Skip to content

A Walking Intervention Through Text Messaging

Walking Intervention Through Texting Study: A Factorial Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02053259
Acronym
WalkIT
Enrollment
96
Registered
2014-02-03
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2021-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Motor Activity, Overweight, Physical Activity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate adaptive goal setting and feedback interventions (Adaptive Interventions) to promote physical activity behaviors and compare it to static physical activity interventions (Static Interventions) using two levels of goal setting (Adaptive Goals vs. Static Goals) and two levels of reinforcement procedures (Praise/Rewards and No Praise/Rewards) in a 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial. All four groups will receive the intervention via a semi-automated text message system developed by the investigators study team. The primary aim of this study will be to: 1. Evaluate whether the adaptive interventions result in greater change in physical activity (pedometer-measured steps/day) compared to the static Intervention groups. HYPOTHESES: Participants in the adaptive interventions will increase their steps/day more than participants in the Static Intervention groups. The Adaptive Goals and Reinforcement Group will outperform the other 3 groups. The secondary aims of this study will be to: 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the adaptive and static goal interventions in improving anthropometric, cardiovascular fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors. HYPOTHESES: Participants in the adaptive interventions will show greater improvements in fitness, lean and fat body mass, and serum biomarkers than participants in the Static Intervention groups. The Adaptive Goals and Reinforcement Group will outperform the other 3 groups. 3. to assess participants' satisfaction with the overall program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALReinforcement
BEHAVIORALStatic Goals
BEHAVIORALAdaptive Goals

Sponsors

Arizona State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* women and men of all races/ethnicities living in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Exclusion criteria

* be between 18 and 60 years old * currently not exceeding physical activity recommendations determined by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ short form). * not have a medical condition based on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) that requires supervised physical activity * not taking medication(s) that would prohibit a moderate intensity physical activity program * have a body mass index between 25 and 55 kg/m2 * not be currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 4 months * not be planning to leave Maricopa County for 10 days or more in the next 4 months * not planning to move from Maricopa County in the next 4 months * not currently in another physical activity, diet, or weight loss program (e.g. weight watchers) * have access to Microsoft Windows (XP, Vista, 7, 8) or Mac (10.5+) operating systems on computer with a USB port on a daily basis * have daily access to email and the internet * have a mobile phone with text messaging capabilities and be willing to send and receive up to 3-5 text messages per day.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.Daily for 4 monthsGiven this study used a 2 condition (adaptive vs. static goals) x 2 condition (immediate vs. delayed financial reinforcement) randomized factorial design we report main effects for each condition. Sample sizes for main effects will be 96 participants for each comparison (Adaptive vs. Static goals or Immediate vs. Delayed Reinforcement) as the other condition. Consistent with proper analyses of factorial designs, main effects for the goal setting conditions pool participants across reinforcement conditions, and main effects for reinforcement conditions pool participants across goal setting conditions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Fitness (VO2max) Between Study Arms.Baseline and 4 months
Changes in Body Mass Index and Body Composition Measured by Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Between Study Arms.Baseline and 4 months
Changes to iAortic Pulse Wave Velocity Assessed With the SphymocorTM Between Study Arms.Baseline and 4 months
Changes to Cardiovascular-disease (CVD) Risk and Inflammatory Markers (e.g. Glucose, Insulin, Lipids, Adhesion Molecules and Hemostatic Factors) Between Groups.Baseline and 4 months
Changes to Self-reported Physical Activity Measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).Baseline and 4 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
Adaptive with Immediate Rewards
25
Arm 2
Adaptive with Delayed Rewards
24
Arm 3
Static with Immediate Rewards
24
Arm 4
Static with Delayed Non-Contingent Rewards
23
Total96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1Arm 2Arm 3Arm 4Total
Age, Continuous41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.16
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants4 Participants6 Participants3 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants20 Participants18 Participants20 Participants77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants24 participants24 participants23 participants96 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants17 Participants19 Participants16 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 240 / 240 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 240 / 240 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.

Given this study used a 2 condition (adaptive vs. static goals) x 2 condition (immediate vs. delayed financial reinforcement) randomized factorial design we report main effects for each condition. Sample sizes for main effects will be 96 participants for each comparison (Adaptive vs. Static goals or Immediate vs. Delayed Reinforcement) as the other condition. Consistent with proper analyses of factorial designs, main effects for the goal setting conditions pool participants across reinforcement conditions, and main effects for reinforcement conditions pool participants across goal setting conditions.

Time frame: Daily for 4 months

Population: 2x2 factorial design main effects reported. Main effects for goal setting (n=49 for adaptive vs. n=47 for static) and reinforcement conditions (n=49 for immediate reinforcement vs. n=47 for delayed, non-contingent reinforcement).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adaptive GoalsChange in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.9695 stepsStandard Deviation 3948
Static GoalsChange in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.9836 stepsStandard Deviation 3930
Immediate ReinforcementChange in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.10562 stepsStandard Deviation 4032
Delayed Non-contingent ReinforcementChange in Fitbit-measured Steps/Day and Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity Between Study Arms.8969 stepsStandard Deviation 3802
Secondary

Change in Fitness (VO2max) Between Study Arms.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Secondary

Changes in Body Mass Index and Body Composition Measured by Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Between Study Arms.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Secondary

Changes to Cardiovascular-disease (CVD) Risk and Inflammatory Markers (e.g. Glucose, Insulin, Lipids, Adhesion Molecules and Hemostatic Factors) Between Groups.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Secondary

Changes to iAortic Pulse Wave Velocity Assessed With the SphymocorTM Between Study Arms.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Secondary

Changes to Self-reported Physical Activity Measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026