Pulmonary Embolism
Conditions
Keywords
pulmonary embolism, magnetic resonance imaging, venous ultrasonography of the legs, diagnostic performances
Brief summary
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a promising technique but can not be used as an alternative test to multidetector CT in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) due to its low sensitivity and high proportion of inconclusive MRI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate diagnostic performances of MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs in patients with suspicion of PE.
Interventions
PROCEDUREMRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs
In case of positive D-dimer testing or in patients with a high probability of PE, MRI and a venous ultrasonography of the legs are done.MRI protocol includes 2 sequences: 1-Unenhanced steady-state-free precession sequences (SSFP) are acquired first without ECG-gating or breath-holding in the axial plane in the multiphase cine mode, with 6 phases per location.The acquisition is repeated to cover 2-3 of the thorax, from the roof of the aorta to the diaphragm. 2- A pulmonary gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence is performed in the axial plane.The acquisition is triggered to start when contrast enhancement occurred in the right ventricle.Two acquisitions are necessary to cover the anatomy. For each acquisition, 0.15 mL kg-1 body weight of DOTAREM Gadolinium is injected at a rate of 3 mL s-1 followed by an injection of 15 mL of normal saline at 3 mL s-1.Venous ultrasonography of the legs: the examination consists of a real-time B-mode examination of the common femoral and popliteal veins.
Sponsors
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
: * age \> or = 18 years * clinical suspicion of PE * Affiliate (e) to a social security * provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
: * Unstable patient clinically in shock on arrival at the emergency department * Current pregnancy * Life expectancy less than 3 months (eg terminal cancer) * Follow up at 3 months impossible * Anticoagulation curative\> 48 hours prior to inclusion * Cons-indication to spiral chest CT: allergy to contrast or creatinine clearance below 30 ml / min calculated by the Cockcroft * Cons-indication to MRI claustrophobia, presence of intraocular metallic implant or a pacemaker, an allergy to gadolinium, morbid obesity (weight\> 130 kg, anteroposterior\> 60 cm diameter)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To assess diagnostic performances of MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up | 51 months | sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of the combination of MRI and venous ultrasonography of the legs |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a strategy combining clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, MRI and venous ultrasonography of the legs for PE | 51 months | 3-month thromboembolic events rate in patients who were left untreated on the basis of negative D-dimer measurement or negative combination of MRI + venous ultrasonography of the legs |
| To assess diagnostic performances of each MRI sequence combined or not to venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up | 51 months | sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of each MRI sequence (unenhanced 2D steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) and contrast-enhanced 3D angiographic MR sequences) combined or not to venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up |
| inter-reader agreement for MRI | 51 months | Kappa coefficient of concordance calculated on the diagnoses on MRI by two radiologists blinded to the diagnostic reference strategy (multidetector CT angiography and follow-up 3 months). |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed