Skip to content

Anesthetic Efficacy in Irreversible Pulpitis

Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine, Lidocaine and Mepivacaine in Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis of Mandibular Molar

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02054767
Enrollment
66
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2014-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

articaine, lidocaine, mepivacaine, inferior alveolar nerve block, irreversible pulpitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of articaine, lidocaine and mepivacaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar.

Detailed description

Conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most commonly used technique for achieving pulpal anesthesia in posterior mandibular endodontic procedures. However, IANB has a high failure rate and success rates are even lower when applied for the treatment of mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Interventions

DRUGIntervention: inferior alveolar nerve block injection

-22 patients received inferior alveolar nerve block injections of 3.6 mL (equivalent to 2 cartridges)

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis * good health * had at least 1 adjacent tooth plus a healthy canine

Exclusion criteria

* took medication could be interacting with any of the anesthetics used

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pulpal anesthesiaTen minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve blockpulpal anesthesia was tested with an electric pulp stimulator

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
analgesiathe patients were instructed to report any painful sensation at three phases: 1) dentin 2) pulp chamber 3) root canalTo evaluate the intensity of pain during the pulpectomy a verbal analogic scale was adopted

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
lip anesthesiaten minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve blockThe investigators evaluated the subjective lip anethesia by asking the patient whether his/her lip was numb

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026