Skip to content

chronOS Inject in Proximal Tibial Fractures

Prospective, Multi-Center, Observational Study Evaluating the Augmentation With Calcium Phosphate Cement (chronOS Inject) for Bone Defect After Internal Fixation of Proximal Tibial Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02056834
Enrollment
36
Registered
2014-02-06
Start date
2010-03-01
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 41, Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture AO-OTA 42, Closed Proximal Tibial Fracture Schatzker I - VI

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study was to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures. Secondary objectives were to assess the surgeon's satisfaction in using chronOS Inject and patient satisfaction post surgery. The study was planned to be a multi-center, prospective, observational study. Patients with proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzker I - VI, AO-Müller-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect were assessed for eligibility to enter the study. Patients eligible for the study were followed over time to twelve months after surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEchronOS Inject

chronOS Inject is used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures

Sponsors

Synthes GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with closed proximal tibial fractures defined by : Tibia plateau, Schatzker I - VI, AO-OTA 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect * Skeletally mature adult 18 years or older, with close of growth plate at the time of surgery * Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to scheduled visits, treatment plan, completing forms, and other study procedures * Personally signed and dated informed consent document prior to any study-related procedures indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Open fractures with severe soft tissue damage * Proximal tibial fractures with tumor or osteomyelitis * Any tibial anatomy or disease process that would interfere with deployment or performance of the device as defined by the surgeon * Osteopenia or Osteoporosis: if dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is required, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T score \<=-1.0 * Known history of Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease * Morbid obesity defined as a body mass index \>40 kg/m2 or weight more than 50 kg over ideal body weight * Active malignancy. A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless treated with curative intent and there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy \>5 years * Known or documented history of communicable disease, including AIDS and HIV * Active Hepatitis (receiving medical treatment within two years) * Active systemic or local infection * Active rheumatoid arthritis, non-controlled diabetes mellitus, or any other medical condition(s) that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing * Current or recent history (within last 2 years) of substance abuse (e.g., recreational drugs, narcotics, or alcohol) * Immunologically suppressed, or has received systemic steroids, excluding nasal steroids, at any dose daily for \>1 month within last 12 months * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study period * Involved in study of another investigational product that may affect outcome * History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales * Patients who are incarcerated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture Union12 monthsFracture union (complete bone healing) was assessed by the investigators based on anteroposterior and lateral X-rays
Articular Subsidence12 monthsEvidence of articular subsidence (collapse of surface pertaining to the joint) of ≥2 mm was assessed by the investigators
Mean Time to Union12 monthsMean time to union was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anatomical Gradings Assessed Radiographically12 monthsThe following was assessed: * depression of knee joint: presence or absence * condylar widening (enlargement of the knee joint): presence or absence * angulation; valgus/varus (abnormal outward/inward turning of the knee): presence or absence
Patient's Satisfaction12 monthsSatisfaction with treatment was assessed by the subjects, where subjects indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.
Surgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductPost-surgerySatisfaction with product was assessed by the surgeon post-operatively, where surgeons indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated absolutely unacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.
Extension Ability and Stability12 monthsThe following was assessed: * extension ability of the knee * stability of the knee in extension
Peri-operative Complications12 months
Absorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement12 monthsAbsorption of calcium phosphate cement over time was calculated from X-rays with the INFINITT program.
SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)12 monthsThe SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and at follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.
VAS Leg Pain Intensity12 monthsThe subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.
VAS Leg Pain Frequency12 monthsThe subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain frequency was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all and 100 represented pain always.
Lysholm Knee Scale12 monthsThe Lysholm knee scale is a condition-specific outcome measure that was originally designed to assess ligament injuries of the knee. The survey was administered to subject at follow-up visits and comprises 8 subscales related to limp, support, stair climbing, squatting, walking, running and jumping as well as a question related to the atrophy of the thigh. The responses to these 8 questions are graded to provide a maximum result of 100 points.
SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)12 monthsThe SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and all follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.
Patients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing12 months
Total Range of Motion12 months

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
chronOS Inject
Closed proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzker I - VI, AO-OTA 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect
36
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicchronOS Inject
Accident type
Car occupant in traffic accident
7 participants
Accident type
Direct blow
9 participants
Accident type
Fall from height
3 participants
Accident type
High energy
23 participants
Accident type
Low energy
1 participants
Accident type
Motorcycle accident
4 participants
Accident type
Other
2 participants
Accident type
Pedestrian in traffic accident
11 participants
Accident type
Simple fall
3 participants
Accident type
Sport
1 participants
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Age, Customized
Age group <=58 years
19 participants
Age, Customized
Age group >58 years
17 participants
Body mass index23.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.67
Exercise per week
1-2 times per week
21 participants
Exercise per week
3-4 times per week
5 participants
Exercise per week
5 or more times per week
1 participants
Exercise per week
Never
9 participants
Fracture type
AO-OTA 41 (proximal tibia fracture)
29 participants
Fracture type
AO-OTA 42 (diaphyseal tibia fracture)
0 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type III (pure lateral depression)
0 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type II (split with depression)
14 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type I (lateral split)
1 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type IV (pure medial depression)
2 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type V (bicondylar)
6 participants
Fracture type
Schatzker Type VI (split extends to metadiaphysis)
10 participants
Health status
Excellent
4 participants
Health status
Fair
3 participants
Health status
Good
28 participants
Health status
Missing
1 participants
Health status
Poor
0 participants
Height163.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.99
Occupation
Home worker
7 participants
Occupation
Light industrial or light industrial labour
6 participants
Occupation
Moderate industrial or moderate physical labour
5 participants
Occupation
Office worker
5 participants
Occupation
Other
4 participants
Occupation
Retired
6 participants
Occupation
Student
3 participants
Preoperative medical condition
Any
14 participants
Preoperative medical condition
None
22 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Adiposity
1 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Allergies
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Cancer
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Cardiac
4 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Congenital
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Dermatological
1 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Endocrine
4 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Hematologic
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Implants/Prosthesis
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Infection
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Musculoskeletal including fractures
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Neurologic
1 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Other
3 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Psychiatric
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Respiratory
2 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Urogenital
0 participants
Preoperative medical conditions (description)
Vascular
3 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants
Smoking status
Current
9 participants
Smoking status
Former
4 participants
Smoking status
Never
23 participants
Weight62.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Articular Subsidence

Evidence of articular subsidence (collapse of surface pertaining to the joint) of ≥2 mm was assessed by the investigators

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectArticular SubsidenceAbsent28 participants
chronOS InjectArticular SubsidencePresent1 participants
Primary

Fracture Union

Fracture union (complete bone healing) was assessed by the investigators based on anteroposterior and lateral X-rays

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectFracture UnionUnion27 participants
chronOS InjectFracture UnionNon-union2 participants
Primary

Mean Time to Union

Mean time to union was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectMean Time to Union7.5 monthsStandard Deviation 0.441
Secondary

Absorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement

Absorption of calcium phosphate cement over time was calculated from X-rays with the INFINITT program.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectAbsorption Rate of Calcium Phosphate Cement0.64 percentage of absorption at 12 monthsStandard Deviation 0.115
Secondary

Anatomical Gradings Assessed Radiographically

The following was assessed: * depression of knee joint: presence or absence * condylar widening (enlargement of the knee joint): presence or absence * angulation; valgus/varus (abnormal outward/inward turning of the knee): presence or absence

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectAnatomical Gradings Assessed RadiographicallyAbsence of depression28 participants
chronOS InjectAnatomical Gradings Assessed RadiographicallyAbsence of condylar widening28 participants
chronOS InjectAnatomical Gradings Assessed RadiographicallyAbsence of angulation29 participants
Secondary

Extension Ability and Stability

The following was assessed: * extension ability of the knee * stability of the knee in extension

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectExtension Ability and StabilityNormal extension ability26 participants
chronOS InjectExtension Ability and Stability0-10 degree extension ability3 participants
chronOS InjectExtension Ability and StabilityNormal extension stability28 participants
chronOS InjectExtension Ability and StabilityAbnormal extension stability1 participants
Secondary

Lysholm Knee Scale

The Lysholm knee scale is a condition-specific outcome measure that was originally designed to assess ligament injuries of the knee. The survey was administered to subject at follow-up visits and comprises 8 subscales related to limp, support, stair climbing, squatting, walking, running and jumping as well as a question related to the atrophy of the thigh. The responses to these 8 questions are graded to provide a maximum result of 100 points.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectLysholm Knee ScaleExcellent (95-100)14 participants
chronOS InjectLysholm Knee ScaleGood (84-94)11 participants
chronOS InjectLysholm Knee ScaleFair (65-83)3 participants
chronOS InjectLysholm Knee ScalePoor (<65)1 participants
Secondary

Patient's Satisfaction

Satisfaction with treatment was assessed by the subjects, where subjects indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectPatient's Satisfaction80.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.02
Secondary

Patients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectPatients Who Reached Full Weight Bearing29 participants
Secondary

Peri-operative Complications

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectPeri-operative ComplicationsMicroscopic or radiologic cement leakage during OP0 participants
chronOS InjectPeri-operative ComplicationsBreakage of fixing device post-OP0 participants
chronOS InjectPeri-operative ComplicationsRe-OP during hospital stay0 participants
chronOS InjectPeri-operative ComplicationsSuffer from surgical wound complication post-OP0 participants
Secondary

SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)

The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and at follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectSF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)Score at baseline46.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.707
chronOS InjectSF-12 Short Form Health Survey Mental Composite Score (MCS)Score at 12 months46.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.145
Comparison: Paired T-Test p-value tests the significance of the percent change from baseline within each treatment group.p-value: 0.3785t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

SF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)

The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and all follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score \[PCS\] and mental composite score \[MCS\]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectSF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)Score at baseline37.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.616
chronOS InjectSF-12 Short Form Health Survey Physical Composite Score (PCS)Score at 12 months42.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.589
Comparison: Paired T-Test p-value tests the significance of the percent change from baseline within each treatment group.p-value: 0.0166t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Surgeon's Satisfaction With the Product

Satisfaction with product was assessed by the surgeon post-operatively, where surgeons indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated absolutely unacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.

Time frame: Post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductMixing ability87.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductInjecting ability87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductApplication time87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductMoldability81.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.59
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductSetting time77.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.54
chronOS InjectSurgeon's Satisfaction With the ProductRate of chronOS over bone graft68.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.39
Secondary

Total Range of Motion

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
chronOS InjectTotal Range of MotionAt least 140 degree17 participants
chronOS InjectTotal Range of MotionAt least 120 degree11 participants
chronOS InjectTotal Range of MotionAt least 90 degree1 participants
chronOS InjectTotal Range of MotionAt least 60 degree0 participants
chronOS InjectTotal Range of MotionAt least 30 degree0 participants
Secondary

VAS Leg Pain Frequency

The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain frequency was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all and 100 represented pain always.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectVAS Leg Pain FrequencyScore at baseline57.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.505
chronOS InjectVAS Leg Pain FrequencyScore at 12 months20.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.051
Comparison: Paired T-Test p-value tests the significance of the change from baseline within treatment group.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

VAS Leg Pain Intensity

The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
chronOS InjectVAS Leg Pain IntensityScore at baseline61.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.714
chronOS InjectVAS Leg Pain IntensityScore at 12 months17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.592
Comparison: Paired T-Test p-value tests the significance of the change from baseline within treatment group.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026