Skip to content

A RCT to Compare Performance of Two Foam Dressings on Patient Well-being Related Endpoints.

A Randomised Cross-over Clinical Evaluation to Compare Performance of ALLEVYN◊ Life and Mepilex™ Border Dressings on Patient Well-being Related Endpoints.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02053337
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-02-03
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2018-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Wounds

Brief summary

ALLEVYN◊ Life and Mepilex™ Border are both layered foam dressings with a silicone adhesive wound contact layer. Both are indicated for the same uses; however ALLEVYN◊ Life has a number of attributes designed to meet a range of characteristics associated with principles of wellbeing. The aim for this evaluation is to assess, in a clinical setting and against a number of identified criteria, the performance of the ALLEVYN◊ Life dressing compared to Mepilex™ Border in terms of characteristics of the attributes of wellbeing. ◊ Trademark of Smith & Nephew ™ All trademarks acknowledged

Interventions

DEVICESelf adhesive foam dressing

Self adhesive foam dressing

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients ≥18 years old Males and females (females must not be pregnant and must use contraception if of child bearing potential.) Presence of a single suitable wound which can be the reference wound without treatment impacting on any other wound(s) on the patient. Presence of a suitable wound which can be treated with the available sizes and shapes of ALLEVYN◊ Life (10.3cm X 10.3cm, 12.9cm X 12.9cm, 15.4cm X 15.4cm, 21cm X 21cm) and Mepilex™ Border (7cm X 7.5cm, 10cm X 12.5cm, 15cm X 17.5, 17cm X 20cm) Presence of an exuding wound of at least 6 weeks duration at the point of enrolment, healing by secondary intention The patient is able to understand the evaluation and is willing to consent to the evaluation. The patient is available to participate for the anticipated duration of the evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with confirmed or suspected clinically infected reference wounds. Patients with wounds that, in the opinion of the clinician, is likely to heal within a time period of 4 weeks from point of enrolment. Patients with a reference wound undergoing treatment with compression therapy. Patients where a reference wound cannot be treated in isolation from other wounds. Patients with deep reference wounds that, in the opinion of the clinician, necessitate filler material. Patients with a known sensitivity to any of the constituents of the evaluation products. Patients with a known history of poor compliance with medical treatment. Patients who have participated in this evaluation previously and have been withdrawn from the study. Patients unable to understand or speak the English language. Patients without the capacity to understand and answer wellbeing related questions Females who are pregnant or breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective rating of the impact of the dressing performance and characteristics on patient wellbeing (referred to as patient wellbeing score)After (up to) 10 days of dressing wearThe primary outcome, a subjective patient wellbeing/preference score, is calculated using a combination of responses from 8 individual questions on a patient questionnaire and 2 further dressing retention related measures at the end of treatment with each dressing (up to maximum of 10 days). Individual patient questions relate to the effect of specific dressing performance /characteristics on patient wellbeing (each on a 0-10 scale: 0 = most negative response, 10 = most positive response).

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026