Skip to content

MESA Rail™ AIS Study - Preservation of Curve Correction

Preservation of Thoracic Kyphosis and Coronal Curve Correction as a Function of Rod Stiffness in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) With the Use of the K2M MESA Rail™ Deformity System

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02062606
Enrollment
188
Registered
2014-02-13
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2020-02-23
Last updated
2021-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Keywords

Scoliosis, Spinal Curvatures, Spinal Diseases, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Spinal Deformity

Brief summary

To evaluate the restoration and maintenance of thoracic kyphosis and coronal curve correction demonstrated through the surgical implantation of the K2M MESA Rail™ Deformity System as compared to literature reported outcomes for standard Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) rod systems in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

Detailed description

Patients treated with the Ø5.5mm or Ø4.5mm MESA Rail™ Deformity System that had: Diagnosis of AIS requiring surgical treatment for selective non-cervical fusion with a minimum of five (5) instrumented vertebrae between T1-S1 as confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. AIS cases must be classified as a Lenke type 1 or type 2 curve (lumbar modifiers and thoracic sagittal profiles will be noted but not restrictive). Age at time of surgery of ≥ 11 years old and ≤ 21 years old.

Interventions

DEVICEMESA Rail™ Deformity System

MESA Rail™ (cross-sectioned rod) with MESA pedicle screws compared to traditional rod use in the literature

Sponsors

K2M, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of AIS requiring surgical treatment for selective thoracic/lumbar fusion with a minimum of five (5) instrumented vertebrae between T1-S1 as confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. AIS cases must be classified as a Lenke type 1 or type 2 curve. No cervical vertebrae are to be incorporated into the construct. * Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements. * Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form or, in the case of a patient who is a minor, provide assent and the minor patient's parent/legal guardian provides written consent to participate. * Age range of ≥ 11 years old and ≤ 21 years old at time of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous anterior or posterior spine surgery at the index levels. * Previous posterior spine surgery (e.g., posterior element decompression) that destabilizes the cervical/thoracic/lumbar spine. * Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site. * Co-morbid medical conditions of the spine or upper/lower extremities that may affect the thoracic or lumbar spine neurological and/or pain assessment. * Metabolic bone disease such as osteoporosis that contradicts spinal surgery. * History of an osteoporotic fracture. * History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder (e.g., Paget's disease) known to affect bone and mineral metabolism. * Taking medications that may interfere with bony/soft tissue healing including chronic steroid use. * Known allergy to titanium or cobalt chrome. * Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease or a systemic disorder such as HIV, active hepatitis B or C or fibromyalgia. * Insulin-dependent type 1 or type 2 diabetes. * Medical condition (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, cancer) that may result in patient death or have an effect on outcomes prior to study completion. * Pregnant, or intend to become pregnant, during the course of the study. * Severe obesity (Body Mass Index \> 40).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Thoracic Kyphosis and Coronal Curve Correction on X-ray at 24 MonthsBaseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 monthsRestoration and maintenance of thoracic kyphosis and coronal curve correction. Thoracic kyphosis (Coronal Curve): measurement of curvature from the upper endplate of T4 to the lower endplate of T12.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to 24 monthsNumber of participants with SAE and AE for the various intervals

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction12 months and 24 monthsAt the 12 month and 24 month follow-up visits, subjects were asked whether they were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery (Yes/No) and whether they would repeat the operation (Yes/No).
Investigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's Criteria24 monthsAt the 24 month follow-up visit, the Investigator rated the clinical disposition of each study subject according to Odom's Criteria as follows: Excellent: all pre-operative symptoms relieved, able to carry out daily occupations without impairment. Good: minimum persistence of pre-operative symptoms, able to carry out daily occupations without significant interference. Fair/Satisfactory: relief of some pre-operative symptoms but physical activity is significantly limited. Poor: symptoms or signs unchanged or worsened.
Length of Surgery TimeDuring surgeryThe length of the surgical procedure from the initial incision to final closure were captured.
Length of Anesthesia TimeDuring surgeryThe length of time the patient is under anesthesia was captured.
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 MonthsBaseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 monthsEvaluation of the improvement of the Back VAS and Hip/Leg VAS (assessed together) at the 24 month post-operative visit as compared to pre-op time periods. Information on all reports of pain/numbness /tingling and the location of symptoms were captured and evaluated. VAS scale ranged from 0 - 100mm with the 100mm accounting for the highest level of pain.
Length of Hospital StayAdmission to DischargeThe length of the hospital stay from the date of admission to the date of discharge.
Change in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolPre-Op to 24 monthsThe ability to and the time it takes for the subject to be cleared to return to work/school from the date of surgery by looking at the change in percentage of participants who were able to return to work without any restrictions
Use of Narcotics Post-surgeryPre-Op to 24 monthsThe types and dosages of any narcotics taken by the patient pre- and post-surgery was documented.
Estimated Blood LossDuring surgeryThe amount of blood loss over the entire length of the surgery was captured.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Scores on the SRS-22r at 24 MonthsBaseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 monthsThe Revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) is a specific questionnaire for spine conditions. It is applied to patients with idiopathic scoliosis, whose conditions and treatments have a great impact on their quality of life. The SRS 22r was created and revised with the purpose of evaluating this impact from the patient's point of view. The reviewed version contains 22 questions distributed into five domains: function/activity (FA), pain (P), self- image/appearance (SA), mental health (MH) and satisfaction with treatment (ST). The scores vary from 1 to 5 in which 5 is the best health quality of life of patients.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
This is a demographic and baseline characteristics of the patient population. This includes parameters such as Age, Gender, Height, Weight Body Mass Index (BMI) and Tobacco Usage.
188
Total188

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDemographics and Baseline Characteristics
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
180 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous14.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16
Body Mass Index (BMI)21.43 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.66
Height160.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
170 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
139 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants
Tobacco Use
Currently Use
1 Participants
Tobacco Use
Never
186 Participants
Tobacco Use
Quit
1 Participants
Weight55.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.53

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 188
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 188
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 188

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Thoracic Kyphosis and Coronal Curve Correction on X-ray at 24 Months

Restoration and maintenance of thoracic kyphosis and coronal curve correction. Thoracic kyphosis (Coronal Curve): measurement of curvature from the upper endplate of T4 to the lower endplate of T12.

Time frame: Baseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 months

Population: 98 of the 99 participants who returned at 24 Months had the thoracic kyphosis measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
All PatientsChange From Baseline in Thoracic Kyphosis and Coronal Curve Correction on X-ray at 24 Months-3.84 degrees
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants with SAE and AE for the various intervals

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: This is an analysis of the number of participants that reported any form of adverse event. Overall participants with any AE or SAE. 5 of the 17 SAE participants did not experience a non-SAE events. The other 12 participants had events in both categories. The study did not establish a frequency threshold, therefore, all AEs are listed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related44 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe4 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild3 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate4 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE10 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild44 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate19 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe5 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE62 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related2 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related16 participants
All PatientsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related8 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe1 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild6 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE7 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate1 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE1 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related0 participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe1 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate4 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related12 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild17 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE21 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe0 participants
3 to 6 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related3 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate5 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild20 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe1 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE4 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe1 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate2 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE25 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related9 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related6 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related1 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related1 participants
6 to 12 MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild1 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related7 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE3 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild1 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild29 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related2 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe0 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe0 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate10 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related18 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related2 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate2 participants
12 to 24+ MonthsNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE36 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE17 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Device Related26 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Mild5 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Severe6 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Procedure Related11 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Moderate7 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Severe7 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Moderate31 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny SAE : Device Related5 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Mild79 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE : Procedure Related67 participants
OverallNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny AE98 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Months

Evaluation of the improvement of the Back VAS and Hip/Leg VAS (assessed together) at the 24 month post-operative visit as compared to pre-op time periods. Information on all reports of pain/numbness /tingling and the location of symptoms were captured and evaluated. VAS scale ranged from 0 - 100mm with the 100mm accounting for the highest level of pain.

Time frame: Baseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 months

Population: 13 out of the 99 participants who returned at 24 months, did not complete the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Months-16.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.5
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Months-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
3 to 6 MonthsChange From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Months-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Scores on the SRS-22r at 24 Months

The Revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) is a specific questionnaire for spine conditions. It is applied to patients with idiopathic scoliosis, whose conditions and treatments have a great impact on their quality of life. The SRS 22r was created and revised with the purpose of evaluating this impact from the patient's point of view. The reviewed version contains 22 questions distributed into five domains: function/activity (FA), pain (P), self- image/appearance (SA), mental health (MH) and satisfaction with treatment (ST). The scores vary from 1 to 5 in which 5 is the best health quality of life of patients.

Time frame: Baseline (up to 90 days before surgery), 24 months

Population: While 99 participants completed 24 month interval, 14 patients out of the 99 did not did not complete the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Scores on the SRS-22r at 24 Months0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/School

The ability to and the time it takes for the subject to be cleared to return to work/school from the date of surgery by looking at the change in percentage of participants who were able to return to work without any restrictions

Time frame: Pre-Op to 24 months

Population: Includes all participants who returned for each visit interval with those who did not respond to this question accounted for in the missing row.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions0 Participants
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions5 Participants
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions172 Participants
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice11 Participants
All PatientsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice22 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions57 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions19 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions83 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions44 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing1 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice7 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions4 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions104 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice2 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions44 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions101 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions14 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions117 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing1 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice3 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolMissing2 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnemployed, unrelated to back/leg conditions0 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolNot attending work/school by choice0 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with no restrictions93 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolAttending work/school with some restrictions4 Participants
OverallChange in Percentage of Participants Able to Return to Work/SchoolUnable to go due to back/leg pain/conditions0 Participants
Secondary

Estimated Blood Loss

The amount of blood loss over the entire length of the surgery was captured.

Time frame: During surgery

Population: 187 patients had blood loss included. There were 3 additional procedures staged increasing the overall number of units analyzed to 190.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsEstimated Blood Loss672.34 Cubic CentimetersStandard Deviation 588.14
Secondary

Investigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's Criteria

At the 24 month follow-up visit, the Investigator rated the clinical disposition of each study subject according to Odom's Criteria as follows: Excellent: all pre-operative symptoms relieved, able to carry out daily occupations without impairment. Good: minimum persistence of pre-operative symptoms, able to carry out daily occupations without significant interference. Fair/Satisfactory: relief of some pre-operative symptoms but physical activity is significantly limited. Poor: symptoms or signs unchanged or worsened.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Patients who were rated based on the outcome of their treatment and would indicate either Excellent, Good or Fair/Satisfactory. No responses are shown under missing

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All PatientsInvestigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's CriteriaFair/Satisfactory2 Participants
All PatientsInvestigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's CriteriaGood15 Participants
All PatientsInvestigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's CriteriaExcellent78 Participants
All PatientsInvestigator's Rating of Subject's Clinical Disposition Using Odom's CriteriaMissing4 Participants
Secondary

Length of Anesthesia Time

The length of time the patient is under anesthesia was captured.

Time frame: During surgery

Population: 183 subjects had anesthesia time included. There were 3 staged procedures increasing the overall number of units analyzed to 186.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsLength of Anesthesia Time373.67 MinutesStandard Deviation 91.97
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

The length of the hospital stay from the date of admission to the date of discharge.

Time frame: Admission to Discharge

Population: 186 patients completed admit and discharge dates

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsLength of Hospital Stay5.28 DaysStandard Deviation 1.79
Secondary

Length of Surgery Time

The length of the surgical procedure from the initial incision to final closure were captured.

Time frame: During surgery

Population: 186 patients had their surgery times recorded. There were 3 additional procedures staged increasing the overall number of units analyzed to 189.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All PatientsLength of Surgery Time267.01 MinutesStandard Deviation 79.89
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

At the 12 month and 24 month follow-up visits, subjects were asked whether they were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery (Yes/No) and whether they would repeat the operation (Yes/No).

Time frame: 12 months and 24 months

Population: Patient self-assessment of the procedure at 12M and 24M

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureNot Reported7 Participants
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedNo4 Participants
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureNo23 Participants
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedNot Reported7 Participants
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedYes124 Participants
All PatientsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureYes105 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedYes86 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureNo12 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureNot Reported11 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionRepeat ProcedureYes76 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedNo2 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsPatient SatisfactionSatisfiedNot Reported11 Participants
Secondary

Use of Narcotics Post-surgery

The types and dosages of any narcotics taken by the patient pre- and post-surgery was documented.

Time frame: Pre-Op to 24 months

Population: Includes all participants who returned for each visit interval with those who did not respond to this question accounted for in the missing row.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS53 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics1 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone157 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone128 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing0 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS31 Participants
All PatientsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics6 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics7 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics18 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics1 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone46 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics6 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics6 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics77 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS28 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing0 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone151 Participants
Post-Operative to 3 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS22 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing1 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS29 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics2 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone141 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics9 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone118 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS18 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing1 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics1 Participants
3 to 6 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS28 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics5 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS22 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone125 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone114 Participants
6 to 12 MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics1 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone112 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS22 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone118 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS17 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
12 to 24+ MonthsUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS13 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsNone84 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics1 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsMissing4 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNon-narcotics or NSAIDS16 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsNone78 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsMissing2 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsEpidural/Facet injection0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsIV or injected narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryBack MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily long-acting narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsChronic daily short-acting narcotics0 Participants
OverallUse of Narcotics Post-surgeryNon-Back MedsIntermittent short-acting narcotics0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026