Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo in Drug-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo in Drug-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02054897
Acronym
SUSTAIN™1
Enrollment
388
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2014-02-03
Completion date
2015-05-08
Last updated
2019-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly versus placebo in drug-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes. (SUSTAIN™ 1-Monotherapy).

Interventions

DRUGsemaglutide

Once weekly, administrated subcutaneously (s.c. under the skin)

DRUGplacebo

Once weekly, administrated subcutaneously (s.c. under the skin)

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- For Japan only: Male or female, age above or equal to 20 years at the time of signing inform consent - Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and treated with diet and exercise for at least 30 days before screening - HbA1c 7.0 - 10.0 % (53 - 86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice) throughout the trial including the 5 week follow-up period. United Kingdom: Adequate contraceptive measures are defined as established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception, placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system, barrier methods of contraception (condom or occlusive cap with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository), male sterilisation (where partner is sole partner of subject), or true abstinence (when in line with preferred and usual lifestyle) - Any chronic disorder or severe disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol - Treatment with any glucose lowering agent(s) in a period of 90 days prior to screening. An exception is short-term treatment (no longer than 7 days in total) with insulin in connection with inter-current illness - History of chronic or idiopathic acute pancreatitis - Screening calcitonin value above or equal to 50 ng/L (pg/mL) - Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) - Impaired renal function defined as eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate ) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 per modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula (4 variable version) - Acute coronary or cerebrovascular event within 90 days before randomisation - Heart failure, New York Heart Association class IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body WeightWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetAt 30 weeks of treatmentPercentage of subjects who achieve (yes/no): HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) American Diabetes Association target after 30 weeks' treatment. Missing HbA1c data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetAt 30 weeks of treatmentPercentage of subjects who achieve (yes/no): HbA1c below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) American Diabetes Association target after 30 weeks' treatment. Missing HbA1c data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Countries

Canada, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Romania, Russia, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Out of 87 sites, selected for recruitment, 72 sites in 8 countries randomised subjects: Canada: 7 sites; Italy: 6 sites; Japan: 5 sites; Mexico: 2 sites; Russian Federation: 8 sites; South Africa: 8 sites; United Kingdom: 4 sites; United States: 32 sites.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
Subjects were given 0.25 mg semaglutide once weekly s.c. injection for 4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg semaglutide once weekly s.c. injections for the remaining 26 weeks of the treatment period.
128
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
Subjects were given 0.25 mg semaglutide once weekly s.c. injection for 4 weeks, 0.5 mg semaglutide once weekly s.c. injections for the next 4 weeks followed by 1.0 mg semaglutide once weekly s.c. injections for the remaining 22 weeks of the treatment period.
130
Placebo
Subjects were randomised to either of the 2 placebo arms (i.e., semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg) and then pooled for data analysis. 1. Placebo 0.5 mg arm: Subjects were given 0.25 mg placebo once weekly s.c. injections for 4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg placebo once weekly s.c. injections for the remaining 26 weeks of the treatment period. 2. Placebo 1.0 mg arm: Subjects were given 0.25 mg placebo once weekly s.c. injections for 4 weeks, 0.5 mg placebo once weekly s.c. injections for the next 4 weeks followed by 1.0 mg placebo once weekly s.c. injections for the remaining 22 weeks of the treatment period.
129
Total387

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up427
Overall StudyMissing follow-up information353
Overall StudyRandomized but not exposed100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSemaglutide 0.5 mgSemaglutide 1.0 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous54.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
52.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
53.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
53.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Body weight89.81 kilogram(s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.96
96.87 kilogram(s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.59
89.05 kilogram(s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.16
91.93 kilogram(s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.83
Diastolic blood pressure79.52 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
79.25 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.52
79.14 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
79.30 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
Fasting plasma glucose9.66 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77
9.90 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
9.68 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77
9.75 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.67
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)8.09 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89
8.12 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
7.95 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
8.05 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
Sex: Female, Male
Female
68 Participants50 Participants59 Participants177 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants80 Participants70 Participants210 Participants
Systolic blood pressure127.87 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15
128.89 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.92
129.57 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
128.78 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 12847 / 13027 / 129
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1287 / 1305 / 129

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 0.5 mgChange in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-1.47 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.02
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-1.56 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)-0.00 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
Comparison: For the primary HbA1c endpoint, superiority was planned to be tested for semaglutide 1.0 mg versus placebo. The post-baseline responses were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.81, -1.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: For the primary HbA1c endpoint, superiority was planned to be tested for semaglutide 0.5 mg versus placebo, if superiority for semaglutide 1.0 mg was concluded. The post-baseline responses were analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.71, -1.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Body Weight

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 0.5 mgChange in Body Weight-3.68 kilogram(s)Standard Deviation 4.03
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Body Weight-4.67 kilogram(s)Standard Deviation 5.19
PlaceboChange in Body Weight-0.89 kilogram(s)Standard Deviation 3.46
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set. Number of subject analysed=subjects who contributed to the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 0.5 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-2.41 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.55
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-2.39 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.74
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-0.55 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was evaluated after 30 weeks of treatment. Missing data were imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 0.5 mgChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure-2.29 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.58
Semaglutide 0.5 mgChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure-0.73 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.88
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure-2.74 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.58
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure0.22 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.6
PlaceboChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic blood pressure-2.01 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.23
PlaceboChange in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic blood pressure0.60 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.59
Secondary

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association Target

Percentage of subjects who achieve (yes/no): HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) American Diabetes Association target after 30 weeks' treatment. Missing HbA1c data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: At 30 weeks of treatment

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetYes74.2 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetNo25.8 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetYes72.3 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetNo27.7 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetYes24.8 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association TargetNo75.2 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target

Percentage of subjects who achieve (yes/no): HbA1c below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) American Diabetes Association target after 30 weeks' treatment. Missing HbA1c data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment and country as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Time frame: At 30 weeks of treatment

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetYes59.4 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetNo40.6 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetYes60.0 Percentage of subjects
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetNo40.0 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetYes13.2 Percentage of subjects
PlaceboSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no):HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists TargetNo86.8 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026