Skip to content

Continuous And Pulsed Ultrasound Treatments On Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

The Placebo-Controlled Continuous And Pulsed Ultrasound Treatments on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome : A Randomised Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02054247
Enrollment
46
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome,ultrasound,pulsed ultrasound

Brief summary

The aim of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effects of pulsed and continuous ultrasound treatments combined with splint therapy on patients with mild and moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

Detailed description

The study included 36 carpal tunnel syndrome patients who were randomly divided into 3 groups.The first group received 0 W/cm2 placebo ultrasound treatment. second group received 1.0 W/cm2 continuous ultrasound treatment and the third group received 1.0 W/cm2 1:4 pulsed ultrasound treatment 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions. All patients were also treated with night splints during the treatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analogue Scale scores, Symptom Severity Scale scores, Functional Status Scale scores, median nerve motor conduction velocity. and distal latency and sensory conduction velocity of median nerve in the 2nd finger and palm were compared.

Interventions

DEVICEultrasound

a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions

a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2 and a pulsed mode duty cycle of 1:4, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions

same ultrasound device as described above seemed to be working but without delivering any output, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions

Sponsors

Eskisehir Osmangazi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mild or moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (without thenar atrophy or spontaneous activity on electrophysiological examination of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle)

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary entrapment neuropathies * Cervical radiculopathy * Systemic diseases with increased risk of the carpal tunnel syndrome * Gained surgical relief of the syndrome * Treated with ultrasound for the syndrome * A history of steroid injections into the carpal tunnel and of physical therapy within the last 3 months * Patients with either thenar atrophy or spontaneous activity (fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves) on electrophysiological examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Symptom Severity With Symptom Severity Scalethree weeksPost treatment comparison of Symptom Severity Scale between three groups minimum score is 11, maximum score is 55. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pain With Visual Analogue ScaleThree weeksPost treatment comparison of Visual Analogue Scale between three groups min score is 0, maximum score is 10. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.
Change From Baseline in Functional Status With Functional Status ScaleThree weeksPost treatment comparison of Functional Status Scale between three groups min score is 8, maximum score is 40. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.
Changes From Baseline Nervus Medianus Motor Conduction VelocityThree weeksPost treatment comparison of Median motor nerve conduction velocity between three groups

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound
ultrasound : a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2 ultrasound: a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions
15
Pulsed Ultrasound
pulsed ultrasound : a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2 and a pulsed mode duty cycle of 1:4 pulsed ultrasound: a frequency of 1 megahertz and with an intensity of 1 W/cm2 and a pulsed mode duty cycle of 1:4, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions
16
Placebo Ultrasound
placebo ultrasound : same ultrasound device as described above seemed to be working but without delivering any output placebo ultrasound: same ultrasound device as described above seemed to be working but without delivering any output, 5 days a week for a total of 15 sessions
15
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUltrasoundPulsed UltrasoundPlacebo UltrasoundTotal
Age, Continuous
age mean
43.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.79
45.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.98
44.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38
44.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.71
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
15 participants16 participants15 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants16 Participants15 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 160 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Symptom Severity With Symptom Severity Scale

Post treatment comparison of Symptom Severity Scale between three groups minimum score is 11, maximum score is 55. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.

Time frame: three weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Symptom Severity With Symptom Severity Scale23.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Pulsed UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Symptom Severity With Symptom Severity Scale22.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Placebo UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Symptom Severity With Symptom Severity Scale19.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
p-value: 0.442ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Status With Functional Status Scale

Post treatment comparison of Functional Status Scale between three groups min score is 8, maximum score is 40. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.

Time frame: Three weeks

Population: ultrasound group has 15 patients, pulsed us group has 16 patients, placebo us has 15 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Functional Status With Functional Status Scale18.8 scoreStandard Deviation 7.34
Pulsed UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Functional Status With Functional Status Scale19.31 scoreStandard Deviation 9.42
Placebo UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Functional Status With Functional Status Scale14.2 scoreStandard Deviation 4.52
p-value: 0.125ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale

Post treatment comparison of Visual Analogue Scale between three groups min score is 0, maximum score is 10. The clinic of patient worses when the score increases.

Time frame: Three weeks

Population: ultrasound group has 15, pulsed us group has 16, placebo us group has 15 patients

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale4.40 scoreStandard Deviation 2.32
Pulsed UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale2.68 scoreStandard Deviation 1.92
Placebo UltrasoundChange From Baseline in Pain With Visual Analogue Scale3.53 scoreStandard Deviation 1.95
p-value: 0.083ANOVA
Secondary

Changes From Baseline Nervus Medianus Motor Conduction Velocity

Post treatment comparison of Median motor nerve conduction velocity between three groups

Time frame: Three weeks

Population: ultrasound group has 15 patients, pulsed us group has 16 patients, placebo us group has 15 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasoundChanges From Baseline Nervus Medianus Motor Conduction Velocity54.26 meter/secondsStandard Deviation 4.29
Pulsed UltrasoundChanges From Baseline Nervus Medianus Motor Conduction Velocity55.68 meter/secondsStandard Deviation 5.24
Placebo UltrasoundChanges From Baseline Nervus Medianus Motor Conduction Velocity57.91 meter/secondsStandard Deviation 5.44
p-value: 0.146ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026