Skip to content

Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02063672
Acronym
SFA ISR
Enrollment
82
Registered
2014-02-14
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Artery Stenosis, Femoral Artery Occlusion, Restenosis

Brief summary

To assess the safety and efficacy of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal artery (SFA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Interventions

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age 2. Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4 3. Significant (≥ 50%) restenosis of a previous bare (not covered and not drug-eluting) nitinol stent(s) in the femoropopliteal artery 4. Lesion measures between 4 and 18 cm 5. Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix 6. A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography 7. Successful crossing and predilatation of the target lesion with a guidewire 8. At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been (nor planned to be) revascularized 9. No other prior vascular or surgical interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Life expectancy of \<1 year 2. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study NOTE: Enrollment in another drug or device clinical trial during the follow up period is not allowed 3. History of stroke within 3 months 4. History of MI, thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of enrollment 5. Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of remote common femoral patch angioplasty separated by at least 2 cm from the target lesion 6. Target lesion involves a previously placed covered stent or drug-eluting stent 7. Grade 4 or 5 stent fracture (mal-aligned components or trans-axial spiral configuration) in the restenotic stent 8. Inability to take required study medications or allergy to contrast that cannot be adequately managed with pre- and post-procedure medication 9. Known inadequate distal outflow (\>50 % stenosis of distal popliteal and/or all three tibial vessels), or planned future treatment of vascular disease distal to the target lesion 10. Intended use of adjunctive treatment modalities (i.e. laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, stents, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year12 MonthsPrimary patency is defined as freedom from clinically driven target lesion restenosis (TLR) and from Binary Restenosis.
Percentage of Participants Without Primary Safety Events12 MonthsPrimary Safety Events include: All Cause Perioperative (≤30 day) Death, Index Limb Amputation, Index Limb Reintervention and Index Limb Related Death at 1 Year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Procedural SuccessDuring the Index Procedure (90 mins)Procedural Success is defined as attainment of ≤30% residual stenosis in the treatment area by independent core lab analysis without major adverse events (defined as occurrence of death, amputation of the target limb, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion) during the index procedure and through the hospital stay.
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months6 months and 12 monthsPrimary Patency is defined as Freedom from CEC-adjudicated Clinically-Driven TLR and from Core laboratory-adjudicated Binary Restenosis. Binary restenosis is based on threshold Doppler peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥ 2.5 (together with waveform analysis & color mosaic appearance) or based on angiographic ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (if angiography is performed although not required per protocol).
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months6 months and 12 monthsSecondary patency is defined as the absence of Binary Restenosis as adjudicated by the blinded, independent core laboratory, independent of whether or not patency is re-established via an endovascular procedure.
Percentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 months and 12 monthsClinically-driven TLR is defined as revascularization of the target vessel with evidence of target vessel diameter stenosis \>50% determined by duplex ultrasound or angiography and new distal ischemic signs (worsening ABI or worsening Rutherford Category associated with the target limb or due to clinical symptoms), OR revascularization of a target vessel with an in-lesion diameter stenosis of \>70% by angiography, in the absence of the previously mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.
Percentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 months and 12 monthsTLR is defined as any repeat revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical) of the original target lesion site.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline6 months and 12 monthsSustained clinical benefit is defined as an improvement in Rutherford Classification compared to baseline and freedom from target vessel revascularization. The Rutherford classification is a clinical means of describing peripheral artery disease along a seven-stage scale, with stage 0 representing asymptomatic presentation and stage 6 representing severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene. A decrease in units on the scale represents improvement in clinical symptoms.
Change of Rutherford Classification From Baseline6 months and 12 monthsThe Rutherford classification is a clinical means of describing peripheral artery disease along a seven-stage scale, with stage 0 representing asymptomatic presentation and stage 6 representing severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene. A decrease in units on the scale represents improvement in clinical symptoms.
Change of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline6 months and 12 monthsThe ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure at the ankle to the blood pressure in the upper arm (brachium).
Percentage of Participants With Device SuccessDuring the Index Procedure (90 mins)Device success is defined as, on a per device basis, the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the study device(s) as intended at the intended target lesion, without balloon rupture or inflation/deflation abnormalities and a successful withdrawal of the study system.
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline6 months and 12 MonthsEQ-5D is a standardized tool to assess patient-reported mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, or slight, moderate, severe, or extreme problems. Patients choose the appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions, which results in a 1-digit number for each dimension. The digits for the 5 dimensions are converted into a single EQ-5D™ index score based on a set of population-based preference weights. For the U.S. general population, possible EQ-5D™ index scores range from -0.11 (i.e., 33333) to 1.0 (i.e., 11111) on a scale where 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health. A downloadable scoring file is available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/rice/EQ5Dscore.htm. The EQ VAS records a patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labeled 'The best health you can imagine' (100) and 'The worst health you can imagine' (0). A higher VAS value indicates a higher quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Without Major Vascular Complications (≤30 Day)30 DaysFreedom from major vascular complications at 30 days follow-up
Percentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death1 month, 6 months, and 12 monthsMortality from any cause.
Percentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation1 month, 6 months, and 12 monthsMajor limb amputation is defined as amputation of the lower limb above the ankle.
Percentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation1 month, 6 months, and 12 monthsMinor limb amputation is defined as amputation of a part of the foot below the ankle.
Percentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)1 month, 6 months, and 12 monthsA TVR is defined as a repeat revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical) of a lesion in the target vessel.
Percentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions1 month, 6 months, and 12 monthsAny surgical intervention in the target limb.
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline6 months and 12 monthsThe Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a validated questionnaire that evaluates walking ability with a focus on walking distance, walking speed, and the ability to climb stairs. Participants answer each item on a Likert scale from 0 for unable to do to 4 for no difficulty, and each response is weighted based on the difficulty of the task. The overall score is determined by dividing the weighted answers by the maximum possible weighted score and multiplying by 100. The overall score ranges from 0-100 with lower scores indicating lower performance.
Percentage of Participants With Technical SuccessDuring the Index Procedure (90 mins)Technical success of the balloon procedure is defined as the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the study device(s) as intended at the intended target lesion and a successful withdrawal of the study system with the achievement of \< 30% residual percent stenosis without deployment of a bail-out stent.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lutonix DCB
Lutonix Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon Lutonix DCB
53
PTA Catheter
Standard Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty Catheter Standard Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty Catheter: PTA Catheter
29
Total82

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath53
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyOngoing Follow-up2714
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPTA CatheterTotalLutonix DCB
Age, Continuous67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.35
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants68 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants40 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants42 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 533 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 5313 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
44 / 5317 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Without Primary Safety Events

Primary Safety Events include: All Cause Perioperative (≤30 day) Death, Index Limb Amputation, Index Limb Reintervention and Index Limb Related Death at 1 Year

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All participants with 12-month evaluable data for the primary safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Primary Safety Events72.8 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Primary Safety Events64.0 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year

Primary patency is defined as freedom from clinically driven target lesion restenosis (TLR) and from Binary Restenosis.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All subjects who completed a 12-Month follow-up visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year67.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 1 Year49.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life From Baseline

EQ-5D is a standardized tool to assess patient-reported mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, or slight, moderate, severe, or extreme problems. Patients choose the appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions, which results in a 1-digit number for each dimension. The digits for the 5 dimensions are converted into a single EQ-5D™ index score based on a set of population-based preference weights. For the U.S. general population, possible EQ-5D™ index scores range from -0.11 (i.e., 33333) to 1.0 (i.e., 11111) on a scale where 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health. A downloadable scoring file is available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/rice/EQ5Dscore.htm. The EQ VAS records a patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labeled 'The best health you can imagine' (100) and 'The worst health you can imagine' (0). A higher VAS value indicates a higher quality of life.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 Months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutonix DCBChange in Quality of Life From Baseline6 Months - EQ5D Index0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Lutonix DCBChange in Quality of Life From Baseline12 Months - EQ5D Index0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Lutonix DCBChange in Quality of Life From Baseline6 Months - EQ5D VAS-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Lutonix DCBChange in Quality of Life From Baseline12 Months - EQ5D VAS2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
PTA CatheterChange in Quality of Life From Baseline12 Months - EQ5D VAS0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
PTA CatheterChange in Quality of Life From Baseline6 Months - EQ5D Index0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
PTA CatheterChange in Quality of Life From Baseline6 Months - EQ5D VAS0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
PTA CatheterChange in Quality of Life From Baseline12 Months - EQ5D Index0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline

The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a validated questionnaire that evaluates walking ability with a focus on walking distance, walking speed, and the ability to climb stairs. Participants answer each item on a Likert scale from 0 for unable to do to 4 for no difficulty, and each response is weighted based on the difficulty of the task. The overall score is determined by dividing the weighted answers by the maximum possible weighted score and multiplying by 100. The overall score ranges from 0-100 with lower scores indicating lower performance.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutonix DCBChange in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline6 Months14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Lutonix DCBChange in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline12 Months12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
PTA CatheterChange in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline6 Months16.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.3
PTA CatheterChange in Walking Impairment Questionnaire From Baseline12 Months12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Secondary

Change of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure at the ankle to the blood pressure in the upper arm (brachium).

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutonix DCBChange of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline6 Months0.20 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2
Lutonix DCBChange of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline12 Months0.16 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2
PTA CatheterChange of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline6 Months0.25 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
PTA CatheterChange of Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) From Baseline12 Months0.16 ratioStandard Deviation 0.24
Secondary

Change of Rutherford Classification From Baseline

The Rutherford classification is a clinical means of describing peripheral artery disease along a seven-stage scale, with stage 0 representing asymptomatic presentation and stage 6 representing severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene. A decrease in units on the scale represents improvement in clinical symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All patients with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lutonix DCBChange of Rutherford Classification From Baseline6 Months-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Lutonix DCBChange of Rutherford Classification From Baseline12 Months-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
PTA CatheterChange of Rutherford Classification From Baseline6 Months-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
PTA CatheterChange of Rutherford Classification From Baseline12 Months-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Device Success

Device success is defined as, on a per device basis, the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the study device(s) as intended at the intended target lesion, without balloon rupture or inflation/deflation abnormalities and a successful withdrawal of the study system.

Time frame: During the Index Procedure (90 mins)

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Device Success98.1 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Device Success100 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death

Mortality from any cause.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death6 Months100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death12 Months100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death6 Months96.4 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without All-Cause Death12 Months96.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions

Any surgical intervention in the target limb.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions1 Month96.2 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions6 Month88.5 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions12 Month72.8 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions6 Month92.7 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Any Target Limb Reinterventions12 Month64.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Clinically-driven TLR is defined as revascularization of the target vessel with evidence of target vessel diameter stenosis \>50% determined by duplex ultrasound or angiography and new distal ischemic signs (worsening ABI or worsening Rutherford Category associated with the target limb or due to clinical symptoms), OR revascularization of a target vessel with an in-lesion diameter stenosis of \>70% by angiography, in the absence of the previously mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 Months94.3 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)12 Months78.6 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 Months96.4 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)12 Months64.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation

Major limb amputation is defined as amputation of the lower limb above the ankle.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation6 Months100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation12 Months100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation6 Months100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Major Limb Amputation12 Months100 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Major Vascular Complications (≤30 Day)

Freedom from major vascular complications at 30 days follow-up

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Major Vascular Complications (≤30 Day)98.1 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Major Vascular Complications (≤30 Day)92.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation

Minor limb amputation is defined as amputation of a part of the foot below the ankle.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation6 Months100 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation12 Months100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation6 Months96.4 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Minor Limb Amputation12 Months96.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

TLR is defined as any repeat revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical) of the original target lesion site.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 Months94.3 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)12 Months78.6 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)6 Months92.7 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)12 Months64.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)

A TVR is defined as a repeat revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical) of a lesion in the target vessel.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)1 Month96.2 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)6 Months90.5 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)12 Months76.7 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)1 Month100 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)6 Months92.7 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants Without Target Vessel Revascularizations (TVR)12 Months64.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months

Primary Patency is defined as Freedom from CEC-adjudicated Clinically-Driven TLR and from Core laboratory-adjudicated Binary Restenosis. Binary restenosis is based on threshold Doppler peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥ 2.5 (together with waveform analysis & color mosaic appearance) or based on angiographic ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (if angiography is performed although not required per protocol).

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months6 Months92.1 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months12 Months67.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months6 Months77.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Primary Patency at 6 and 12 Months12 Months37.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success

Procedural Success is defined as attainment of ≤30% residual stenosis in the treatment area by independent core lab analysis without major adverse events (defined as occurrence of death, amputation of the target limb, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion) during the index procedure and through the hospital stay.

Time frame: During the Index Procedure (90 mins)

Population: All participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success70.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success77.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months

Secondary patency is defined as the absence of Binary Restenosis as adjudicated by the blinded, independent core laboratory, independent of whether or not patency is re-established via an endovascular procedure.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months90.9 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months74.2 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months60.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Secondary Patency at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months80.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline

Sustained clinical benefit is defined as an improvement in Rutherford Classification compared to baseline and freedom from target vessel revascularization. The Rutherford classification is a clinical means of describing peripheral artery disease along a seven-stage scale, with stage 0 representing asymptomatic presentation and stage 6 representing severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene. A decrease in units on the scale represents improvement in clinical symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months and 12 months

Population: All participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline6 Months69.4 Percentage of Participants
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline12 Months61.2 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline6 Months59.1 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Benefit Compared to Baseline12 Months50.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Technical Success

Technical success of the balloon procedure is defined as the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the study device(s) as intended at the intended target lesion and a successful withdrawal of the study system with the achievement of \< 30% residual percent stenosis without deployment of a bail-out stent.

Time frame: During the Index Procedure (90 mins)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lutonix DCBPercentage of Participants With Technical Success66.0 Percentage of Participants
PTA CatheterPercentage of Participants With Technical Success77.8 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026