Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Minocycline in Angelman Syndrome

Randomized Clinical Trial, Placebo Compared to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Minocycline in Angelman Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02056665
Acronym
A-MANECE
Enrollment
32
Registered
2014-02-06
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2015-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angelman Syndrome

Keywords

Angelman Syndrome, EFFICACY, SAFETY, MINOCYCLINE, Pediatrics population, Rare diseases

Brief summary

RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL, PLACEBO COMPARED TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MINOCYCLINE IN ANGELMAN SYNDROME (A-MANECE STUDY)

Detailed description

STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MINOCYCLINE IN ANGELMAN SYNDROME

Interventions

DRUGMINOCYCLINE

Pill Minocycline 50 mg capsule

Pill manufactured to mimic Minocycline 50 mg capsule

Sponsors

Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female between 6 and 30 years old. * Clinical diagnosis of Angelman Syndrome and molecular confirmation of diagnosis. * The participant has an acceptable guardian can give consent on behalf of the participant.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hypersensitivity to tetracyclines. * Patients with impaired hepatic or renal function and in those with mainly drug allergy history. * Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator is considered clinically relevant and that administration of minocycline contraindicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Increased on the equivalent age of development8, 16 and 24 weeksIncreased on the equivalent age of development, obtained through Development Scale R Merrill-Palmer (MP-R)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improved specific cognitive, language and communication, motor development, social-emotional and adaptive behavior8, 16 and 24 weeksImproved specific cognitive, language and communication, motor development, social-emotional and adaptive behavior obtained through Development Scale R Merrill-Palmer (MP-R)
Improvement of EEG.8, 16 and 24 weeksImprovement of EEG. Measure based on changes in the background activity, type, number and duration of crises, widespread tendency to crises, paroxysmal abnormalities recorded types and the overall evaluation of clinical neurophysiologist
Safety and tolerability8, 16 and 24 weeksa) Physical Examination b) Vital signs c) Laboratory Tests d) Adverse effects (AEs) list for treatment, laboratory values, values outside the reference range and descriptive statistics.
Clinical Global impression (CGI)8, 16 and 24 weeksImprovement of CGI. . Measure based on changes in the Clinical Global Impression through the perception of parents or guardians, you neurologists and therapist

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026