Skip to content

Pedunculopontine Nucleus Stimulation for Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease

Effects of Low Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus on Gait and Balance Disorders of Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02055261
Enrollment
6
Registered
2014-02-05
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2014-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Brief summary

The appearance of postural instability and gait disorders is a major turning point in the evolution of Parkinson's disease (PD). These axial symptoms are usually unresponsive to L-Dopa and represent a severe impairment for the patients due to frequent falls and reduced outside mobility. There is no effective pharmacological treatment available for these symptoms, and their pathophysiology is not well known : it is currently assumed that non-dopaminergic brainstem lesions participate to axial symptoms in PD. Surgically, these patients cannot benefit from high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) since this operation tends to even aggravate axial symptoms unresponsive to L-Dopa in some patients. A dysfunction of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) might be at the origin of these axial symptoms, since the PPN participates in the maintenance of posture and motion in primates. In PD patients, recent reports have suggested that low frequency stimulation of the PPN may equally improve gait and posture. However, these results are debatable due to methodological limitations, insufficient clinical evaluation and uncertain anatomical targeting. Thus, our aim is to propose a low frequency PPN stimulation to six advanced PD patients according to the usual criteria for STN DBS who are, however, unsuitable for this operation due to gait and posture disorders. We will perform a randomized, double-blind and cross over design (two months periods with and without DBS randomly assigned to each patient). The targeting will be allowed by a a three-dimensional and deformable atlas of the basal ganglia fusioned with the stereotaxic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of each patient. Evaluations will comprise 1 month before surgery and in Off and On stimulation condition: * clinical motor assessment in both Off and On drug state, including cardinal parkinsonian signs, gait and balance * gait initiation physiological evaluation * cognitive and behavioral testing If our hypothesis is confirmed, low frequency PPN stimulation may well represent a substantial improvement of our therapeutic options for advanced PD patients suffering from debilitating gait and posture disorders unresponsive to L-Dopa.

Interventions

DEVICELow frequency DBS of the pedunculopontine nucleus

Sponsors

Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Parkinson's disease * Age \< 70 and \> = 18 years * Improvement \> or = 50 % during acute levodopa test * Score \> or = 2 on item 29 of UPDRS part 3 score obtained in off drug state * No previous DBS * No evidence of atypical parkinsonism * No dementia (MATTIS \> 129) * No psychiatric disease * Contraception if woman * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contra indication to surgery * Contra indication to MRI * Severe life threatening comorbidity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim off drug and On stim off drug conditions4 months and 6 months after surgeryThe primary outcome criteria will be the comparison between RSGE total score in obtained 'Off' and 'On' stimulation conditions either at 4 or 6 months after surgery according to the randomized order of the cross-over

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim Off drug and No stim off drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between Off Stim On drug and ON stim On drug conditions4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between No Stim On drug and Off stim On drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between No Stim Off drug and On stim off drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between No Stim Off drug and Off stim off drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Adverse events records1 month before surgery, 1-2-3-4-5-6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between Off Stim Off drug and ON stim Off drug conditions4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim on drug and On stim on drug conditions4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between Off Stim On drug and ON stim On drug conditions4 and 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between Off Stim Off drug and No stim Off drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of UPDRS part 3 score between Off Stim On drug and No stim On drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'Off stim On drug and No stim on drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim Off drug and No stim off drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of Rating scale for gait evaluation between 'On stim On drug and No stim On drug conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Change of gait physiological parameters between Off Stim Off drug and ON stim Off drug conditions4 and 6 months after surgery

Other

MeasureTime frame
changes in cognitive evaluation between No stim and 'Off stim conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
changes in cognitive evaluation between No stim and 'On stim conditions1 month before surgery and 4 or 6 months after surgery
Changes in sleep architecture between off stim and on stim conditions4 and 6 months after surgery
changes in cognitive evaluation between Off stim and 'On stim conditions4 and 6 months after surgery

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026