Skip to content

The Triple A Initiative Study (Aktionsbündnis Akute Atemnot)

A Prospective Randomized Study of Coordinated Diagnostic Pathways and Treatment Algorithms for Patients With Acute Dyspnea Including Point-of-care Testing of a Cardiac Biomarker by the Emergency Medical Service Team

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02049853
Enrollment
67
Registered
2014-01-30
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2015-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyspnea, Heart Failure

Keywords

acute dyspnea, heart failure, diagnostics, POCT analysis, preclinical area

Brief summary

Acute dyspnea is a common chief complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department. Patients with acute dyspnea display a high mortality rate. In-hospital mortality is as high as 10% during hospitalization and up to 30% within 6 months of follow-up. The Triple A Initiative Study is designed to improve the coordination of care for patients with acute dyspnea alerting the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). We hypothesize that the coordination of care starting at the EMS level including point-of-care testing of the cardiac biomarker NTproBNP will support preclinical and clinical diagnostic clarification. Treatment deriving from earlier diagnostic clarification will reduce length of stay in the hospital, treatment costs and improve patient's outcome.

Detailed description

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effects of point-of-care testing of NT-proBNP in patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the Emergency Medical Service (EMS).Patients will be enrolled in the Emergency Medical Services of participating German hospitals (Klinikum Nürnberg, Klinikum Fürth, Universitätsklinikum Jena). To be enrolled in the study, each patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Patients with acute dyspnea randomized to the POCT group will get a NT-proBNP-POCT measurement in the EMS. The emergency physician of the EMS will decide to apply predefined treatment strategies according to the resulting working hypothesis. Patients with acute dyspnea randomized to the standard care group will NOT get NT-proBNP measurement at the scene. The emergency physician of the ED will construct the working hypothesis following current treatment recommendations. The major focus of the study is to initiate treatment of heart failure as early as possible.

Interventions

DEVICENTproBNP measurement with point of care device Cobash232 in the POCT group

Sponsors

Jena University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
City Hospital Fürth
CollaboratorOTHER
Roche Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayrisches Rotes Kreuz Fuerth
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Johanniter Unfall Hilfe Nürnberg
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
DRK-Kreisverbandes Jena-Eisenberg-Stadtroda e.V.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Prof. Dr. Michael Christ
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute dyspnea (NYHA II-IV) * age \>= 18 years * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* cardiopulmonary resuscitation \< 7 days * cardiogenic shock, STEMI, respiratory failure, or other clinical conditions that require immediate intensive care admission or angioplasty * systolic blood pressure lower than 100 mmHg at first contact/presentation * ventricular tachycardia * severe aortic stenosis * advanced neoplasm (e.g. lung cancer, hematologic neoplasm, etc.) * chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Days alive and out of hospital within 30 days30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement of symptoms (dyspnea) 24h, 48h, 72h hours after admission1 month
Need for ICU admission during initial hospitalization6 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating both costs and effects of alternative therapies (NT-proBNP vs. control group) at day 30, 90 and 180 days60 months
Diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound to detect patients with acute heart failure1 month
In-hospital length of stay during follow-up of 30 and 90 days3 months
Patients functional status at 30, 90 and 180 days (Barthel Index)6 months
Mortality at 30, 90 and 180 days6 months
Total treatment costs at 30, 90 and 180 days6 months
Days alive and out of hospital at 90 and 180 days6 months
B-type natriuretic peptide level and calculated glomerular filtration rate at discharge6 months

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026