Skip to content

Pharmacodynamic Differences Between Branded and Unbranded Remifentanil Molecules

Pharmacodynamic Differences Between Branded and Unbranded Remifentanil Molecules Available in Colombia for Tracheal Intubation of Adult Patients, 2012-2013

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02048293
Enrollment
90
Registered
2014-01-29
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2014-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

remifentanil, propofol, pharmacodynamic, total intravenous anesthesia, orotracheal intubation, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, Cooper intubation condition score

Brief summary

Unbranded drug molecules are produced after the patent of a given drug has expired. Unbranded molecules of Remifentanil have been marketed in Colombia, and several reports by anesthesiologist indicate that there are differences in the physiologic response of patients to these molecules. The investigators hypothesized that unbranded molecules of remifentanil require higher doses to obtain desired physiological responses as compared to the branded molecule.

Detailed description

Introduction. Several remifentanil products are commercialized in Colombia while these have never been compared in a clinical setting. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacodynamic profile of the innovative molecule of remifentanil (group O = Ultiva®) and two unbranded molecules (group A = Remifentanil Laboratorios Chalver de Colombia S.A. and group B = Fada Remifentanilo) registered in Colombia. Methods. The investigators carried out a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The branded molecule of remifentanil (group O, n=29) was compared against the two unbranded molecules (group A, n=29; group B, n=32) during anesthetic induction and tracheal intubation in adult patients American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification = I without predictors for difficult airway. The target controlled infusion (TCI) doses evaluated were 6, 8 and 10 ng/ml with the Minto model. Induction was complemented with propofol 5 mg/ml (TCI) with the Schneider model and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. The primary outcome was defined as the difference in mean arterial pressure and heart rate pre-intubation (TCI equilibrium) and post-intubation (maximum measurement within 5 minutes).

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanyl, Ultiva®

Anesthetic induction for orotracheal intubation. Group O

DRUGRemifentanil Laboratorios Chalver de Colombia S.A.

Anesthetic induction for orotracheal intubation. Group A

DRUGFada Remifentanilo

Anesthetic induction for orotracheal intubation. Group B

Sponsors

Hospital de San Jose
CollaboratorOTHER
Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients requiring orotracheal intubation * 18-50 years old * Body mass index \<31 kg/m2 * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Risk of difficult airway * History of opioid use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite outcome of heart rate or mean arterial pressure difference before and after tracheal intubationAverage of 5 minutesHeart rate measured with EKG. Mean arterial pressure measured with automatic blood pressure cuff.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cooper intubation condition scoreMeasured during tracheal intubation, average of 30 secondsJaw relaxation: 0 poor, 1 minimum, 2 moderate, 3 good. Vocal cords: 0 closed, 1 closing, 2 moving, 3 open. Intubation response: 0 severe cough, 1 mild cough, 2 mild diaphragmatic movement, 3 no response. Cooper score: Jaw relaxation + Vocal cords + Intubation response

Countries

Colombia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026