Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of T-2345 Compared to Xalatan in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

A Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Observer-Masked, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of T-2345 Ophthalmic Solution to Xalatan (Latanoprost 0.005%) in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02059278
Enrollment
335
Registered
2014-02-11
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Keywords

Primary open angle glaucoma, Ocular hypertension

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of T-2345 dosed to one of both eyes once daily for 84 days compared to Xalatan dosed to one of both eyes once daily for 84 days in patients with elevated eye pressure.

Detailed description

The objective of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of T-2345 nonpreserved ophthalmic solution (latanoprost 0.005%) in comparison to Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005%) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). This will be a randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, observer-masked study in approximately 380 evaluable subjects treated for 84 days. Subjects will have a history of POAG or OH and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and will have been adequately controlled (IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg) on latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution monotherapy for at least 4 weeks. Primary efficacy (IOP) will be assessed in the study eye at each visit by Goldmann applanation tonometry at all assessment visits. Safety will be assessed at each visit by corrected Snellen Visual Acuity, slit lamp examination/anterior chamber cell count and flare and adverse event (AE) collection. Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the between-group comparison of the mean IOP values at each time point at each of the Day 15, 42, and 84 visits. Secondary Efficacy Endpoints include: * Between-group comparison of the mean change from baseline in diurnal IOP measurements at all postbaseline visits. * Between-group comparison of the mean change from baseline in IOP measurements at all times points at Day 15, Day 42 and Day 84.

Interventions

DRUGT-2345

T-2345 Ophthalmic Solution

Xalatan (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution)

Sponsors

Nephron Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years or older. 2. POAG or OH with IOP treated and adequately controlled (IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg) with latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution monotherapy for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. 3. Each eye being treated with latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution monotherapy must have mean IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg at Screening and mean IOP ≤ 28 mm Hg at Baseline; measurements will be taken at each visit at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM (each ± 30 minutes) with AM measurements of IOP at least 2 hours apart. If only one eye qualifies but both eyes have glaucoma and the fellow eye will require antiglaucoma medications, the subject does not qualify for the trial. 4. Stable visual field (VF), defined as no sign of VF degradation between two consecutive 30-2 or two consecutive 24-2 VF examinations. For subjects with no VF defect (eg, those with OH), a single, normal VF examination performed ˂ 6 months prior to the screening visit is allowed to determine eligibility. For patients who have an abnormal VF examination, the following criteria apply: * Two VF (most recent VF and past VF) examinations performed at least ≥ 6 months and ≤ 18 months apart must be compared; * The most recent VF examination should be performed \< 6 months prior to the Screening visit; * The past VF examination should be performed ≥ 6 months and ≤ 18 months prior to the most recent VF test. 5. Stable corrected Snellen visual acuity (VA) of better than 20/200 in the study eye. Patients must see ≥ 50% of the letters on a single line to accept that VA line. 6. Central corneal thickness 480-620 μm in the study eye. 7. Shaffer gonioscopic grade of ≥ 3 (in at least 3 quadrants) in both eyes. 8. Female subjects must be 1-year postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or women of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening. Women of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of contraception throughout the study. Acceptable methods include the use of at least one of the following: intrauterine (intrauterine device), hormonal (oral, injection, patch, implant, ring), barrier with spermicide (condom, diaphragm), or abstinence. 9. All subjects must provide signed written consent prior to participation in any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

In the study eye: 1. A mean deviation of \< -20 dB on VF examination. 2. A mean IOP ˃ 28 mm Hg at Baseline. 3. Presence of a scotoma within 5° of fixation on VF examination. 4. Aphakia. 5. Use of any antiglaucoma medication in addition to latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution within 2 weeks prior to Screening and any antiglaucoma medication (other than latanoprost) during the study period other than the randomized study medication. 6. Use of any topical ophthalmic steroid within 2 weeks prior to Baseline. A short course of oral steroids is acceptable if the course is completed \> 2 weeks prior to Screening. Inhaled and intranasal steroids are acceptable. 7. Use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 2 weeks prior to Baseline. 8. Use of any ophthalmic medications during the study period (nonpreserved artificial tears are allowed). 9. Ocular surgery or laser treatment of any kind in the study eye within 3 months prior to Baseline. 10. History of ocular allergy/inflammation and/or severe blepharitis and/or uveitis. Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis is acceptable (avoid enrollment of subjects who may experience seasonal flare-up during the study period). Mild blepharitis/blepharoconjunctivitis, typically associated with prostaglandin usage, on the lid is acceptable. 11. History of ocular trauma or ocular infection within 3 months of Screening. 12. History of herpes simplex keratitis. 13. Current proliferative diabetic retinopathy or age-related macular degeneration, unless deemed not clinically significant by the Investigator. 14. Severe dry eye (eg, clinically relevant superficial punctate keratitis, epithelial erosions of the cornea, and/or use of dry eye medication \[including artificial tears\] with a frequency exceeding 8 instillations per day). 15. Contact lens wear during the study period. Contact lens wear in an untreated fellow eye is allowed. 16. Any secondary glaucoma or OH (eg, congenital glaucoma, closed-angle glaucoma, uveitic glaucoma, or pseudoexfoliation syndrome). 17. Any severe glaucoma defined by cupping (cup-to-disc ratio ≥ 0.8). 18. Any non-laser glaucoma surgery. 19. Any abnormality preventing accurate assessment (eg, resulting in unreliable applanation tonometry or VF examination). General: 20. Pregnancy or lactation. 21. Uncontrolled asthma (defined as asthma that does not respond to the maximum guideline-directed therapy). 22. Allergy to benzalkonium chloride. 23. History of moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment. 24. Participation in any study of an investigational product within 30 days prior to Screening or at any time during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular PressureMeasured at 8am 10 am and 4 pm at Baseline and on Days 15, 42 and 84Evaluation of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Primary outcome was the between group difference in the change from baseline in IOP at each of 9 assessment points. Equivalence was achieved if the 95% Confidence Intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at all 9 time points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual AcuityBaseline and 84 daysVisual Acuity was measured using the Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity method reported as the Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resoution (logMAR) change from baseline. The Snellen eye chart was used with the subject's current corrected lens prescription at a distance equivalent to 20 feet. Results from the Snellen chart were converted to the logMAR scale which is the standard tool for reporting visual acuity outcomes.
Slit Lamp ExaminationBaseline and 84 daysNumber of participants with eye abnormalities following routine slit lamp examination. The anterior segment of the eye including lids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, iris and lens were evaluated with a routine slit lamp examination and any abnormalities observed were reported.
OphthalmoscopyBaseline and 84 daysNumber of participants with eye abnormalities following ophthalmoscopy. Direct ophthalmoscopy with dilation included assessment of the optic nerve head for pallor and cupping. A dilated fundus examination consisting of the vitreous, optic nerve, macula, and peripheral retina was conducted. Results are reported as the number of subjects with clinical significant abnormalities at Day 84 that were not clinically significant at Baseline.
Mean Deviation in Visual FieldBaseline and 84 daysVisual Field was performed using an automated perimeter according to the sites standard protocol. This test measures the angle of the visual field from the central visual axis. Visual Field Testing generates a numerical scale as its main result which shows the retinal sensitivities at the different test locations, expressed in Decibels (dB). The mean deviation in the visual field reflects the overall depression (deviation from normal values). Negative values indicate a reduction in visual field. The analysis performed is the mean change from baseline at Day 84.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
T-2345
T-2345 Ophthalmic Solution
164
Xalatan
Xalatan (Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution)
170
Total334

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyRan out of IP and decided to discontinue10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicT-2345XalatanTotal
Age, Continuous67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
66.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
66.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Corneal thickness, fellow eye (μm)552.1 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.7
549.4 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.6
550.7 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.6
Corneal thickness, study eye (μm)550.7 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.9
548.7 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.5
549.6 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants22 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
146 Participants148 Participants294 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
37 Participants28 Participants65 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
125 Participants141 Participants266 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
164 participants170 participants334 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
104 Participants100 Participants204 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants70 Participants130 Participants
Shaffer angle by gonioscopy, fellow eye
Schaffer Angle Grade III
83 Participants84 Participants167 Participants
Shaffer angle by gonioscopy, fellow eye
Schaffer Angle Grade IV
81 Participants86 Participants167 Participants
Shaffer angle by gonioscopy, study eye
Schaffer Angle Grade III
83 Participants84 Participants167 Participants
Shaffer angle by gonioscopy, study eye
Schaffer Angle Grade IV
81 Participants86 Participants167 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1651 / 169
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 16544 / 169
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1654 / 169

Outcome results

Primary

Intraocular Pressure

Evaluation of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Primary outcome was the between group difference in the change from baseline in IOP at each of 9 assessment points. Equivalence was achieved if the 95% Confidence Intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at all 9 time points

Time frame: Measured at 8am 10 am and 4 pm at Baseline and on Days 15, 42 and 84

Population: The Per Protocol population was the primary efficacy population and consisted of those subjects in the ITT population who had no major protocol violations and no missing data points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 84 08:00-3.0 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 15 10:00-2.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.9
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 42 16:00-2.3 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.9
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 15 16:00-2.3 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.8
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 84 10:00-2.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 3
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 42 08:00-3.0 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 15 08:00-3.0 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 42 10:00-2.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.1
T-2345Intraocular PressureDay 84 16:00-2.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.8
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 42 10:00-3.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.4
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 84 16:00-2.9 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 84 10:00-3.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.1
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 42 16:00-3.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.4
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 84 08:00-3.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 15 08:00-3.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.4
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 15 10:00-3.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.3
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 15 16:00-3.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.3
XalatanIntraocular PressureDay 42 08:00-3.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 3.2
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.009195% CI: [0.195, 1.366]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.009895% CI: [0.161, 1.167]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.039895% CI: [0.025, 1.058]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.100895% CI: [-0.093, 1.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.055895% CI: [-0.013, 1.024]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.049195% CI: [0.002, 1.074]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.002595% CI: [0.286, 1.329]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.011395% CI: [0.143, 1.111]ANCOVA
Comparison: The primary endpoint was measured at 9 separate assessment times (3 time points over a 12 hour period on 3 separate days. The primary analysis was based on a comparison of the IOP change from baseline between the two arms at each assessment.The equivalence margin was tested using an analysis of covariance on change from baseline with pooled site and baseline as a factor. Equivalence was considered to be met if the 95% confidence intervals were within 1.5 mmHg at each of the 9 assessment points.p-value: 0.064995% CI: [-0.063, 0.975]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Deviation in Visual Field

Visual Field was performed using an automated perimeter according to the sites standard protocol. This test measures the angle of the visual field from the central visual axis. Visual Field Testing generates a numerical scale as its main result which shows the retinal sensitivities at the different test locations, expressed in Decibels (dB). The mean deviation in the visual field reflects the overall depression (deviation from normal values). Negative values indicate a reduction in visual field. The analysis performed is the mean change from baseline at Day 84.

Time frame: Baseline and 84 days

Population: Safety population defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the allocated study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-2345Mean Deviation in Visual FieldStudy eye-0.169 Decibels (dB)Standard Deviation 1.607
T-2345Mean Deviation in Visual FieldFellow eye0.067 Decibels (dB)Standard Deviation 2.124
XalatanMean Deviation in Visual FieldStudy eye-0.166 Decibels (dB)Standard Deviation 1.68
XalatanMean Deviation in Visual FieldFellow eye-0.094 Decibels (dB)Standard Deviation 1.466
Secondary

Ophthalmoscopy

Number of participants with eye abnormalities following ophthalmoscopy. Direct ophthalmoscopy with dilation included assessment of the optic nerve head for pallor and cupping. A dilated fundus examination consisting of the vitreous, optic nerve, macula, and peripheral retina was conducted. Results are reported as the number of subjects with clinical significant abnormalities at Day 84 that were not clinically significant at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 84 days

Population: Safety population defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the allocated study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
T-2345OphthalmoscopyStudy eye1 Participants
T-2345OphthalmoscopyFellow eye1 Participants
XalatanOphthalmoscopyStudy eye0 Participants
XalatanOphthalmoscopyFellow eye0 Participants
Secondary

Slit Lamp Examination

Number of participants with eye abnormalities following routine slit lamp examination. The anterior segment of the eye including lids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, iris and lens were evaluated with a routine slit lamp examination and any abnormalities observed were reported.

Time frame: Baseline and 84 days

Population: Safety population defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the allocated study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
T-2345Slit Lamp ExaminationCornea1 Participants
T-2345Slit Lamp ExaminationIris0 Participants
T-2345Slit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva2 Participants
T-2345Slit Lamp ExaminationLens3 Participants
T-2345Slit Lamp ExaminationLid4 Participants
XalatanSlit Lamp ExaminationLens6 Participants
XalatanSlit Lamp ExaminationLid0 Participants
XalatanSlit Lamp ExaminationCornea2 Participants
XalatanSlit Lamp ExaminationConjunctiva2 Participants
XalatanSlit Lamp ExaminationIris1 Participants
Secondary

Visual Acuity

Visual Acuity was measured using the Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity method reported as the Logarithm Minimum Angle of Resoution (logMAR) change from baseline. The Snellen eye chart was used with the subject's current corrected lens prescription at a distance equivalent to 20 feet. Results from the Snellen chart were converted to the logMAR scale which is the standard tool for reporting visual acuity outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and 84 days

Population: Safety population defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the allocated study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-2345Visual Acuity-0.003 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.075
XalatanVisual Acuity-0.008 logMAR unitsStandard Deviation 0.082

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026