Skip to content

Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated Disorder

Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated disorder-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02060734
Enrollment
0
Registered
2014-02-12
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Whiplash Injuries

Keywords

Whiplash,, injection,, lidocaine,, sham needling

Brief summary

To determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury.

Detailed description

This is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury. Outcomes include pain, objective assessment, self-report function recovery, impact on work performance and globe perceived effects which will be assessed 5 minutes, 2 and 6 weeks following injection.

Interventions

PROCEDURELidocaine

Lidocaine injection 3-5 points in experimental group( using 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with 1% lidocaine inserting into the site of the trigger point).

OTHERSaline

The control group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with saline inserting to subcutis.

Sponsors

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* fulfill the Grade II Quebec Task Force classification of WAD, * with identifiable myofascial trigger points ( which occur with or without a taut band), * reproduction of recognizable pain with sustained pressure ( up to 10 seconds) on trigger points * aged 18 to 70 * a good understanding of informed consent and willing to attend this trial.

Exclusion criteria

* have serious injury such as fracture and internal bleeding * suspicion of upper cervical instability or neurological deficits * clinical evidence of radiculopathy * a history of active cancer, central nerve disorder, blood clotting disorders, needle phobia * anticoagulant medication user * previous experience with any type of needling for myofascial pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain2 weeks following injection10 cm Visual Analog Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cervical range of motionImmediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
self-report neck disabilityImmediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
globe perceived effectsImmediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injectionThe Short Form-12
work performanceImmediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injectionquestionnaire
pain5 minutes following injection10 cm Visual Analog Scale

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026