Skip to content

To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of LAYLA in Osteoarthritis Patients of the Knee

Double Blinded, Randomized, Active Drug Comparative, Multi-center, Phase Ⅳ Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of LAYLA in Osteoarthritis Patients of the Knee.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02049606
Enrollment
134
Registered
2014-01-30
Start date
2014-02-24
Completion date
2016-05-30
Last updated
2017-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

LAYLA, Non-inferiority, 100mm pain VAS

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of LAYLA tablet and CENATONE tablet in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Interventions

1 Tablet twice a day

DRUGCENATONE tablet

2 Tablets once a day

Sponsors

PMG Pharm Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥40 and ≤80 years of age * Radiographic evidence of grade 1,2 or 3 osteoarthritis based on the Kellgren & Lawrence radiographic entry criteria * Stable osteoarthritis during 3 months * Score of 100mm Pain VAS ≤ 80mm at screening * Score of 100mm Pain VAS ≥ 40mm at baseline * Written consent form voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

* Disease of spine or other Lower limb joints that could affect fo evaluate the efficacy * History of surgery or arthroscopy of the study joint within 6 months * Trauma of study joint within 12 months * Medication of constantly(more than 1 week) corticosteroid by oral within 3 months * Diagnosed with psychical disorder, and taking medication * Medication of intra-articular injection within 3 months * Uncontrollable Hypertension patients at screening test * History of upper gastrointestinal ulceration within 6 months, History of upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 12 months * History of lower gastrointestinal bleeding within 12 months * History of coronary artery bypass, systemic lupus erythematosus or mixed connective tissue disease * Serum creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin over ULN X 2.0 at screening test * History of hypersensitivity of LAYLA, CENATONE or NSAIDs * Participation in another clinical trials within 4 weeks * Medication of constantly (more than 1 week) narcotic analgesics within 3 months * Not consent about using effectual contraception method during trial * Pregnant or lactating woman * History of malignant tumor within 5 years * Investigator's judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes from the baseline in 100mm Pain VASBaseline through week8

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes rate from the baseline in 100mm Pain VAS8 weeks
Changes from the baseline in WOMAC8 Weeks
Changes from the baseline in EQ-5D8 Weeks
Changes in the patient self-assessed overall symptom score8 Weeks

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026