Skip to content

Efficacy of Coherence Therapy for Procrastination

Efficacy of Coherence Therapy for Procrastination: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02058797
Acronym
CTFORPRO
Enrollment
31
Registered
2014-02-10
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procrastination

Keywords

Procrastination, Coherence Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Repertory Grid Technique, Cognitive Conflicts, Personal Dilemmas

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Coherence Therapy in treating procrastination. For that, this intervention is compared to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy which was already proved to be efficacious in treating this problem. The method used is a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed description

Procrastination is a recognized difficulty that entails negative outcomes regarding performance and subjective well-being. In order to find effective treatments for procrastination, the present study wants to test the efficacy of Coherence Therapy, compared with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Procrastination, negative emotional states and cognitive structure will be assessed in pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation. A total of 30 students will be randomly assigned to Coherence Therapy (n=15) or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (n=15). In both forms of treatment students will receive three weekly sessions and one more session six to seven weeks after the third session. The treatment will be provided by trained psychotherapists. Findings would clarify the effectiveness of Coherence Therapy for the treatment of procrastination and the change of emotional states and cognitive structure of the students after the treatment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCoherence Therapy

Manualized individual treatment (3 + 1 one-hour sessions)

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy

Manualized individual treatment (3 + 1 one-hour sessions)

Sponsors

University of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 26 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being a student * 19-26 years old * A score above 51 on the General Procrastination Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Being currently under a psychological treatment * Being diagnosed lately with any mental disorder * Mental retardation * Substantial visual, hearing or cognitive deficits * Psychotic symptoms * Organic brain dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Procrastination Scale (Lay, 1986)Post-treatment assessment (10-12 weeks)Change from Baseline in General Procrastination Scale measured before and after the therapy in order to determine the level of general procrastination.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Repertory Grid Technique (Kelly, 1995; adaptation of Feixas & Cornejo, 1996)Post-treatment assessment (10-12 weeks)Change in cognitive structure measured by Kelly's Repertory Grid Technique.
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)Post-treatment assessment (10-12 weeks)Change from Baseline in negative emotional states on three dimensions: depression, anxiety and stress.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026