Skip to content

Echocardiographic Analysis in Healthy Child.

Speckle Tracking 2D Echocardiography in Healthy Child. Comparison of Two Different Software Systems : Echopac (General Electric) and QLAB 9.0 (Philips).

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02056925
Enrollment
163
Registered
2014-02-06
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2019-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Child

Brief summary

· 2D Speckle Tracking echocardiography gained importance for the evaluation of ventricle contractility. Many indications have been developed in child population. However, the comparability of measurements between different software systems is not well defined. We choose to compare two software systems very often used in paediatric subjects : Echopac by General Electric and QLAB 9.0 by Philips. We offer a randomly second echocardiography to children which have normal heart. We compare Strain and Strain rate results between the two tests with a study of variability : ultrasound variability, operator variability, reader variability.

Detailed description

· We select children addressed to paediatric cardiologist for not serious reason (heart murmur, chest pain, sport capacity…), which had normal heart after evaluation. If they satisfied all inclusive criteria (0 to 17 years old, parental agreement, social security fund) and neither exclusive criteria (cardiac, respiratory or muscular problems, chronic diseases, drug with heart impact, poor image quality), we randomly execute a second echocardiography. Echocardiography are done with Vivid 7 ultrasound (General Electrics) and/or IE 33 ultrasound (Philips) by one or two trained operators. Strain loops are taken on three standard apical views (two, three and four-chamber views), short axis midventricular and aortic views, sub-costal short axis aortic view and sub-costal four-chamber apical views. Strain analysis are done in a second steps by one or two trained readers with adapted software : Echopac (General Electrics) or QLAB 0.0 (Philips). Strain and Strain rate results are collected for each ventricle in each dimension.We compare results between the two tests and done statistical analysis with a study of variability : ultrasound variability, operator variability, reader variability (correlation coefficient). We also done a feasibility study with use of poor image qualityexclusion criteria.

Interventions

OTHEREchocardiography

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* child (0 to 17 years included) * normal heart * parental agreement * affiliate with social security fund

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
strainduring echocardiographyStrain and Strain rates measurements for each ventricle in longitudinal and radial dimension with a study of variability: ultrasound variability, operator variability, reader variability

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026