Skip to content

Evaluating an Internet-based Program for Anxious Youth: a Pilot RCT

Evaluating an Internet-based Program for Anxious Youth: a Pilot RCT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02059226
Enrollment
94
Registered
2014-02-11
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety

Brief summary

Anxiety is a common mental health problem for Canadian youth. Anxiety that is diagnosed as a disorder and serious enough to require treatment affects up to 10% of all youth by the age of 16. Anxiety disorders can have serious negative effects on a young person's personal relationships, school performance, and family life. These disorders may not be discovered by youth, parents and health care providers. Even if anxiety disorders are discovered, youth may not get the right therapy. Anxious youth can become sick if their anxiety is not treated properly. The investigative team will carry out research to test Breathe, their new Internet-based treatment for youth with anxiety problems. Youth can use this treatment at home. Breathe includes information materials and personalized homework assignments to help anxious youth learn ways to manage anxiety. This study is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two groups, an Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) experimental group (Breathe) and a resource webpage (control group; considered treatment as usual for youth waiting for services). The investigators will evaluate several methodological processes and outcomes through the following objectives: 1. To evaluate the change in youths' anxiety (primary outcome) from pre- to post- intervention. 2. To estimate recruitment and retention rates for a full-scale RCT. 3. To estimate a sample size for a full-scale RCT. 4. To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the primary outcome measure. 5. To measure intervention acceptability. 6. To determine the use of co-interventions during the trial. 7. To conduct a preliminary economic analysis.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcognitive behavioural therapy

Internet-based CBT

OTHERInternet-based resource page

Static webpage

Sponsors

IWK Health Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Mandi Newton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* DSM-IV social anxiety, generalized anxiety, anxiety not otherwise specified, or adjustment disorder as the primary clinical problem * ability to read and write English * regular access to a telephone and a computer system with high speed Internet service * ability to use a computer to interact with web material * youth aged 13-14 must have a consenting parent

Exclusion criteria

* youth with an anxiety problem that is not included above * youth who receive cognitive behavioural therapy * youth who cannot provide consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in anxiety at 8 weeksat 8 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)Anxiety will be measured using the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention rateat 30 months
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)at 8 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)We will ask youth allocated to the intervention arm about a MCID. The MCID represents the minimum change considered meaningful from the youth's perspective such that they consider treatment worth participating in. We will use the MCID to determine intervention effectiveness in a full-scale trial. To estimate the MCID, we will use youths' global ratings of change on a 10-point Likert scale (-5 to +5), a commonly used anchor.
Intervention acceptabilityat 8 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)Satisfaction will be measured to infer intervention acceptability, which will be measured in youth allocated to the treatment arm. A 10-item instrument will measure engagement and sense of privacy, expectations and usefulness, communication, and technical (intervention) management. For 10 statements, a 4-point Likert response format ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree will be used. Scores will range from 10 to 40 with scores ≥ 30 indicating higher acceptability.
Recruitment rateat 27 months
Resource use/costsat 8 weeksThe following will be reviewed: (i) software development and maintenance costs (for intervention maintenance and delivery), (ii) training and personnel costs for intervention, (iii) health care utilization data (e.g., self-reported visits to the emergency department, hospital admission), and (iv) other reported costs reported (i.e., time off from work/school).
Intervention adherenceat 8 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)Intervention adherence will also be measured to infer intervention acceptability. Intervention adherence will be measured by documenting the number of modules and homework tasks completed. We will also record the number of tailored modules completed by each youth (treatment arm) and site visits (control arm). These data will be collected through the intervention's software system.
Co-intervention useat 8 weeks (i.e., post-intervention)We will ask youth whether they used other health care resources during the study (e.g., emergency department visit, other treatments, medication) and reasons for this use (e.g., unmet need, medication prescribed before the study).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026