Skip to content

ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity

ADDRESS - Multicenter, Partially-randomized Controlled Trial of Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Adult Spine Deformity

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02058238
Enrollment
0
Registered
2014-02-10
Start date
2014-10-03
Completion date
2015-03-01
Last updated
2020-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kyphoscoliosis, Kyphosis, Scoliosis, Spinal Deformity, Spondylosis

Keywords

Robotic-guided spinal fusions, Scoliosis, Kyphoscoliosis, Spinal deformity, Spondylosis

Brief summary

To quantify potential short- and long-term benefits of robotically-guided minimally invasive (MIS) or open-approach spine surgery in adult patients undergoing multi-level spinal instrumentation surgery, in comparison to image- or navigation-guided instrumentation in a matching cohort of control patients, performed using a freehand technique, both in MIS and open approaches.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Mazor Robotics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (age 21 years and older), undergoing long (5 consecutive vertebrae or more) spinal fusion surgery, between T1 to the sacrum. 2. Cases may include surgeries involving iliac screws (e.g., Galveston technique or S2AI screws) although these screws will not be included in the data analysis. 3. Cases may include augmented cases (when one or more of the screws are inserted into vertebrae after a vertebral augmentation procedure, such as kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty). 4. Patient capable of complying with study requirements 5. Signed informed consent by patient

Exclusion criteria

1. Infection or malignancy 2. Primary abnormalities of bones (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta) 3. Primary muscle diseases, such as muscular dystrophy 4. Neurologic diseases (e.g. Charcot-Marie Tooth, Guillain-Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, or neurofibroma) 5. Spinal cord abnormalities with any neurologic symptoms or signs 6. Spinal cord lesions requiring neurosurgical interventions, such as hydromyelia 7. Paraplegia 8. Patients who have participated in a research study involving an investigational product in the 12 weeks prior to surgery 9. Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study. 10. Pregnancy 11. Patient cannot follow study protocol, for any reason 12. Patient cannot or will not sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of surgical complications1 yearNew neural deficits, implant-related durotomy, infection requiring surgery, excessive blood loss
Intraoperative radiation exposureDay of operationas measured by the C-arm, normalized per screw
Revision surgeries2 yearsAll cause revisions, including medical and surgical complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Times of intra-operative stagesDay of surgeryInstrumentation time per screw, total surgery time
Implant FailureWithin 1 year post-surgeryThe implant failure rate as measured within one year post-surgery
Number of Abandoned ScrewsDay of surgeryNumber of screws intended to be instrumented with the robot and abandoned for cause.
Number of screws instrumented freehandDay of surgeryNumber of screws planned to be instrumented robotically and instrumented freehand instead.
Clinical performance of instrumentation techniqueDay of surgeryImplant instrumentation time, length of surgery
Clinical outcome measures assessed using health-related quality of life questionnairesup to 10 years post-operativeVisual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS22 questionnaire, European Quality - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L)
Pedicle screw instrumentation accuracyWithin 1 year of surgeryAccuracy will be quantified in millimeters and scored using the Gertzbein Robbins classification, based on post-operative CTs that are clinically necessary for the management of the patient.
Length of convalescenceWithin 2 years of surgeryLength of stay at the hospital, destination at discharge, time to return to normal activities, time to return to work
Neuromonitoring eventsDay of surgeryThe number of clinically significant neuromonitoring events that may or may not lead to removal or reinstrumentation of the pedicle screw.
Deformity correction as measured on plain radiographsWithin 2 years from surgeryParameters of sagittal and coronal balance
Fusion rate/pseudoarthrosisWithin one year post-surgeryFusion/pseudoarthrosis as measured within one year of surgery
Ratio of executed vs. planned screwsDay of surgeryNumber of screws planned to be robotically inserted but manually inserted instead, and cause.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026