The Efficacy of Analgesic Methods After Caesarean Section
Conditions
Keywords
Acute Pain Service, postoperative analgesia, Caesarean Section, non-opioid analgesia, opioid analgesia, epidural analgesia
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of analgesic methods after Caesarean Section before and after Post Caesarean Acute Pain Service establishing.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Caesarean Section performed from October 2009 to October 2011 (study period) * completed Evaluation of postoperative analgesia after Caesarean Section form.
Exclusion criteria
* Not completed Standard Evaluation of postoperative analgesia after Caesarean Section form.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | 72 hours after Caesarean Section (CS) | Comparison of pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) during the postoperative period (72 hours) between the two groups according to postoperative analgesic method and method of anaesthesia. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| VAS score above 4 | 72 hours after CS | unsatisfactory pain relief |
| Additional Analgesic Requests (AAR) Count | 72 hours after CS | Comparison of the average value of the AARs count in groups in the first 72 hours after CS |
| Analgesia related complication Rate | 72 hours after CS | Analgesia related complications including hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypoventilation were recorded. |
Countries
Czechia