of AF lasting 2 or more minutes (as measured by an implantable loop recorder) or an intervention for AF.

Time frame: Minimum of six months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Patients With Chronic Treatment Success11 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Patients With Chronic Treatment Success10 Participants
p-value: 0.7348Log Rank
Primary

Proportion of Subjects in Each Arm That Experience Safety Composite Events

Characterize the rate of safety composite events, (End stage renal disease, Death, Significant Embolic Event, Renal Artery Perforation or Dissection Requiring Intervention, Vascular Complications, Hospitalization for Hypertensive Crisis, New Renal Artery Stenosis, Cardiac Damage, Pulmonary Vein Stenosis, Atrio-Esophageal Fistula, Arrhythmia, Persistent Phrenic Nerve Palsy), within each of the two study arms and also characterize the difference in the rates between study arms. Each event in the composite has its own time frame, either one month or six months post procedure.

Time frame: Up to one or six months post procedure depending on the event

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Subjects in Each Arm That Experience Safety Composite Events1 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Subjects in Each Arm That Experience Safety Composite Events3 Participants
p-value: 0.28Log Rank
Secondary

Change in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From Baseline

Compare the difference of office systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 6 months and baseline between study arms.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cryoablation OnlyChange in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From BaselineOffice Systolic BP-11.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.7
Cryoablation OnlyChange in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From BaselineOffice Diastolic BP-5.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.6
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationChange in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From BaselineOffice Systolic BP-13.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.8
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationChange in Office Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 6 Months From BaselineOffice Diastolic BP-5.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Difference in Heart Rate at 6 Months and Baseline

Compare the difference in heart rate using the 6 month follow-up measurement and baseline visit measurement. These values will then be compared between study arms.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cryoablation OnlyDifference in Heart Rate at 6 Months and Baseline-1.9 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 17.3
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationDifference in Heart Rate at 6 Months and Baseline1.8 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 16.5
Secondary

Percent of Time in AF Burden Over All Follow-up Occurring After the Blanking Period

Compare the Percent of time in AF burden over all follow-up occurring after the blanking period between study arms.

Time frame: 91 days after the cryoablation procedure date until the last Reveal LINQ device data date.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cryoablation OnlyPercent of Time in AF Burden Over All Follow-up Occurring After the Blanking Period2.78 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 5.96
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationPercent of Time in AF Burden Over All Follow-up Occurring After the Blanking Period1.75 Percent of timeStandard Deviation 5.35
Secondary

Procedural Measures

Elapsed fluoroscopy time and cryocatheter procedure time between study arms. Renal Denervation Procedure Time and Total Procedural Time will be reported only for the Cryoablation and Renal Denervation group.

Time frame: Procedure

Population: The analysis population for Renal Denervation Procedure and Total Procedure Time does not include participants from the Cryoablation only group since they did not receive the Renal Artery Denervation Procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cryoablation OnlyProcedural MeasuresElapsed Fluoroscopy time25.4 minutesStandard Deviation 18.9
Cryoablation OnlyProcedural MeasuresCryocatheter Procedure Time66.2 minutesStandard Deviation 25.6
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProcedural MeasuresElapsed Fluoroscopy time34 minutesStandard Deviation 19.8
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProcedural MeasuresCryocatheter Procedure Time68.3 minutesStandard Deviation 27.3
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProcedural MeasuresRenal Artery Denervation Procedure Time51.2 minutesStandard Deviation 16.4
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProcedural MeasuresTotal Procedure Time119.5 minutesStandard Deviation 35.3
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study Arms

The endpoints for this objective are presence of the following arrhythmic symptoms as recorded at the 6-month visit through discussion with the patient at the time of the visit: * Dizziness * Palpitations * Rapid heart beat * Dyspnea * Fatigue * Syncope * Other

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDizziness at Baseline17 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDizziness at 6 months6 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsPalpitations at Baseline29 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsPalpitations at 6 months11 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsRapid Heart Beat at Baseline19 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsRapid Heart Beat at 6 months4 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDyspnea at Baseline25 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDyspnea at 6 months6 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsFatigue at Baseline16 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsFatigue at 6 months6 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsSyncope at Baseline1 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsSyncope at 6 months0 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsOther at Baseline13 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsOther at 6 months2 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsSyncope at Baseline1 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDizziness at Baseline11 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDyspnea at 6 months7 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDizziness at 6 months4 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsOther at Baseline10 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsPalpitations at Baseline27 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsFatigue at Baseline20 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsPalpitations at 6 months9 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsSyncope at 6 months0 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsRapid Heart Beat at Baseline18 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsFatigue at 6 months8 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsRapid Heart Beat at 6 months6 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsOther at 6 months2 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationProportion of Participants With Symptoms at 6 Months Between Study ArmsDyspnea at Baseline21 Participants
Secondary

Rate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.

Compare the rate of chronic treatment success (primary effectiveness endpoint) between study arms for subjects off of Class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs following the blanking period.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: If a subject has not used Class I or III anti-arrhythmic drugs at all following the blanking period, all of their follow-up will be used for this analysis. If a subject has used either Class I or Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs after the blanking period, they will be excluded for this analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cryoablation OnlyRate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.Treatment Failure13 Participants
Cryoablation OnlyRate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.No Treatment Failure7 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationRate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.Treatment Failure16 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationRate of Chronic Treatment Success (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) for Subjects Off of Class I and III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs Following the Blanking Period.No Treatment Failure8 Participants
Post Hoc

Daily Atrial Arrhythmia Burden From Baseline to End of ILR Recording for Patients Who Had a Mean Burden of Greater Than or Equal to 1 Hour Per Day on the Days They Experienced Atrial Arrhythmia(s)

Calculate the daily atrial arrhythmia burden in hours from baseline to end of the ILR recording. The patients who had a mean burden of 1 or more hours per day on the days they experienced atrial arrhythmias are included in the analysis. From these patients, it is then determined the mean daily atrial arrhythmia burden between groups.

Time frame: Baseline till end of recording of implantable loop recorder

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cryoablation OnlyDaily Atrial Arrhythmia Burden From Baseline to End of ILR Recording for Patients Who Had a Mean Burden of Greater Than or Equal to 1 Hour Per Day on the Days They Experienced Atrial Arrhythmia(s)9.2 hoursStandard Deviation 6
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationDaily Atrial Arrhythmia Burden From Baseline to End of ILR Recording for Patients Who Had a Mean Burden of Greater Than or Equal to 1 Hour Per Day on the Days They Experienced Atrial Arrhythmia(s)4.1 hoursStandard Deviation 3.5
Post Hoc

Number of Patients Who Discontinued Class I/III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs

Compare the number of patients who discontinued Class I/III anti-arrhythmic drugs between groups

Time frame: Baseline till end of follow-up (varies per patient)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cryoablation OnlyNumber of Patients Who Discontinued Class I/III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs3 Participants
Cryoablation and Renal Nerve DenervationNumber of Patients Who Discontinued Class I/III Anti-arrhythmic Drugs9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026