Skip to content

Measurement of Cardiac Index Using an Implanted Central Venous Access Port in Patients Scheduled for Oncologic High-risk Surgery

Measurement of Cardiac Index by Transpulmonary Thermodilution Using an Implanted Central Venous Access Port: a Prospective Study in Patients Scheduled for Oncologic High-risk Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02063009
Acronym
ThermoD-PAC
Enrollment
33
Registered
2014-02-14
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2014-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oncologic High-risk Surgery

Brief summary

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization requires monitoring adapted to the risks of the surgery and the patient. We currently use a local hemodynamic protocol based on the data of the literature. According to this protocol, specific patients may require cardiac index and central venous oxygen saturation monitoring. We chose to monitor the cardiac index (CI) with the transpulmonary thermodilution technique (TPTD) (PiCCO, Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Germany). The technique is based on the injection of a cooled bolus of saline into a central vein with a central venous catheter (CVC). The variation of temperature is measured with an arterial femoral catheter and allows the assessment of the cardiac output according to Stewart-Hamilton's theory. Many studies showed the reliability of this technique. In our institute, most of the patients are fitted with a port for chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition. When PiCCO monitoring is necessary, a central venous catheter is inserted on the opposite side of the permanent implantable venous port. Indeed, insertion of the CVC can be more difficult because of the port. It may be interesting to use the port for TPTD in order to avoid the insertion of a new CVC. This would be possible only if the measurement of CI by the port was as reliable as the classical measurement with a CVC.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to assess whether measurement of the CI by TPTD was possible and reliable via the port. We conducted a prospective study comparing the measurement of the CI by TPTD before and after fluid challenge via the port versus the CVC.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* presence of port * scheduled surgery with perioperative optimization requirement according to the local hemodynamic protocol * oral consent of the patient after oral and written information

Exclusion criteria

* age inferior to 18 * Contraindication or failure to the insertion of the CVC * Contraindication to the use of the port : local or general infection suspected or proved, absence of blood backflow

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimation of the reliability of the measurement of the variations of the CI during fluid challengemeasurement of the CI hourly, up to 3 hours by TPTD before and after fluid challenge via the port versus the CVC.Measurements will be realized as described: * hourly: TPTD will be realized to calibrate the measurement of CI * Before and after fluid challenge (250 ml of colloid when hemodynamic indicators will be in favour of hypovolemia (pulse pressure variation (PPV) \> 15% and variation of CI \> 10%)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026