Skip to content

RCT to Evaluate the Renal Protective Effects of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Peripheral Angioplasty

Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Reno-protective Benefits of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing Infrainguinal Peripheral Angioplasty

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02054871
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2014-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Keywords

Peripheral Angioplasty, Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning, Contrast Induced Nephropathy

Brief summary

This study aims to demonstrate if remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) may confer renal protection in patients undergoing peripheral angioplasty. Patients will be randomised to receive RIPC and biomarkers for renal injury will be analysed post procedure to determine if any protective benefit was obtained.

Detailed description

Ischaemic preconditioning is an endogenous mammalian mechanism whereby a brief period of ischaemia and reperfusion confers resistance to subsequent prolonged ischaemic insults. First observed in the canine heart, subsequent investigators noted that brief ischaemia in remote organs e.g. skeletal muscle, induced protection in key central organs e.g. the heart. This remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) does not require direct interference with the target organs' blood supply. It can be induced using blood pressure cuffs to produce brief episodes of upper limb ischaemia and reperfusion and confers protection upon numerous organs simultaneously. RIPC reduces myocardial injury following aortic aneurysm repair, cardiac surgery and angioplasty. It also reduces adverse ischaemic events up to six months following percutaneous coronary intervention, implying some medium-term effect. To date ischaemic conditioning has been applied primarily to the heart however animal studies have shown pre conditioning to offer renal protection. Fikret et al in 2012 in the Renal Protection Trial demonstrated a protective benefit with RIPC from the development of CIN in high risk patients undergoing elective coronary angiography.Whittaker and Przyklenk in 2011 explored this concept retrospectively using data from patients who had undergone emergency angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction. The original trial was a RCT which examined the protective effect of postconditioning on myocardial ischemia. The authors retrospectively examined if study patients treated with multiple coronary balloon inflations had better renal function than patients not exposed to this remote conditioning. They concluded that patients in the conditioning group received 25% more contrast volume than the control group and showed no decline in renal function as demonstrated by examination of glomular filtration rate at day 3 post procedure in comparison to the control group which saw a significant decline in renal function. The need for contrast-based procedures is rising, with increasing numbers of patients undergoing endovascular procedures, as is the incidence of postcontrast renal failure, which has a reported mortality of 34%. The potential use of RIPC therefore to reduce the risk of kidney damage needs further investigation in a prospective study and the PAD patient group who are routinely exposed to contrast administration in angiography are an ideal study group.

Interventions

PROCEDURERIPC

A standard, CE-approved tourniquet cuff will be placed around one arm of the patient. It will then be inflated to a pressure of 200mmHg for 5 minutes. For patients with a systolic blood pressure \>185mmHg, the cuff will be inflated to at least 15mmHg above the patient's systolic blood pressure. The cuff will then be deflated and the arm allowed reperfuse for 5 minutes. This will be repeated so that each patient receives a total of 3 ischaemia-reperfusion cycles. Additional, blood and urine samples will be collected on Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 post procedure.

Sponsors

Mid Western Regional Hospital, Ireland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Elective intra-arterial, infrainguinal peripheral angiography/angioplasty * Written informed consent * Patients \>18yrs of age * Patients with CKD (Stage2/3) as evidenced by eGFR \<90ml/min/1.73m2

Exclusion criteria

* Severe renal impairment eGFR \<30ml/min * Evidence of acute renal failure or patients on dialysis * History of previous CIN * Contraindication to intravenous volume replacement therapy * Pregnancy * Patients on glibenclamide or nicorandil (these medications may interfere with RIPC)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Renal impairment72 hours post proceduralSerial assessment of renal biomarkers in serum and urine in 72 hour period post procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anti-inflammatory effect of RIPC3-6 months post recruitmentAssessment of additional postulated benefits of anti-inflammatory effects with RIPC in terms of decreased restenosis rates and lower inflammatory markers

Countries

Ireland

Contacts

Primary ContactKamsila Pillay, MbCHB
kamsilakp@yahoo.co.uk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026