Skip to content

Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Conventional Transurethral Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02054013
Enrollment
101
Registered
2014-02-04
Start date
2014-02-11
Completion date
2022-07-16
Last updated
2022-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent entity, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years. The clinical picture of the disease includes lower urinary tract symptoms such as interrupted and weak urinary stream, nocturia, urgency and leaking and even sexual dysfunction in some individuals. Medical therapy is usually the first-line treatment. However, the efficacy of drugs like alpha-blockers is limited, and as disease progresses more invasive treatment options have to be taken into consideration. In cases with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the standard treatment. TURP, however, is limited to prostates smaller than 60-80ml and the procedure is associated with a complication rate. The cumulative short-term morbidity rate is around 11% and the necessity for surgical revision is as high as 6%. Bleeding requiring transfusions and transurethral resection syndrome represent potentially serious threats to elderly and frail patients. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been suggested as a minimal invasive alternative procedure, which can be performed in an outpatient setting with rapid recovery and low morbidity. The investigators hypothesize that PAE is non-inferior in the treatment of symptomatic BPH compared to conventional and established TUR-P.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmonopolar transurethral prostatectomy

Sponsors

Daniel Stephan Engeler
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men older than 40 * Patient must be a candidate for TURP * Refractory to medical therapy or patient is not willing to consider (further) medical treatment * Patient has a prostate size of at least 25 ml and not more than 80 ml, measured by ultrasound * IPSS ≥8 * QoL ≥3 * Qmax\<12 and/or urinary retention * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Mild symptoms (IPSS \<8) * Severe atherosclerosis * Severe tortuosity in the aortic bifurcation or internal iliac arteries * Acontractile detrusor * Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction * Urethral stenosis * Bladder diverticulum * Bladder stone with surgical indication * Allergy to intravenous contrast media * Contraindication for MRI imaging * Preinterventionally proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Renal failure (GFR\<60ml/min)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in the International Prostate Symptom ScoreBaseline and 12 weeks after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of post procedure catheterizationbaseline and post intervention
Changes in the CPSI and IIEFbaseline and at all follow-up controls after the intervention
Procedure time and radiation parametersafter intervention
Changes in bladder diaryBaseline and at all follow up controlsChanges in bladder diary (difference of voids during daytime and night-time, difference voided volume, difference liquid intake, difference incontinence episodes)
Duration of hospitalization post procedurehospital discharge
Changes of prostate volume using Magnetic Resonance ImagingBaseline, 12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Changes in urodynamic parametersBaseline and 12 and 24 months after intervention
Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size, measured preoperatively by TRUS and MRI at baseline Comparison of prostate size measured by TRUS and MRIbaseline
Percentage of prostate tissue devascularized, based on contrast-enhanced MRI12 weeks and 24 months after intervention
Pre- and postoperative changes in C-reactive Protein, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum amyloid A, Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10Baseline and 1 day, 2 days, 1 and 6 weeks post intervention

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026